Advertisement

Föderalismus pp 134-156 | Cite as

Federalism in the United States of America: A Continual Tension Between Persons and Places

  • John Kincaid
Part of the Politische Vierteljahresschrift Sonderheft book series (PVS, volume 32)

Abstract

The development of American federalism since the 1780s can be analyzed from various perspectives. The approach taken here will focus on conflicting normative values attributed to the federal arrangement and on changes in those values that have altered this arrangement — in particular, the rise of federal power and of coercive federalism during the latter half of the last century. The basic argument is that the development of American federalism has been substantially shaped by what, in shorthand, can be called a continual tension between persons and places. That is, is the United States a union of persons in which individualism and individual rights are paramount, or is the United States a union of places in which communitarianism and the states as polities are paramount? This tension stems from compromises embedded in the founding of the federal union, compromises necessitated by the fact that this tension was not only present at the founding but also predated it by some 160 years.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bowman, Ann OM./Kearney, Richard JC, 1986: The Resurgence of the States. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  2. Calhoun, John C., 1831: Fort Hill Address On the Relation Which the States and the General Government Bear to Each Other, in: Michael B. Levy (ed.), Political Thought in America: An Anthology. Homewood, IL, 247–253.Google Scholar
  3. Clark, Jane P., 1938: The Rise of a New Federalism: Federal-State Cooperation in the United States. New York.Google Scholar
  4. Corwin, Edward S., 1941: Constitutional Revolution, ltd., Claremont.Google Scholar
  5. Elazar, Daniel J., 1962: The American Partnership: Intergovernmental Cooperation in the Nineteenth-Century United States. Chicago.Google Scholar
  6. Farkas, Suzanne, 1971: Urban Lobbying: Mayors in the Federal Arena. New York.Google Scholar
  7. Frankfurter, Felix, 1964: The Commerce Clause Under Marshall, Taney and Waite. New York.Google Scholar
  8. Gore, Al, 1993: From Red Tape to Results: Creating a Government that Works Better and Costs Less. Washington, DC: Report of the National Performance Review, U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  9. Hertzke, Allen D./Peters, Ronald M. (eds.), 1992: The Atomistic Congress: An Interpretation of Congressional Change, Armonk. New York.Google Scholar
  10. Kearney, Richard C./Sheehan, Reginald S., 1992: Supreme Court Decision Making: The Impact of Court Composition on State and Local Government Litigation, in: Journal of Politics 54, 1008–1025.Google Scholar
  11. Kincaid, John, 1993: Constitutional Federalism: Labor’s Role in Displacing Places to Benefit Persons, in: PS: Political Science amp; Politics 26, 172–177.Google Scholar
  12. Kincaid, John, 1993a: From Cooperation to Coercion in American Federalism: Housing, Fragmentation and Preemption, 1780–1992, in: Journal of Law and Politics 9 (2), 333–430.Google Scholar
  13. Lipset, Seymour M., 1963: The First New Nation. New York.Google Scholar
  14. O’Brien, David M., 1993: The Rehnquist Court and Federal Preemption: In Search of a Theory, in: Publius: The Journal of Federalism 23, 15–31.Google Scholar
  15. Orth, John V., 1987: The Judicial Power of the United States: The Eleventh Amendment in American History. New York.Google Scholar
  16. Osborne, David/Gaebler, Ted, 1992: Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. Reading, MA.Google Scholar
  17. Riker, William H, 1964: Federalism: Origin, Operation, Significance. Boston.Google Scholar
  18. Rivlin, Alice M, 1991: Reviving the American Dream. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  19. Skocpol, Theda, 1992: Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge.Google Scholar
  20. Tarlton, Charles D., 1965: Symmetry and Asymmetry as Elements of Federalism: A Theoretical Speculation, in: Journal of Politics 27, 861–873.Google Scholar
  21. US. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations, 1992: Federal Statutory Preemption of State and Local Authority. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  22. U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations, 1993: Federal Regulation of State and Local Governments: The Mixed Record of the 1980s. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  23. Walker, David B., 1981: Toward a Functioning Federalism. Cambridge.Google Scholar
  24. Webster, Daniel, 1830: Second Reply to Hayne, in: Benjamin F. Wright (ed.), American Political Theory. New York (1929), 480–488.Google Scholar
  25. Wise, Charles/O’Leary, Rosemary, 1992: Is Federalism Dead or Alive in the Supreme Court? Implications for Public Administrators, in: Public Administration Review 52, 599–572.Google Scholar
  26. Wright, Deil S., 1988: Understanding Intergovernmental Relations. 3rd. ed., Pacific Grove, CA.Google Scholar

Court Decisions

  1. Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).Google Scholar
  2. Coleman v. Thompson, 111 S.Ct. 2546 (1991).Google Scholar
  3. Darby v. United States, 312 U.S. 100 (1941).Google Scholar
  4. Frothingham v. Mellon, 262 U.S. 447 (1923).Google Scholar
  5. Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority, 469 U.S. 528 (1985).Google Scholar
  6. Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U.S. (9 Wheat.) 1 (1824).Google Scholar
  7. Gitlow v. New York, 268 U.S. 652 (1925).Google Scholar
  8. McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. (4 Wheat.) 1 (1819).Google Scholar
  9. National League of Cities v. Usery, 426 U.S. 833 (1976).Google Scholar
  10. New York v. United States (1992).Google Scholar
  11. Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896).Google Scholar
  12. Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964).Google Scholar
  13. Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).Google Scholar
  14. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida (1996).Google Scholar
  15. South Carolina v. Baker, 485 U.S. 505 (1988).Google Scholar
  16. South Dakota v. Dole, 483 U.S. 203 (1987).Google Scholar
  17. Texas v. White, 74 U.S. 700 (1869).Google Scholar
  18. United States v. Alfonso Lopez, 115 S. Ct. 1624 (1995).Google Scholar
  19. Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 U.S. 1 (1964).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Kincaid

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations