Zusammenfassung
In einer multiperspektivischen qualitativen Studie wurde aus der Sicht von Senior:innen, Angehörigen, diplomierten Pflegefachpersonen und Hausärzt:innen untersucht, wie es zur Nutzung und Nicht-Nutzung digitaler Hilfsmittel, am Beispiel persönlicher Alarmierungsgeräte, kommt. Die beiden empirisch entwickelten Prozesse, der Legitimierungs- und der Verhandlungsprozess, zeigen auf, welche Rolle Gesundheitsfachpersonen und insbesondere die professionelle ambulante Pflege in der Nutzung digitaler Hilfsmittel spielen.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Literatur
Agboola S, Golas S, Fischer N, Nikolova-Simons M, op den Buijs J, Schertzer L, Kvedar J, Jethwani K (2017) Healthcare utilization in older patients using personal emergency response systems: an analysis of electronic health records and medical alert data. BMC Health Serv Res 17:282
Boehm A (1994) Grounded Theory – wie aus Texten Modelle und Theorien gemacht werden. In: Boehm A, Mengel A, Muhr T (Hrsg) Texte verstehen: Konzepte, Methoden, Werkzeuge. UVK, Konstanz, S 121–140
Bronswijk JEMHV, Bouma H, Fozard JL, Kearns WD, Davidson GC (2009) Defining gerontology for R&D purposes. Gerontechnology 8(1):3–10
Carnemolla P (2018) Ageing in place and the internet of things – how smart home technologies, the built environment and caregiving intersect. Vis Eng 6:7
Charmaz K (2014) Constructing grounded theory. SAGE, London
Chen K, Lou VWQ (2020) Measuring senior technology acceptance: development of a brief, 14-item scale. Innovation in Aging 4(3):igaa016
Conci M, Pianesi F, Zancanaro M (2010) Older adults’ attitude towards a monitoring technology. In: Proceedings of the 28th annual European conference on cognitive ergonomics, Delft, 25–27 August 2010
Connelly K, ur Rehman LK, Mokhtari M et al (2014) Approaches to understanding the impact of technologies for aging in place: a mini-review. Gerontology 60(3):282–288
Croutte P, Prieur V (2020) Baromètre du numérique 2018. https://www.credoc.fr/publications/barometre-du-numerique-2018-2
Dahms R, Haesner M (2018) Akzeptanz von Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologien bei Senioren: Rolle der Angehörigen bei der Nutzung durch Senioren. Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung 13(1):46–52
de Casterlé BD, Gastmans C, Bryon E, Denier Y (2012) QUAGOL: a guide for qualitative data analysis. Int J Nurs Stud 49(3):360–371
Freeman S, Marston HR, Olynick J, Musselwhite C, Kulczycki C, Genoe R, Xiong B (2020) Intergenerational effects on the impacts of technology use in later life: insights from an international, multi-site study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(16):5711
Heart T, Kalderon E (2013) Older adults: are they ready to adopt health-related ICT? Int J Med Informatics 82(11):209–231
Khosravi P, Ghapanchi AH (2016) Investigating the effectiveness of technologies applied to assist seniors: a systematic literature review. Int J Med Informatics 85(1):17–26
Kim KI, Gollamudi SS, Steinhubl S (2017) Digital technology to enable aging in place. Exp Gerontol 88:25–31
Künemund H, Tanschus NM (2014) The technology acceptance puzzle. Z Gerontol Geriatr 47(8):641–647
Lapierre N, Neubauer N, Miguel-Cruz A, Rios Rincon A, Liu L, Rousseau J (2018) The state of knowledge on technologies and their use for fall detection: a scoping review. Int J Med Informatics 111:58–71
Luijkx K, Peek S, Wouters E (2015) „Grandma, you should do it – t’s cool“ older adults and the role of family members in their acceptance of technology. Int J Environ Res Public Health 12(12):15470–15485
Nyman S, Victor C (2012) Use of personal call alarms among community-dwelling older people. Ageing Soc 34(1):67–89
Peek STM, Wouters EJM, van Hoof J, Luijkx KG, Boeije HR, Vrijhoef HJM (2014) Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: a systematic review. Int J Med Informatics 83(4):235–248
Piscotty RJ, Kalisch B, Thomas AG (2015) Impact of healthcare information technology on nursing practice. J Nurs Scholarsh 47(4):287–293
Schulz R, Wahl H-W, Matthews JT, de Vito DA, Beach SR, Czaja SJ (2015) Advancing the aging and technology agenda in gerontology. Gerontologist 55(5):724–734
Stokke R (2016) The personal emergency response system as a technology innovation in primary health care services: an integrative review. J Med Internet Res 18(7):e187
Thilo FJS, Hahn S, Halfens RJG, Heckemann B, Schols JMGA (2021a) Facilitating the use of personal safety alerting device with older adults: The views, experiences and roles of relatives and health care professionals. Geriatr Nurs 42(4):935–942
Thilo FJS, Schols JMGA, Halfens RJG, Linhart M, Hahn S et al (2021b) Deciding about the use of a personal safety alerting device – the need for a legitimation process: a qualitative study. J Adv Nurs 77(1):331–342
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Thilo, F.J.S. (2023). Rolle der professionellen, ambulanten Pflege bei der Auswahl und Anwendung von digitalen Hilfsmitteln in der Häuslichkeit. In: Fischer, F., Zacher, J. (eds) Digitale Chancen in der häuslichen Pflege nutzen . Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-68012-4_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-68012-4_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-68011-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-68012-4
eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)