Skip to main content

Which Rights Do Have the Astronauts?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Der Schutz des Individuums durch das Recht
  • 1256 Accesses

Abstract

For decades, outer space was a specific place of international cooperation, understanding and compromise. The elaboration and adoption of the five UN space treaties in the era of the Cold War was presented by international lawyers as a miracle flowing from common interests and existing ties of the two opposing military blocks in the vast area governed by the “province of mankind” principle. However, the dramatically deteriorated political situation in Europe during the last months and years, especially in its Eastern part, has demonstrated that our belief in the rationalism of international relations was in the best case naïve. This development did not leave space cooperation untouched: The end of the epoque of easy launching of satellites from Baikonur, of starts of Soyuz rockets from the ESA launchpad in French Guiana, and the politicized reduction of the Russian participation in the International Space Station show the poisoned atmosphere also in this area.

Prof. Dr. Mahulena Hofmann, CSc. SES Chair in Space, SatCom and Media Law, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies, 1967, UNTS, vol. 610, No. 8843 (OST), Agreement on the Rescue of Astronauts, the Return of Astronauts and Return of Objects Launched into Outer Space, 1968, UNTS, vol. 672, No. 9574 (ARRA), 1972 Convention on International Liability for Damage Caused by Space Objects, 1972, UNTS, vol. 961, No. 13810 (LIAB), Convention on Registration of Objects Launched into Outer Space, UNTS, vol. 1023, No. 15020 (REG), Agreement Governing the Activities of States on the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies, 1984, UNTS, vol. 1363, No. 23003 (MA).

  2. 2.

    Article I OST, Article 4 MA.

  3. 3.

    Article II OST, Article 3 MA.

  4. 4.

    Article V OST.

  5. 5.

    On 23.11.2022, the European Space Agency presented the “new generation of astronauts”, see https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Human_and_Robotic_Exploration/ESA_presents_new_generation_of_astronauts, accessed 30.11.2022.

  6. 6.

    Capotorti (1979).

  7. 7.

    Young (2021).

  8. 8.

    “Cosmonaut” in Russian and “Taikonaut” in Chinese.

  9. 9.

    Agreement on the Rescue of Astronauts, the Return of Astronauts and Return of Objects Launched into Outer Space, UNTS, vol. 672, No. 9574, 1967.

  10. 10.

    Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space, Legal Subcommittee (2022) Status of International Agreements relating to Activities in Outer Apace as at 1 January 2022, UN Doc. A/AC.105/C.2/2022/CRP.10, 28 March 2022.

  11. 11.

    Morozova (2022).

  12. 12.

    Lyall (2009), p. 1617.

  13. 13.

    Agreement Governing the Activities of States on the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies, UNTS, vol. 1363, No. 23002.

  14. 14.

    Jakhu (2009), p. 386.

  15. 15.

    Marboe et al. (2013), p. 42.

  16. 16.

    Commercial Space Launch Activities, 49 USC 701, as revised by the Commercial Space Launch Amendments Act 2004, Public Law 108-492, 23.12.2004.

  17. 17.

    40 USC 70102 para. 17, confirmed by 51 US Code, Chapter 509, Commercial Space Launch Activities.

  18. 18.

    Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan on Space Activities, 06.01.2012, No 528-IV, Article 1, para. 19.

  19. 19.

    Artemis Accords – Principles for Cooperation in the Civil Exploration and Use of the Moon, Mars, Comets, and Asteroids for Peaceful Purposes, https://www.nasa.gov/specials/artemis-accords/img/Artemis-Accords-signed-13Oct2020.pdf, accessed 30.11.2022.

  20. 20.

    Outer Space Act, Act no. 409 of 11.05.2016.

  21. 21.

    Federal Law No. 12 on the Regulation of the Space Sector, 19.12.2019.

  22. 22.

    Švamberk (2021).

  23. 23.

    FAI Sporting Code, Section 8 – Astronautics, 2009 Edition, Section 8, para. 2.18.1.

  24. 24.

    Radio Regulations, Edition 2022, Section IV.

  25. 25.

    Article 1 of the Moon Agreement.

  26. 26.

    See Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space, Legal Subcommittee (2022) Status of International Agreements relating to Activities in Outer Apace as at 1 January 2022, UN Doc. A/AC.105/C.2/2022/CRP.10, 28 March 2022.

  27. 27.

    Schmidt-Tedd and Mick (2009), p. 157.

  28. 28.

    Vereshchetin (2006), para. 7.

  29. 29.

    Askin (2019), para. 4.

  30. 30.

    Kamminga (2020), para. 1.

  31. 31.

    Steinorth (2021), para. 9.

  32. 32.

    Compare, Askin (2019), para. 4.

  33. 33.

    See i.a. the Registry of objects launched into outer space maintained online by the Ministry of Transport of the Czech Republic, https://www.spaceportal.cz.

  34. 34.

    Hofmann and Loukakis (2017), p. 18.

  35. 35.

    BGBl. II 2445.

  36. 36.

    Vereshchetin (2006), para. 9.

  37. 37.

    14, CRF § 1214.403 (2006), https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2022-title14-vol5/pdf/CFR-2022-title14-vol5-sec1214-403.pdf, accessed 30.11.2022.

  38. 38.

    Schmidt-Tedd and Mick (2009), p. 159.

  39. 39.

    Vereshchetin (1978), p. 545 ff.

  40. 40.

    Similarly Morozova (2022), p. 2.

  41. 41.

    Cheng (1997), p. 457 ff.

  42. 42.

    Dunk and Goh (2009), p. 98.

  43. 43.

    Dunk and Goh (2009), p. 98.

  44. 44.

    See Dunk and Goh (2009), p. 99.

  45. 45.

    Marboe et al. (2009), p. 52. Article 25 reads: “Each Contracting State undertakes to provide such measures of assistance to aircraft in distress in its territory as it may find practicable, and to permit, subject to control by its own authorities, the owners of the aircraft or authorities of the State in which the aircraft is registered provide such measures of assistance as may be necessitated by the circumstances. Each contracting State, when undertaking search for missing aircraft, will collaborate in coordinated measures which may be recommended from time to time pursuant to this Convention.”

  46. 46.

    Marboe et al. (2009), p. 57.

  47. 47.

    Marboe et al. (2009), p. 59.

  48. 48.

    Morozova (2022), p. 2.

  49. 49.

    Dembling and Arons (1968), p. 630-663.

  50. 50.

    Christol (1982), p. 193.

  51. 51.

    Council of Europe, European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as amended by Protocols Nos. 11 and 14, 04.11.1950, ETS 5.

  52. 52.

    Ribbelink (2009), p. 64.

  53. 53.

    Ribbelink (2009), p. 64.

  54. 54.

    Marboe (2013), p. 135 ff.

  55. 55.

    Schmidt-Tedd and Mick (2009), p. 156.

References

  • Askin E (2019) Economic and social rights, extraterritorial application. In: Peters A (ed) Max Planck encyclopedia of public international law. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Capotorti F (1979) Study on the rights of persons belonging to ethnic, religious and linguistic minorities. E/CN.4/Sub2/384/Rev1

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng B (1997) The legal status of astronauts, studies in international space law. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Christol CQ (1982) The modern international law of outer space. Pergamon Press, Elmsford

    Google Scholar 

  • Dembling PG, Arons DM (1968) The treaty on rescue and return of astronauts and space objects. William Mary Law Rev 9(3):630–663

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann M, Loukakis A (Hrsg) (2017) Ownership of satellites. Nomos, Baden-Baden

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakhu R (2009), Article X. In: Hobe S, Schmidt-Tedd B, Schrogl K-U (eds) Cologne commentary on space law, volume I: outer space treaty. Wolters Kluwer, Cologne

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamminga MT (2020) Extraterritoriality. In: Peters A (ed) Max Planck encyclopedia of public international law. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyall F (2009) Who is an astronaut? The inadequacy of current international law. Acta Astronaut 66(11–12):1613–1617

    Google Scholar 

  • Marboe I (2013) Human rights considerations for space activities. In: Hobe S, Freeland S (eds) In heaven as on earth? The Interaction of Public International Law on the Legal Regulation of Outer Space. Institute of Air and Space Law of the University of Cologne, pp 135–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Marboe I, Neumann J, Schrogl K-U (2009) Article II. In: Hobe S, Schmidt-Tedd B, Schrogl K-U (eds) Cologne commentary on space law, volume I. Wolters Kluwer, Cologne

    Google Scholar 

  • Marboe I, Neumann J, Schrogl K-U (2013) Article 1. In: Hobe S, Schmidt-Tedd B, Schrogl K-U (eds) Cologne commentary on space law, volume II. Wolters Kluwer, Cologne

    Google Scholar 

  • Morozova E (2022) On the 55th anniversary of the rescue agreement: the drafting history and contribution to strengthening international cooperation. In: 73rd International Astronautical Congress (IAC), 18–22 September 2022. IAC-22-E7.IP.3

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribbelink O (2009) Article III. In: Hobe S, Schmidt-Tedd B, Schrogl K-U (eds) Cologne commentary on space law, volume I. Wolters Kluwer, Cologne

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Tedd B, Mick S (2009) Article VIII. In: Hobe S, Schmidt-Tedd B, Schrogl K-U (eds) Cologne commentary on space law, volume I. Wolters Kluwer, Cologne

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinorth C (2021) Bankovic case. In: Peters A (ed) Max Planck encyclopedia of public international law. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Švamberk A (2021) V USA zpřísnili udělování titulu astronaut. Novinky. https://www.novinky.cz/clanek/zahranicni-amerika-v-usa-zprisnili-udelovani-titulu-astronaut-bezos-a-branson-jej-zatim-nemaji-40367089. Accessed 30 Nov 2022

  • Vereshchetin VS (1978) Legal status of international space crews. Ann Air Space Law 3:545–560

    Google Scholar 

  • Vereshchetin VS (2006) Astronauts. In: Wolfrum R (ed) Max Planck encyclopedia of public international law. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • von der Dunk F, Goh GM (2009) Article V. In: Hobe S, Schmidt-Tedd B, Schrogl K-U (eds) Cologne commentary on space law, volume I. Wolters Kluwer, Cologne

    Google Scholar 

  • Young C (2021) SpaceX’s Crew-3 Launched the 600th Person to Space in 60 Years. https://interestingengineering.com/science/spacexs-crew-3-launched-the-600th-person-to-space-in-60-years. Accessed 30 Nov 2022

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahulena Hofmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hofmann, M. (2023). Which Rights Do Have the Astronauts?. In: Donath, P.B., Heger, A., Malkmus, M., Bayrak, O. (eds) Der Schutz des Individuums durch das Recht. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-66978-5_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-66978-5_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-66977-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-66978-5

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics