Skip to main content

From Resolution to Transformation: The Role of Dialogue Projects

  • Chapter
Transforming Ethnopolitical Conflict

Abstract

Dialogues can be viewed as one means — if not the classical one — of dealing constructively with conflicts. As one popular formula puts it: “As long as you’re talking, you can’t be shooting”. “What better method is there of resolving a contentious issue”, so runs another down-to-earth, commonsense observation, “than through an honest exchange of views?” “And”, says discourse ethics, “what other way is there of finding lasting solutions to the numerous political-cum-moral conflicts in an interdependent and pluralistic world, than through “practical discourse between the affected parties” (Apel 1990).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Apel, Karl-Otto 1990. Diskurs und Verantwortung, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-On, Dan 2000. Den Abgrund überbrücken: Mit persönlicher Geschichte politischen Feindschaften begegnen, Hamburg: Edition Koerber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bercovitch, Jacob (ed.) 1996. Resolving International Conflicts. The Theory and Practice of Mediation, Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bercovitch, Jacob & Allison Houston 1996. “The Study of International Mediation: Theoretical Issues and Empirical Evidence,” in Bercovitch, op. cit.,11–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bercovitch, Jacob & Jeffrey Z. Rubin (eds.) 1992. Mediation in International Relations, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, John 1990. Conflict: Resolution and Provention, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, John & Frank Dukes (eds.) 1990. Conflict: Readings in Management & Resolution, London: Macmillan

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles Stewart Mott Foundation 1999 Reaching for Peace: Lessons Learned from Mott Foundation’s Conflict Resolution Grantmaking, 1989–1998, Evaluation conducted by CDR Associates and the Berghof Research Center for Constructive Conflict Management, Flint, Michigan: Charles Stewart Mott Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, Roger and William Ury 1981. Getting to Yes, Boston, Ms: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, Ronald J. 1997. Interactive Conflict Resolution, Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haumersen, Petra, Helmut Rademacher and Norbert Ropers 2002. Konfliktbearbeitung in der Zivilgesellschaft. Die Workshop-Methode im rumänisch-ungarischen Konflikt, Münster: LIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, Mark 1995. “Defining and Evaluating Success: Facilitative Problem-Solving Workshops in an Interconnected Context,” Paradigms: The Kent Journal of International Relations, 9, 2, 150–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, Herbert C. 1992. “Informal Mediation by the Scholar/Practitioner,” in Bercovitch and Rubin, op. cit., 64–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, Herbert C. 1994. “Promoting Joint Thinking in International Conflicts: An Israeli Palestinian Continuing Workshop,” Journal of Social Issues, 50, 1, 157–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, Herbert C. 1995. “Contributions of an Unofficial Conflict Resolution Effort to the Israeli-Palestinian Breakthrough,” Negotiation Journal, January 1995, 19–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleiboer, Marieke 1996. “Understanding the Success and Failure of International Mediation,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 40, 2, 360–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederach, John Paul 1997. Building Peace: Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided Societies, Washington, DC: United States Institute for Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund, Michael and Guenola Rasamoelina (eds.) 2000. The Impact of Conflict Prevention Policy: Cases, Measures, Assessments, Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCartney, Clem 1986. “Human Rights Education,” in 11th Annual Report. Standing Advisory Committee on Human Rights, London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miall, Hugh, Oliver Ramsbotham and Tom Woodhouse 1999. Contemporary Conflict Resolution, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Christopher 1993. “Problem-Solving Exercises and Theories of Conflict Resolution,” in Sandole and van der Merwe, op. cit., 78–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Christopher & Michael Banks 1996. Handbook of Conflict Resolution: The Analytical Problem-Solving Approach, London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otten, Hendrik & Werner Treuheit 1994. Interkulturelles Lernen in Theorie und Praxis: Ein Handbuch für Jugendarbeit und Weiterbildung, Opladen: Leske und Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reychler, Luc & Thania Paffenholz (eds.) 2000. Peacebuilding: A Field Manual, Boulder, Co: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Marc Howard & Jay Rothman (eds.) 1999. Theory and Practice in Ethnic Conflict Management: Theorizing Success and Failure, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, Jay 1998. “Dialogue in Conflict: Past and Future,” in Eugene Weiner, op. cit., 216–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandole, Dennis J.D. & Hugo van der Merwe (eds.) 1993. Conflict Resolution. Theory and Practice: Integration and Application, Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, Tanya 1998. A Synthesis of Evaluations of Peacebuilding Activities Undertaken by Humanitarian Agencies and Conflict Resolution Organisations, London: Overseas Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, Eugene (ed.) 1998. The Handbook of Interethnic Coexistence, New York, NY: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, Andreas, Richard Goldstone, Donald Horowitz, Ulrike Joas, and Conrad Schetter 2003. Facing Ethnic Conflicts: Perspectives from Research and Policy-making (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolleh, Oliver 2002. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen interner Akteure bei der Friedensbildung in geteilten Gesellschaften. Die Conflict Resolution Trainer Group in Zypern (19931997), Berlin: LIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zartman, I. William 1985. Ripe for Resolution: Conflict and Intervention in Africa, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Alex Austin Martina Fischer Norbert Ropers

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ropers, N. (2004). From Resolution to Transformation: The Role of Dialogue Projects. In: Austin, A., Fischer, M., Ropers, N. (eds) Transforming Ethnopolitical Conflict. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-05642-3_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-05642-3_13

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-8100-3940-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-663-05642-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics