Skip to main content

The Protection of Geographical Indications Through FTAs and the Collision with Prior User Rights

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Kreation Innovation Märkte - Creation Innovation Markets
  • 302 Accesses

Abstract

The EU’s extraterritoriality strategy of geographical indication (GI) protection through free trade agreements (FTAs) generates a conflict of rights between the cross-border protection of GIs and the prior user rights in the rest of the world. It constitutes a more specific attempt by the EU to obtain additional protection outside its territory for agricultural products. The Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) provides for specific exceptions to GI exclusive rights. The exceptions enable the continuity of use of protected terms under certain conditions.

Although the different forms of protection are welcome to distinguish and add value to products, extraterritorial protection through FTAs collides with pre-existing private rights modifying the principle of non-retroactivity of international treaties, affects competition and constitutes a market access restriction for local and imported products.

The concerns relate to the request for exclusivity for common names that have become part of the public domain, trademarks obtained in good faith, and names of plant varieties and animal breeds. In short, the objection is to undermine the rights of producers outside European territory, granted under the TRIPS exceptions, affecting GATT/WTO principles and the balance of rights and obligations resulting from the Uruguay Round.

Affiliated Research Fellow, Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition, Munich, Germany. Member of the Observatory of Buenos Aires and of the Board of Directors of the “Smart IP for Latin America” Association. Head of the Specialization Program in Negotiations and International Trade in Agro-industries, University of Buenos Aires (UBA) School of Agricultural Sciences. Researcher, UBA Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies on Industrial and Economic Law (CEIDIE). Professor, Master Program in Intellectual Property, FLACSO Argentina. Professor, Latin American Integration Institute, University of La Plata School of Legal and Social Sciences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Kerr and Clark (2022).

  2. 2.

    Blasetti (2022), p. 107.

  3. 3.

    Zappalaglio et al. (2022).

  4. 4.

    Raustiala and Munzer (2007).

  5. 5.

    Kennedy (2021).

  6. 6.

    Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Article 28 states the general principle that a treaty shall not be applied retroactively “unless a different intention appears from the treaty or is otherwise established”. Absent a contrary intention, a treaty cannot apply to acts or facts which took place, or situations which ceased to exist, before the date of its entry into force.

  7. 7.

    Pick (2023).

  8. 8.

    GATT 1994 Arts. I and III.

  9. 9.

    MERCOSUR State Parties: Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay.

  10. 10.

    The oppositions have confidential status under the national procedures.

  11. 11.

    Blasetti (2022).

  12. 12.

    WTO (2001), paras. 17–19.

  13. 13.

    Calboli and Wee Loon (2017).

  14. 14.

    Blasetti et al. (2022).

  15. 15.

    The examples are taken from the oppositions filed in Argentina under Resolution 319/2017 of the Ministry of Agro-Industry.

  16. 16.

    The production area of the DO Toro wines covers the southeast of the province of Zamora and the southwest of the province of Valladolid, in the far west of the region of Castilla y León.

  17. 17.

    Art. 24.5 TRIPS.

  18. 18.

    Article X.35.3 (d), IP Chapter, EU-Mercosur Association Agreement.

  19. 19.

    For more information, see https://fecovita.com/en/home-en/

  20. 20.

    Under Resolution 319/2017.

  21. 21.

    It should be noted that it was not until the 1970s that the first steps were taken to create what would eventually become the designation of origin Toro, whose recognition was achieved in 1987.

  22. 22.

    For more information, see https://toro.com.ar/#nuestrahistoria

  23. 23.

    https://fecovita.com/en/our-associated-cooperatives/

  24. 24.

    For more information, see https://www.rutacoop.com.ar/cooperativas/fecovita-federacia-sup3-n-de-cooperativas-vitivina-shy-colas-argentinas-coop-ltda-.html/1205

  25. 25.

    For more information, see https://www.fecovita.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Informe_Sustentabilidad_2019.pdf

  26. 26.

    For more information, see https://fecovita.com/en/our-wineries/

  27. 27.

    Law 22,362 on Trademarks and Designations.

  28. 28.

    Art. 24.5 TRIPS.

  29. 29.

    For more information, see https://toro.com.ar/#toro

  30. 30.

    Within MERCOSUR, well-known marks are protected under Article 9.5 of Decision 8/95. Protection is provided through the application of Art. 6bis of the Paris Convention.

  31. 31.

    For more information, see https://www.argentina.gob.ar/sites/default/files/2021/10/informe_de_complejos_exportadores_-_1deg_semestre_2021.pdf

  32. 32.

    Article X.35.3, IP Chapter, EU-Mercosur Association Agreement.

  33. 33.

    Ibid. (d).

  34. 34.

    Ibid. (e).

  35. 35.

    See the European list of GIs on https://circabc.europa.eu/ui/group/09242a36-a438-40fd-a7af-fe32e36cbd0e/library/fd3f6c9f-1371-440f-b2ff-9357ea63bcc2/details

  36. 36.

    Blasetti (2022).

  37. 37.

    Art. 24.6 TRIPS.

  38. 38.

    For more information, see https://www.oiv.int/public/medias/2273/oiv-liste-publication-2013-complete.pdf

  39. 39.

    Under Resolution 319/2017.

  40. 40.

    For more information, see https://www.agw.org.au/

  41. 41.

    Article X.35.4, IP Chapter, EU-Mercosur Association Agreement.

  42. 42.

    Ibid. fn. 11.

  43. 43.

    See fn. 73 to the European list of GIs in Annex II, IP Chapter, EU-Mercosur Association Agreement.

  44. 44.

    Art. 24.6 TRIPS.

  45. 45.

    Art. X.35.6, IP Chapter, EU-Mercosur Association Agreement.

  46. 46.

    See https://bodegaslopez.com.ar/

  47. 47.

    Under Resolution 319/2017.

  48. 48.

    Law 24,425/1994.

  49. 49.

    Sect. 236 Law 18,284.

  50. 50.

    See https://www.argentina.gob.ar/inv

  51. 51.

    Resolution C. 43/98.

  52. 52.

    Sect. 8 Law 22,802/1983.

  53. 53.

    García Sellart (2003), p. 61; Jardel and Gatti (2003), p. 28; Molina (2015), p. 64; Schiavone (2003), p. 29; Otamendi (2002), p. 86.

  54. 54.

    National Court of Appeals for Federal Contentious Administrative Matters of September 19, 1957 as confirmed by National Supreme Court of Justice of November 14, 1960 (Judgments 248:385 et seq.). National Court of Appeals for Federal Civil and Commercial Matters of December 23, 1981, 0360.

  55. 55.

    Art. X.35.6, IP Chapter, EU-Mercosur Association Agreement.

  56. 56.

    Ibid. art. X.35.9.

  57. 57.

    See European List of GIs in Annex II, IP Chapter, EU-Mercosur Association Agreement.

  58. 58.

    Art. 23.3 TRIPS.

  59. 59.

    Art. X.35.8, IP Chapter, EU-Mercosur Association Agreement.

  60. 60.

    See https://www.argentina.gob.ar/sites/default/files/i.g._y_d.o.c._de_la_republica_argentina_web_inv_1.pdf_.pdf.pdf_.pdf

  61. 61.

    See http://servicios.infoleg.gob.ar/infolegInternet/anexos/75000-79999/79896/norma.htm

  62. 62.

    National Court of First Instance for Federal Contentious Administrative Matters No. 4 of February 24, 2011, 36619/2004.

  63. 63.

    Supreme Court of Justice of December 29, 2015, 1442/2012(48-C).

  64. 64.

    Under Resolution 319/2017.

  65. 65.

    Coello and Gonzalez Botija (2003), p. 25.

  66. 66.

    ECLAC (2021).

  67. 67.

    See http://servicios.infoleg.gob.ar/infolegInternet/verNorma.do?id=799

  68. 68.

    Art. X.35.8, IP Chapter, EU-Mercosur Association Agreement.

  69. 69.

    Annex II Part A, IP Chapter, EU-Mercosur Association Agreement.

  70. 70.

    Blasetti (2020) p. 1113.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roxana Carmen Blasetti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Blasetti, R.C. (2024). The Protection of Geographical Indications Through FTAs and the Collision with Prior User Rights. In: Thouvenin, F., Peukert, A., Jaeger, T., Geiger, C. (eds) Kreation Innovation Märkte - Creation Innovation Markets. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-68599-0_61

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-68599-0_61

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-68598-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-68599-0

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics