Skip to main content

Bilanzpolitik – Grundlagen

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Externe Unternehmensrechnung

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Vgl zu einer solchen Definition etwa Healy/Wahlen (1999), S. 368.

  2. 2.

    Nach IFRS 16 wird dagegen bei einem Sale and Lease Back das zurückbehaltene Nutzungsrecht weiterhin mit dessen Buchwert angesetzt. Ein Gewinn oder Verlust wird damit nur für die sonstigen übertragenen Rechte realisiert.

  3. 3.

    Vgl zB Stein (1993), S. 983 ff.

  4. 4.

    Vgl Walker (2013), S. 457.

  5. 5.

    Glaum/Landsman/Meyer (2022) zeigen, dass big bath accounting weltweit verbreitet und positiv mit dem Umfang der in einem Land eingeräumten bilanzpolitischen Spielräume assoziiert ist.

  6. 6.

    Vgl Beidleman (1973), S. 653.

  7. 7.

    Vgl dazu Trueman/Titman (1988).

  8. 8.

    Vgl Ronen/Sadan (1981), S. 9 f.

  9. 9.

    Vgl Fudenberg/Tirole (1995) und entsprechende empirische Analysen bei DeFond/Park (1997).

  10. 10.

    Vgl zB Wagner (2005), S. 497 f.

  11. 11.

    Vgl dazu im Überblick Dechow/Skinner (2000), S. 244 f.

  12. 12.

    Vgl auch Baetge/Ballwieser (1978), S. 518 ff.

  13. 13.

    Eine Liste von Indizien für das Vorliegen von Unrichtigkeiten und Manipulationen in der Bilanz aus Sicht des Abschlussprüfers findet sich zB im Prüfungsstandard PS 210 des IDW.

  14. 14.

    So Guay/Kothari/Watts (1996), S. 86; zum Folgenden S. 87.

  15. 15.

    Vgl zur Diskussion zB Healy/Wahlen (1999), S. 374 f.

  16. 16.

    Vgl Dechow/Sloan/Sweeney (1996), S. 27.

  17. 17.

    Vgl dazu Aboody (1996). Die Abschreibungsverpflichtung unterscheidet sich in den USA nach der Bilanzierung der Explorationskosten mit full cost (die gesamten Explorationskosten werden aktiviert) oder successful effort (nur die Explorationskosten der erfolgreichen Aufsuchungen werden aktiviert). Letztere müssen bestimmte außerplanmäßige Abschreibungen, die erstere bilanzieren, nur im Anhang angeben. Aboody zeigt, dass die Kapitalmarktreaktion bei Angabe im Anhang praktisch null ist, während sie sich bei Bilanzierung sehr wohl auswirkt.

  18. 18.

    Vgl Imhoff/Lipe/Wright (1995).

  19. 19.

    Vgl zB Watts/Zimmerman (1986), S. 71 ff.

  20. 20.

    Vgl zB Küting/Weber (2012), S. 406 ff.

  21. 21.

    Vgl zB Dechow/Sloan/Sweeney (1995), Dechow/Schrand (2004).

  22. 22.

    Vgl Dechow/Sloan/Sweeney (1995).

  23. 23.

    Vgl McNichols (2000), Dechow/Richardson/Tuna (2003).

  24. 24.

    Vgl Kothari/Leone/Wasley (2005).

  25. 25.

    Vgl Thomas/Zhang (2000), S. 350.

  26. 26.

    Vgl Ball (2013), S. 851 f.

  27. 27.

    Vgl Chen/Hribar/Melessa (2018).

  28. 28.

    Vgl Dechow/Ge/Schrand (2010), S. 371–376.

  29. 29.

    Für die Querschnittsanalyse werden noch mehrere Kontrollvariablen für Unterschiede zwischen den Unternehmen eingeführt.

  30. 30.

    Vgl Degeorge/Patel/Zeckhauser (1999).

  31. 31.

    Vgl zB Dechow/Richardson/Tuna (2003).

  32. 32.

    Vgl Hemmer/Labro (2019).

  33. 33.

    Umfassende Überblicke über solche Studien finden sich zB in Fields/Lys/Vincent (2001), Armstrong/Guay/Weber (2010), Dechow/Ge/Schrand (2010), Walker (2013).

  34. 34.

    Vgl Loughran/Ritter (1995).

  35. 35.

    Vgl Dechow/Skinner (2000), S. 245 f.

  36. 36.

    Vgl Watts/Zimmerman (1986), S. 208.

  37. 37.

    Vgl Healy (1985), S. 90 f, ähnlich auch Degeorge/Patel/Zeckhauser (1999), S. 8 ff.

  38. 38.

    Vgl Watts/Zimmerman (1986), S. 216.

  39. 39.

    Vgl Fields/Lys/Vincent (2001).

  40. 40.

    Vgl zB Beatty/Weber (2003).

  41. 41.

    Vgl Miller/Skinner (1998), S. 218 f.

  42. 42.

    So Dechow/Sloan (1991), S. 75.

  43. 43.

    Vgl kritisch dazu Murphy/Zimmerman (1993), S. 307 ff.

  44. 44.

    Vgl zB Beaver/Ryan/Wahlen (1997).

  45. 45.

    Stein (1993), S. 992, mit Verweis auf Rückle (1983), S. 207.

  46. 46.

    Haller/Park (1995), S. 104 f.

  47. 47.

    Murphy/Zimmerman (1993), S. 305.

Literatur

  • Aboody, D.: Recognition versus Disclosure in the Oil and Gas Industry, Journal of Accounting Research 1996, Supplement, S. 21–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, C.S./Guay, W.R./Weber, J.P.: The Role of Information and Financial Reporting in Corporate Governance and Debt Contracting, Journal of Accounting and Economics 50 (2010), S. 179–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baetge, J./Ballwieser, W.: Probleme einer rationalen Bilanzpolitik, Betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung und Praxis 1978, S. 511–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, R./Kothari, S.P./Nikolaev, V.V.: Econometrics of the Basu Asymmetric Timeliness Coefficient and Accounting Conservatism, Journal of Accounting Research 2013, S. 1071–1097.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, W.H./Ryan, S.G./Wahlen, J.M.: When Is “Bad News” Viewed as “Good News”?, Financial Analysts Journal, January/February 1997, S. 45–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beidleman, C.R.: Income Smoothing: The Role of Management, The Accounting Review 1973, S. 653–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgstahler, D./Dichev, I.: Earnings Management to Avoid Earnings Decreases and Losses, Journal of Accounting and Economics 24 (1997), S. 99–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cecchini, M./Jackson, S.B./Liu, X.: Do Initial Public Offering Firms Manage Accruals? Evidence from Individual Accounts, Review of Accounting Studies 2012, S. 22–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W./Hribar, P./Melessa, S.: Incorrect Inferences When Using Residuals as Dependent Variables, Journal of Accounting Research 2018, S. 751–796.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D.A./Dey, A./Lys, T.Z.: Real and Accrual-Based Earnings Management in the Pre- and Post-Sarbanes-Oxley Periods, The Accounting Review 2008, S. 757–787.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, N.D./Denis, D.J./Naveen, L.: Do Firms Manage Earnings to Meet Dividend Thresholds, Journal of Accounting and Economics 45 (2008), S. 2–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dechow, P./Ge, W./Schrand, C.: Understanding Earnings Quality: A Review of the Proxies, Their Determinants and Their Consequences, Journal of Accounting and Economics 50 (2010), S. 344–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dechow, P.M./Richardson, S.A./Tuna, I.: Why Are Earnings Kinky? An Examination of the Earnings Management Explanation, Review of Accountings Studies 2003, S. 355–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dechow, P.M./Schrand, K.M.: Earnings Quality, Charlotteville, VA 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dechow, P.M./Skinner, D.J.: Earnings Management: Reconciling the Views of Accounting Academics, Practitioners, and Regulators, Accounting Horizons 2000, S. 235–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dechow, P.M./Sloan, R.G.: Executive Incentives and the Horizon Problem: An Empirical Investigation, Journal of Accounting and Economics 14 (1991), S. 51–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dechow, P.M./Sloan, R.G./Sweeney, A.P.: Detecting Earnings Management, The Accounting Review 1995, S. 193–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dechow, P.M./Sloan, R.G./Sweeney, A.P.: Causes and Consequences of Earnings Manipulation: An Analysis of Firms Subject to Enforcement Actions by the SEC, Contemporary Accounting Research 1996, S. 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFond, M.L./Jiambalvo, J.: Debt Covenant Violation and Manipulation of Accruals, Journal of Accounting and Economics 17 (1994), S. 145–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeFond, M.L./Park, C. W.: Smoothing Income in Anticipation of Future Earnings, Journal of Accounting and Economics 23 (1997), S. 115–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Degeorge, F./Patel, J./Zeckhauser, R.: Earnings Management to Exceed Thresholds, Journal of Business 1999, S. 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dichev, I.D./Graham, J.R./Harvey, C.R./Rajgopal, S.: Earnings Quality: Evidence from the Field, Journal of Accounting and Economics 56 (2013), S. 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Souza, J./Jacob, J./Ramesh, K.: The Use of Accounting Flexibility to Reduce Labor Renegotiation Costs and Manage Earnings, Journal of Accounting and Economics 30 (2001), S. 187–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, J.A./Shaw, W.H.: Write-Offs as Accounting Procedures to Manage Perceptions, Journal of Accounting Research 1988, Supplement, S. 91–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fields, T.D./Lys, T.Z./Vincent, L.: Empirical Research on Accounting Choice, Journal of Accounting and Economics 31 (2001), S. 255–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, D./Tirole, J.: A Theory of Income and Dividend Smoothing Based on Incumbency Rents, Journal of Political Economy 1995, S. 75–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaum, M./Landsman, W./Meyer, N.: How Deep is your Bath? Cross-Country Differences in Earnings Management following CEO Turnovers, Working Paper 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J.R./Harvey, C.R./Rajgopal, S.: The Economic Implications of Corporate Financial Reporting, Journal of Accounting and Economics 40 (2005), S. 3–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guay, W.R./Kothari, S.P./Watts, R.L.: A Market-Based Evaluation of Discretionary Accrual Models, Journal of Accounting Research 1996, Supplement, S. 83–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haller, A./Park, P.: Darlehensvereinbarungen als Ursache für bilanzpolitisches Verhalten, Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 1995, S. 89–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ham, C./Lang, M./Seybert, N./Wang, S.: CFO Narcissism and Financial Reporting Quality, Journal of Accounting Research 2017, S. 1089–1135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, P.M.: The Effect of Bonus Schemes on Accounting Decisions, Journal of Accounting and Economics 7 (1985), S. 85–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healy, P.M./Wahlen, J.M.: A Review of the Earnings Management Literature and Its Implications for Standard Setting, Accounting Horizons, December 1999, S. 365–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemmer, T./Labro, E.: Management by the Numbers: A Formal Approach to Deriving Informational and Distributional Properties of “Unmanaged” Earnings, Journal of Accounting Research 2019, S. 5–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imhoff, E.A./Lipe, R.C./Wright, D.W.: Is Footnote Disclosure an Adequate Alternative to Financial Statement Recognition, The Journal of Financial Statement Analysis, Fall 1995, S. 70–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jia, Y./van Lent, L./Zeng, Y.: Masculinity, Testosterone, and Financial Misreporting, Journal of Accounting Research 2014, S. 1195–1246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J.J.: Earnings Management During Import Relief Investigations, Journal of Accounting Research 1991, S. 193–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kothari, S.P./Leone, A.J./Wasley, C.E.: Performance Matched Discretionary Accrual Measures, Journal of Accounting and Economics 39 (2005), S. 163–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Küting, K./Weber, C.-P.: Die Bilanzanalyse, 10. Auflage, Stuttgart 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, R./Ritter, J.R.: The New Issues Puzzle, Journal of Finance 1995, S. 23–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNichols, M.F.: Research Design Issues in Earnings Management Studies, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 2000, S. 313–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G.S./Skinner, D.J.: Determinants of the Valuation Allowance for Deferred Tax Assets Under SFAS No. 109, The Accounting Review 1998, S. 213–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K.J./Zimmerman, J.L.: Financial Performance Surrounding CEO Turnover, Journal of Accounting and Economics 16 (1993), S. 273–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramanna, K./Watts, R.L.: Evidence on the Use of Unverifiable Estimates in Required Goodwill Impairment, Review of Accounting Studies 2012, S. 749–780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronen, J./Sadan, S.: Smoothing Income Numbers: Objectives, Means, and Implications, Reading, MA et al 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roychowdhury, S.: Earnings Management Through Real Activities Manipulation, Journal of Accounting and Economics 42 (2006), S. 335–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rückle, D.: Normative Theorie der Steuerbilanzpolitik, Wien 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrand, C.M./Zechman, S.L.C.: Executive Overconfidence and the Slippery Slope to Financial Misreporting, Journal of Accounting and Economics 53 (2012), S. 311–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, H.-G.: Ziele und Maßnahmen der Konzernbilanzpolitik, Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung 1993, S. 973–993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teoh, S.H./Wong, T.J./Rao, G.R.: Are Accruals during Initial Public Offerings Opportunistic?, Review of Accounting Studies 1998, S. 175–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J./Zhang, X.: Identifying Unexpected Accruals: A Comparison of Current Approaches, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 2000, S. 347–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trueman, B./Titman, S.: An Explanation for Accounting Income Smoothing, Journal of Accounting Research 1988, Supplement, S. 127–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, F.W.: Besteuerung, in: Bitz, M.//Domsch, M./Ewert, R./Wagner, F.W. (Hrsg.): Vahlen’s Kompendium der Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Band 2, 5. Auflage, München 2005, S. 439–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, M.: How Far can we Trust Earnings Numbers? What Research Tells Us About Earnings Management, Accounting and Business Research 2013, S. 445–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, R.L./Zimmerman, J.L.: Positive Accounting Theory, Englewood Cliffs 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zang, A.Y.: Evidence on the Trade-Off between Real Activities Manipulation and Accrual-Based Earnings Management, The Accounting Review 2012, S. 675–703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zmijewski, M./Hagerman, R.: An Income Strategy Approach to the Positive Theory of Accounting Standard Setting/Choice, Journal of Accounting and Economics 3 (1981), S. 129–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Literaturempfehlungen

Literaturempfehlungen

1.1 Allgemeine Literatur

  • Dechow, P.M./Skinner, D.J.: Earnings Management: Reconciling the Views of Accounting Academics, Practitioners, and Regulators, Accounting Horizons 2000, S. 235–250.

  • Walker, M.: How Far Can We Trust Earnings Numbers? What Research Tells Us About Earnings Management, Accounting and Business Research 2013, S. 445–481.

1.2 Spezielle Literatur

  • Dechow, P./Ge, W./Schrand, C.: Understanding Earnings Quality: A Review of the Proxies, Their Determinants and Their Consequences, Journal of Accounting and Economics 50 (2010), S. 344–401.

  • Ewert, R./Wagenhofer, A.: Earnings Management, Conservatism, and Earnings Quality, Foundations and Trends in Accounting 6 (2011), 2012, S. 65–186.

  • Fields, T.D./Lys, T.Z./Vincent, L.: Empirical Research on Accounting Choice, Journal of Accounting and Economics 31 (2001), S. 255–307.

  • Graham, J.R./Harvey, C.R./Rajgopal, S.: The Economic Implications of Corporate Financial Reporting, Journal of Accounting and Economics 40 (2005), S. 3–73.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wagenhofer, A., Ewert, R., Schneider, G. (2023). Bilanzpolitik – Grundlagen. In: Externe Unternehmensrechnung. Springer Gabler, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-67409-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-67409-3_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-67408-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-67409-3

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics