Skip to main content

Narrating Sustainability—Some Insights from Wilhelm Schapp’s Philosophy of Stories

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Erzählhorizonte

Part of the book series: Ethik – Mensch –Technik ((EMT))

  • 153 Accesses

Abstract

The title of this paper conveys two core concepts of contemporary philosophical and socio-political reflection: narrative and sustainability. The possibility of associating the concepts of narrative and sustainability is connected, in strictly formal terms, with their emergence alongside two anthropological cornerstones of contemporaneity. The first cornerstone relates to an existential dimension of human beings within the “Gutenberg galaxy” (McLuhan 1962), cleverly summarised by Marquard in the formula “Narrare necesse est” (Marquard 2004, p. 56), which expresses our need to tell and tell about ourselves, whether it be verbally or on social media.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The concept was first introduced in 1987 by the World Commission on Environment and Development in the famous “Brundtland Report”. For the full version of the document, see WCED, Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, London 1987.

  2. 2.

    Narrative ethics is of particular importance in this regard. See Joisten, K. (2007); for a bibliographical reference on the relationship between ethics and narrativity, see Thiemer, N. (2007).

  3. 3.

    “Within this universal history (Weltgeschichte), not only must each ‘I’ have a place inasmuch as it is entangled, but it must also reasonably seep into the whole with its stories. Everything must make as much sense as the single story (Einzelgeschichte). This sense can only be related to the ‘we’ to which each individual belongs. Individuals are not only entangled in the story but also in the universal history as a result of the co-belonging of co-entanglement to a given ‘we’” (Schapp 2012, p. 200).

  4. 4.

    According to Marquard, the self is never the sole protagonist; rather, it has a constant passion-action relationship with stories (see Marquard 2004, p. 48).

  5. 5.

    The “external world” is one of the most challenging problems for Husserl and his students. Schapp tackles this topic in his doctoral dissertation Beiträge zur Phänomenologie der Wahrnehmung (Schapp 2004a, b) defended in 1909. Despite Husserl’s supervision, it already shows features of that phenomenological realism that will have a considerable influence on some of Husserl’s most famous pupils (see Nuccilli 2020).

  6. 6.

    “In addition to what is to be ascribed to the tree in a genuine sense, everything that could be called fate of the tree, including health and disease, comes out of the horizon. The carpenter who is already lurking in the background, the insects that make his life difficult, the rain and the sunshine emerge without threatening it. Everything belongs to the tree, whether it be more or less distant. Nothing of the sort acts at the margins. Quite the opposite, everything is constantly there with it and not around it as if it were really inside the tree, but inasmuch as it would be meaningless to represent a tree without all that we could separate from it by resorting to violence against thought. If we mention lightning and thunderstorm, we do it only to point out what belongs to the tree. If we are willing to reject any absolutisation of that sort, we could say that lightning and thunderstorm are part of the weather pattern around the tree, that health and disease are nothing more than mere poles, that the tree is never absolutely sick and never absolutely healthy. If we understand the ‘formation tree’ in these terms, we are therefore already deeply immersed in the stories that enable us to come closer to the tree. The tree is already here before us as entangled in stories. It is entangled in stories of others and cannot therefore emerge as a tree in any other way” (Schapp 2012, p. 154).

Literatur

  • A/res/70/1. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_70_1_E.pdf (Aufgerufen am: 02.08.22).

  • Buber, M. (1970). I and Thou. Trans. by W. Kaufmann, New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, D. (1986). Time, Narrative and History. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, D. (2018). Narrations of Sustainability. How to Tell the Story of the Socio-Ecological Transformation. In GAIA 27/3, pp. 334–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, M. (1911). Zum Problem der Stimmungseinfühlung. In Zeitschrift für Ästhetik und allgemeine Kunstwissenschaft 6, pp. 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greisch, J. (1990). Empêtrément et intrigue. Une phénoménologie pure de la narrativité est-elle concevable? In Études Phénoménologiques 6/11, pp. 41–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1977). The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. Trans. by W. Lovitt. New York/London: Garland Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendersson, H. & Wamsler C. (2020). New stories for a more conscious, sustainable society: claiming authorship of the climate story. In Climatic Change 158, 3–4, pp. 345–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1970). The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. trans. by D. C. Evanston. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. & Kern, I. (Ed.) (1977). Grundprobleme der Phänomenologie 1910/1911. HUA XIII. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1987). Aufsätze und Vorträge (1911–1921). HUA XXV. Th. Nenon-H. & R. Sepp (Ed.) Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joisten, K. (2007). Möglichkeiten und Grenzen einer narrativen Ethik. Grundlagen, Grundpositionen, Anwendungen. In K. Joisten (Ed.): Narrative Ethik. Das Gute und das Böse erzählen, pp. 9–25. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joisten, K. (2015). Wilhelm Schapps Philosophie der Geschichten. Ein Zugang. In W. Schapp: Philosophie der Geschichten. 3. überar. Aufl., pp. 5–11. Frankfurt a. M.: Klostermann Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joisten, K. (2012). Vorwort zur fünften Auflage In W. Schapp & J. Schapp (Ed.): In Geschichten verstrickt, pp. V–VII. Frankfurt a. M.: Klostermann Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, M. (1962). The Gutenberg Galaxy. The Making of Typographic Man. London: University of Toronto press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquard, O. (2004). Die Philosophie der Geschichten und die Zukunft des Erzählens. In K. H. Lembeck (Ed.) Geschichte und Geschichten: Studien zur Geschichtenphänomenologie Wilhelm Schapps, pp. 45–56. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuccilli, D. (2017). La filosofia dell’irretimento di W. Schapp In W. Schapp: Reti di storie. L’essere dell’uomo e della cosa. Trans. by D. Nuccilli, pp. 9–21. Milano: Mimesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuccilli, D. (2018a). History and Stories: Schapp’s Ontological Conception of the Entanglement. In Kritika & Kontext 22, pp. 27–41. Bratislava: Samuel Abraham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuccilli, D. (2018b). Theodor Lipps, empatia e conoscenza degli altri io. In Th. Lipps & D. Nuccilli (Ed.): La conoscenza degli altri io. Tr. it. a cura di, pp. 11–42. Roma: Castelvecchi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinotti, A. (2002). Empatia: „un termine equivoco e molto equivocato“. In Discipline Filosofiche XII, 2, pp. 64–80. Bologna: Quodlibet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohlmeyer, M. (2004). Geschichten-Hermeneutik. Berlin: Lit Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raimondi, G. M. (2010). Im Netz des Lebens verstrickt. In K. Joisten (Ed.): Das Denken Wilhelm Schapps, pp. 159–171. Freiburg i. B.: Karl Alber Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolf, T. (2004). Der dichtende Gegenstand. In K. H. Lembeck (Ed.): Geschichte und Geschichten: Studien zur Geschichtenphänomenologie Wilhelm Schapps, pp. 87–114. Würzburg: Königshausen und Neumann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolf, T. (2007). ‘Die Geschichte steht für den Mann’. Ethische Aspekte der narrativen Repräsentation. In K. Joisten (Ed.): Narrative Ethik das Gute und das Böse, pp. 151–168. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schapp, J. (2004a). Positive Welten und Sonderwelt des Abendlandes in der Geschichtenphilosophie Wilhelm Schapps. In T. Breyer (Ed.) & J. Jansen (Ed.) & I. Römer (Ed.): Phänomenologische Forschungen, pp. 133–149. Hamburg: Meiner Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schapp, W. (2009). Metaphysik der Naturwissenschaft. 3. Aufl. Frankfurt a. M.: Klostermann Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schapp, W. (2012). In Geschichten verstrickt. Zum Sein von Mensch und Ding 5. Aufl. Frankfurt a. M.: Klostermann Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schapp, W. (2015). Philosophie der Geschichten 3. überar. Aufl. K. Joisten & J. Schapp (Ed.) Frankfurt a. M.: Klostermann Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schapp, W. (2004b). Beiträge zur Phänomenologie der Wahrnehmung 5. unverä. Aufl. Frankfurt a. M.: Klostermann Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholtz, G. (2004). Das Verhältnis der Geschichten zur Geschichte. In K. H. Lembeck (Ed.): Geschichte und Geschichten: Studien zur Geschichtenphänomenologie Wilhelm Schapps, pp. 57–72. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiemer, N. (2007). Narrativität und Ethik. Ein bibliographischer Kommentar. In K. Joisten (Ed.): Narrative Ethik. Das Gute und das Böse erzählen, pp. 293–301. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiemer, N. (2020). Essentia oder existentia? Vom wesentlichen und geschichtlichen Verstricktsein des Menschen in Geschichten. In K. Joisten & J. Schapp & N. Thiemer (Ed.): Die Rezeption der Geschichtenphilosophie Wilhelm Schapps, pp. 149–163. Freiburg/München: Karl Alber Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • WCED (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniele Nuccilli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nuccilli, D. (2023). Narrating Sustainability—Some Insights from Wilhelm Schapp’s Philosophy of Stories. In: Barbagallo, E., Gerhartz, I.W., Thiemer, N. (eds) Erzählhorizonte. Ethik – Mensch –Technik. J.B. Metzler, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-67347-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-67347-8_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: J.B. Metzler, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-67346-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-67347-8

  • eBook Packages: J.B. Metzler Humanities (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics