Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Der Gruppenklima-Fragebogen (Group Climate Questionnaire, GCQ-S)

  • Chapter
Methoden der empirischen Gruppentherapieforschung

  • 462 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Eine Gruppensitzung kann anhand einer Reihe von Interaktions-Dimensionen beschrieben werden. Diese wiederum konstituieren das „Gruppen-Klima“. Es handelt sich dabei um eine aggregierte Einschätzung, die das Verhalten aller Gruppenmitglieder berücksichtigt. Die entsprechenden Daten können aus verschiedenen Quellen gewonnen werden, z.B. von den Therapeuten, von unabhängigen Beobachtern oder trainierten Forschern. Es hat aber auch einige Vorteile, die Wahrnehmungen der Gruppenmitglieder selbst zu messen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Alden, L.E. (1978). Factor analysis of the Ward Atmosphere Scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 175–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alden, L.E., Wiggins, J.S. & Pincus, A.L. (1990). Construction of circumplex scales for the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems. Journal of Personality Assessement, 55, 521–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bednar, R.L. & Kaul, T.J. (1994). Experiential group research: Can the cannon fire? In A.E. Bergin & S.L. Garfield (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change ( 4th ed. ). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaine, C.J. (1995). Interpersonal learning in short-term integrated group psychotherapy. Dissertation Abstracts MAI 33/01:22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, G.R. (1983). Norm regulation in therapy groups. In R.R. Dies & K.R. MacKenzie (Eds.), Advances in group psychotherapy: Integrating research and practice. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braaten, L.J. (1989). Predicting positive goal attainment and symptom reduction from early group climate dimensions. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 39, 377–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braaten, L.J. (1990). The different patterns of group climate critical incidents in high and low cohesion sessions of group psychotherapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 40, 477–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braaten, L.J. (1991). Group cohesion: A new multidimensional model. Group, 15, 39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brucki, H.L. (1988). The effects of activity group structure on cohesion, engagement, and effective meanings in acute-care psychiatric patients. Dissertation Abstracts MAI 26/01:115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budman, S.H., Demby, A., Feldstein, M., Redondo, J., Scherz, B., Bennett, M.J., Koppenaal, G., Daley B.S., Hunter, M. & Ellis, J. (1987). Preliminary findings on a new instrument to measure cohesion in group psychotherapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 37, 75–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budman, S.H., Soldz, S., Demby, A., Feldstein, M., Springer, T. & Davis, S. (1989). Cohesion, alliance, and outcome in group psychotherapy. Psychiaty, 52, 339–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, T. & Fuhriman, A. (1983). Curative factors in group therapy: A review of the recent literature. Small Group Behavior, 14, 131–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catina, A. & Tschuschke, V. (1993). A summary of empirical data from the investigation of two psychoanalytic groups by means of repertory grid technique. Group Analysis, 26, 433–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corsini, R. & Rosenberg, B. (1955). Mechanisms of group psychotherapy: Processes and dynamics. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 51, 406–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, E., Bloch, S. & Wanless, J. (1994). Therapeutic factors: Interpersonal and intrapersonal mechanisms. In A. Fuhriman & G.M. Burlingame (Eds.), Handbook of group psychotherapy: An empirical and clinical synthesis. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dierick, P. & Lietaer, G. (1990). Therapeutic factors in group psychotherapy and growth groups: An exploratory study on member and therapist perceptions. In G. Lietaer, J. Rombauts & R. van Balen (Eds.), Client-centered and experiential psychotherapy in the nineties. Leuven: Leuven University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drescher, S., Burlingame, G.M. & Fuhriman, A. (1985). Cohesion: An odissey in empirical understanding. Small Group Behavior, 16, 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, D.R. (1994). Dream interpretation with divorcing women. Dissertation Abstracts DAI-B 54/10:5385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler, J.M. (1994). The development of cohesion and its relation to outcome in cognitive-behavioral and mutual support interventions for depression. Dissertation Abstracts DAIS, 459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadiyono, J.E.P. (1986). The effect of the native language and English during interactional group psychotherapy with Indonesian and Malaysian students, and the effectiveness of this method for foreign students from non-western countries. Dissertation Abstracts DAI-B 46/10:3594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, A. et al. (1994). Supervisionsgruppen mit Krankenpflegepersonal and Stationsteams: Ergebnisse einer empirischen Untersuchung. Gruppenpsychotherapie and Gruppendynamik, 30, 144–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, D., Norton, B., Eisdorfer, C. & Gianturco, D. (1976). Group process research: A factor analytic approach. Vortrag SPR-Tagung, San Diego/CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, H. (1992). Affektives Erleben im Gruppenprozeß and Therapieerfolg. Psychotherapie Psychosomatik. Medizinische Psychologie, 42, 120–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, W.F. (1965). Hill Interaction Matrix Manual and Supplement (Rev. Ed.). Los Angeles: Youth Studies Center, University of Southern California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, R.W. (1994). Thirteen cohesion scales compared: A heuristic model of interaction group cohesion (interaction groups). Dissertatoon Abstracts DAI-A 55 /05: 1191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, L.M., Rosenberg S.E., Baer, B.A., Ureno, G. & Villasenor, V.S. (1988). Inventory of Interpersonal Problems: Psychometric properties and clinical applications. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychoogy56, 885–892.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurley, J.R. (1989). Affiliativeness and outcome in interpersonal groups: Member and leader perspectives. Psychotherapy, 26, 520–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurley, J.R. & Brooks, L.J. (1987). Group climate’s principal dimension: Affiliation. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 37, 441–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurley, J.R. & Brooks, L.J. (1988). Primacy of affiliativeness in ratings of group climate. Psychological Reports, 62, 123–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, E.M., Sturke, I.T. & Schaeffer, J. (1992). Inpatient group processes parallel unit dynamics. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 42, 407–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanas, N., DiLella, V.J. & Jones, J. (1984). Process and content in an outpatient schizophrenic group. Group, 8, 13–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanas, N. & Ziegler, J. (1984). Group climate in a stress discussion group for medical interns. Group, 8, 35–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanas, N. & Barr, M.A. (1986). Process and content in a short-term inpatient schizophrenic group. Small Group Behavior, 17, 355–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanas, N., Stewart, P., Deri, J., Ketter, T. & Haney, K. (1989). Group process in short-terni outpatient therapy groups for schizophrenics. Group, 13, 67–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G.A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kivlighan, D.M. & Jauquet, C.A. (1990). Quality of group member agendas and group session climate. Small Group Behavior, 19, 452–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kivlighan, D.M. & Goldfine, D.C. (1991). Endorsement of therapeutic factors as a function of stage of group development and participant interpersonal attitudes. Journa of Counseling Psychology, 38, 150–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kivlighan, D.M. & Angelone, E.O. (1992). Variables influencing participants’ perception of group climate. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39, 468–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, S.P. & Ermann, G. (1976). Der Stuttgarter Bogen (SB) zur Erfassung des Erlebens in der Gruppe. Gruppendynamik, 2, 133–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, M.A., Yalom, I.D. & Miles, M.B. (1973). Encounter groups. First facts. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, K.R. (1977). The measurement of group norms. Vortrag Tagung der Scottish Society for Psychotherapy Research, Glasgow/Schottland.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, K.R. (1979). Group norms: Importance and measurement. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 29, 471–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, K.R. (1981). Measurement of group climate. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 31, 287–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, K.R. (1983). The clinical application of a group climate measure. In R.R. Dies & K.R. MacKenzie (Eds.), Advances in group psychotherapy: Integrating research and practice. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, K.R. (1987). Therapeutic factors in group psychotherapy. A contemporary view. Group, 11, 26–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, K.R. (1988). Readers’ Forum: On group climate’s principal dimension: Affiliation. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 38, 523–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, K.R. (1990). Introduction to time-limited group psychotherapy (1st ed.). Washington DC: American Psychiatric Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, K.R. (1994). Group development. In A. Fuhriman & G.M. Burlingame (Eds.), Handbook of group psychotherapy — An empirical and clinical synthesis. New York: J Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, K.R., Dies, R.R., Coché, E., Rutan, J.S. & Stone, W.S. (1987). An analysis of AGPA Institute groups. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 37, 55–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, K.R. & Tschuschke, V. (1993). Relatedness, group work, and outcome in longterm inpatient psychotherapy groups. Journal of Psychotherapy: Practice & Research, 2, 147–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manderscheid, R.W., Koenig, G.R. & Silbergeld, S. (1978). Psychosocial factors for classroom, group, and ward. Psychological Reports, 43, 555–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marmar, C.R., Weiss, D.S. & Gaston, L. (1989). Towards the validation of the California Therapeutic Alliance Rating System. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1, 426–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLees, E., Margo, G.M., Waterman, S. & Beeber, A. (1992). Group climate and group development in a community meeting on a short-term inpatient psychiatric unit. Group, 16, 18–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moos, R.H. (1974). Evaluating treatment environments. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moos, R.H. & Humphrey, B. (1973). Group environment scale technical report. Palo Alto/CA: Social Ecology Laboratory, Dep. of Psychiatry, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nehls, N.M. (1990). Group therapy for persons with borderline personality disorder (therapy, personality disorder). Dissertation Abstracts DAI-B 51/02:997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neimeyer, R.A. (1993). An appraisal of constructivist psychotherapies. Journal of Clinical and Consulting Psychology, 61, 221–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, D.L. & Peterson, C. (1988). Effects of project versus parallel groups on social interaction and affective responses in senior citizens. American Journal of Occupational Therapy., 42, 23–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phipps, L.B. & Zastowny, T.R. (1988). Leadership behavior, group climate and outcome in group psychotherapy: A study of outpatient psychotherapy groups. Group, 12, 157–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piper, W.E., Marrache, M., Lacroix, R., Richardson, A.M. & Jones, B.D. (1983). Cohesion as a basic bond in groups. Human Relations, 36, 93–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piper, W.E., McCallum, M. & Azim, H.F.A. (1992). Adaptation to loss through short-term group psychotherapy. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaughnessy, P. & Kivlighan, D.M. (1995). Using group participants’ perceptions of therapeutic factors to form client typologies. Small Group Research, 26, 250–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silbergeld, S., Koenig, G.R., Manderscheid, R.W., Meeker, B.F. & Homing, C.A. (1975). Assessment of environment-therapy systems: The Group Atmosphere Scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 460–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silbergeld, S., Manderscheid, R.W. & Koenig, G.R. (1977). The psychosocial environment in group therapy evaluation. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 27, 153–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slough, L.J. (1986). Participant and observer perspectives on the interpersonal climate of small groups. Unpubl. Master’s Thesis, Michigan State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffan, J.A. & Nelson, D.L. (1987). The effects of tool scarcity on group climate and affective meaning within the context of a stenciling activity. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 41, 449–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoliaroff, S.S. (1992). Group composition and emergent leadership: Their effects on group process in personal growth groups. Dissertation Abstracts DAI-B 52/09:4988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauß, B. (1992). Empirische Untersuchungen zur stationären Gruppenpsychotherapie: Eine Ubersicht. Gruppenpsychotherapie und Gruppendynamik, 28, 125–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauß, B. & Burgmeier-Lohse, M. (1994). Stationäre Langzeitgruppenpsychotherapie. Heidelberg: Asanger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teufel, T., Költzow, R. (1983). Methodische Optimierung der Faktorenstruktur des Stuttgarter Bogens. In H. Enke, V. Tschuschke & W. Volk (Hrsg.), Psychotherapeutisches Handeln — Grundlagen, Methoden und Ergebnisse der Forschung. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschuschke, V. (1993). Wirkfaktoren stationärer Gruppenpsychotherapie — Prozeß-Ergebnis-Relationen. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschuschke, V., Hess, H. & MacKenzie, K.R. (1991). Der Gruppenklima-Fragebogen. Methodik und Anwendung eines Meßinstruments zum Gruppenerleben. Gruppenpsychotherapie und Gruppendynamik, 26, 340–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschuschke, V. & Dies, R.R. (1994). Intensive analysis of therapeutic factors and outcome in long-term inpatient groups. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 44, 185–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschuschke, V. & MacKenzie, K.R. (Im Druck). Group climate and outcome in four long-term psychotherapy groups.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, L. (1973). An assessment of the dimensionality of Moos’ climate Scale. Amercian Journal of Community Psychology, 1, 342–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodiska, L.H. (1987). Concern about confidentiality: Its relationship to self-disclosure and group climate in a small group setting. Dissertation Abstracts 48(1-B):279–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yalom, I.D. (1995). Theory and practice of group psychotherapy (4th ed.). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. K. Roy MacKenzie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik, Universität Kiel, Niemannsweg 147, D 24105, Kiel, Deutschland

    Bernhard Strauß (PD Dr. phil.) (PD Dr. phil.)

  2. Psychologisches Institut III, Universität Hamburg, Von-Melle-Park 5, D 20146, Hamburg, Deutschland

    Jochen Eckert (Prof. Dr. phil.) (Prof. Dr. phil.)

  3. Abteilung Psychotherapie, Klinikum der Universität Ulm, Am Hochsträß 8, D 89081, Ulm, Deutschland

    Volker Tschuschke (PD Dr. phil.) (PD Dr. phil.)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

MacKenzie, K.R. (1996). Der Gruppenklima-Fragebogen (Group Climate Questionnaire, GCQ-S). In: Strauß, B., Eckert, J., Tschuschke, V. (eds) Methoden der empirischen Gruppentherapieforschung. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-10786-6_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-10786-6_12

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-12695-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-663-10786-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation