Abstract
Until recently the majority of the studies on modern Turkey have focused primarily on the Republican period, even to the extent of ignoring the influence of the Ottoman past. Outside of Turkey, only a handful of historians of the older generation who witnessed the birth of the Republic were interested in contemporary history, but those who were would often divorce their treatment of the evolution of modern Turkey from all but its most immediate antecedents. Modern Turkish history was viewed as a process that began after the replacement of indigenous institutions with those adopted by westernizers.1 Meanwhile in Turkey, the intelligentsia, whose ranks then included the members of the academic profession, were taking stock of the Turkish revitalization, rewriting history to stress the Turkish (rather than Ottoman) past and attempting to reinforce the nation-building program by inculcating a sense of national unity based on a common cultural past of the Turkish-speaking people.2
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
It must be noted that by far the majority of European historians who were interested in Turkey belonged to the so-called category of Orientalists who were largely interested in earlier periods.
Especially in the 1930s, the official policies of the government influenced the direction of research. The cultural policy was to encourage a break from the Ottoman past while funds were established to sponsor research on the linguistic and cultural heritage of the Turkish people and a Turkish history thesis was developed. The alphabet reform also helped the distancing of the younger generation from Ottoman texts.
Philosophy was often denigrated as being a waste of time and in the traditional Ottoman educational system it was even considered a harmful branch of knowledge (Adivar, 1943: 154).
The term “middle classes” is used for want of a better one; it does not refer to any class structure as such but defines groups which fall into a similar economic category.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1984 Leske Verlag + Budrich GmbH, Opladen
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Evin, A. (1984). Communitarian Structures and Social Change. In: Evin, A. (eds) Modern Turkey: Continuity and Change. Schriften des Deutschen Orient-Instituts. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-01177-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-01177-4_1
Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-8100-0488-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-663-01177-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive