Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Funktionsweisen als „Währung“ der globalen Gerechtigkeit für Kinder

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethik der Kindheit

  • 195 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Der Fähigkeitenansatz hat sich als wichtige Theorie in der globalen Gerechtigkeitsdebatte etabliert, und er scheint auch gut geeignet zu sein, einen Rahmen für die Diskussion über globale Gerechtigkeit für Kinder zu bieten. Doch obwohl es immer mehr empirische und theoretische Literatur gibt, die den Fähigkeitenansatz auf Kinder und die Phase der Kindheit anwendet, gibt es immer noch nur sehr wenige Arbeiten über dessen philosophische Konzeption von (globaler) Gerechtigkeit für Kinder. Der vorliegende Beitrag möchte diesbezüglich einige Lücken füllen, indem er die Rolle von Funktionsweisen (functionings) als Währung globaler Gerechtigkeit für Kinder hinterfragt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Adams, Harry William. 2008. Justice for Children: Autonomy Development and the State, 1. Aufl. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alstott, Anne. 2004. No Exit: What Parents Owe Their Children and What Society Owes Parents, 1. Aufl. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Elizabeth. 2010. Justifying the Capability Approach to Justice. In Measuring Justice: Primary Goods and Capabilities, 1. Aufl., Hrsg. Harry Brighouse und Ingrid Robeyns, 81–100. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Joel, und Rutger Claassen. 2012. Sailing Alone: Teenage Autonomy and Regimes of Childhood. Law and Philosophy 31(5):495–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-012-9130-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archard, David, und Marit Skivenes. 2009. Balancing a Child’s Best Interests and a Child’s Views. The International Journal of Children’s Rights 17(1):1–21. https://doi.org/10.1163/157181808X358276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagattini, Alexander, und Colin M. Macleod, Hrsg. 2014. The Nature of Children’s Well-Being: Theory and Practice, 1. Aufl. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballet, Jérôme, Mario Biggeri, und Flavio Comim. 2011. Children’s Agency and the Capability Approach: A Conceptual Framework. In Children and the Capability Approach, 1. Aufl., Hrsg. Mario Biggeri, Jérôme Ballet, und Flavio Comim, 22–45. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bang, Brandy, Paige L. Baker, Alexis Carpinteri, und Vincent B. Van Hasselt. 2014. Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children, 1. Aufl. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01878-2.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barth, J., L. Bermetz, E. Heim, S. Trelle, und T. Tonia. 2013. The Current Prevalence of Child Sexual Abuse Worldwide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Public Health 58(3):469–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-012-0426-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betzler, Monika. 2011. Erziehung Zur Autonomie Als Elternpflicht. Deutsche Zeitschrift Für Philosophie 59(6):937–953. https://doi.org/10.1524/dzph.2011.0074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggeri, Mario, Jérôme. Ballet, und Flavio Comim, Hrsg. 2011. Children and the Capability Approach, 1. Aufl. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggeri, Mario, und Santosh Mehrotra. 2011. Child Poverty as Capability Deprivation: How to Choose Domains of Child Well-Being and Poverty. In Children and the Capability Approach, 1. Aufl., Hrsg. Mario Biggeri, Jérôme Ballet, und Flavio Comim, 46–75. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, Samantha. 2014. The Goods of Childhood, Children’s Rights, and the Role of Parents as Advocates and Interpreters. In Family-Making: Contemporary Ethical Challenges, Hrsg. Françoise Baylis und Carolyn Macleod. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brighouse, Harry. 2003. How Should Children Be Heard? Arizona Law Review 45(3):691–711.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, Gillian. 2017. Global Justice. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2017 Edition), Hrsg. Edward Zalta. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/justice-global/.

  • Carel, Havi, und Gita Györffy. 2014. Seen but Not Heard: Children and Epistemic Injustice. The Lancet 384(9950):1256–1257. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61759-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeKeyser, Robert M. 2000. THE ROBUSTNESS OF CRITICAL PERIOD EFFECTS IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 22(4):499–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, Rosalind, und Martha Nussbaum. 2012. Children’s Rights and a Capabilities Approach: The Question of Special Priority. Cornell Law Review 97:549–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domínguez-Serrano, Mónica, Lucía del Moral-Espín, und Lina Gálvez Muñoz. 2018. A Well-Being of Their Own: Children’s Perspectives of Well-Being from the Capabilities Approach. Childhood October. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568218804872.

  • Franklin-Hall, Andrew. 2013. On Becoming an Adult: Autonomy and the Moral Relevance of Life’s Stages. The Philosophical Quarterly 63(251):223–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9213.12014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, William. 2015. The Developmental Capability Model of Child Well-Being. In The Well-Being of Children: Philosophical and Social Scientific Approaches, 1. Aufl., Hrsg. Gunter Graf und Gottfried Schweiger, 68–83. Berlin: DeGruyter Open.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gheaus, Anca. 2015. The Intrinsic Goods of Childhood and the Just Society. In The Nature of Children’s Well-Being, 1. Aufl., Hrsg. Alexander Bagattini und Colin M. Macleod, 35–52. 9. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giesinger, Johannes. 2017. The Special Goods of Childhood: Lessons from Social Constructionism. Ethics and Education 12(2):201–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2017.1314168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gittins, Diana. 2009. The Historical Construction of Childhood”. In An Introduction to Childhood Studies, 2. Aufl., Hrsg. Mary Jane Kehily. Maidenhead: MacGraw-Hill Open Universtiy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graf, Gunter, und Gottfried Schweiger, Hrsg. 2015. The Well-Being of Children: Philosophical and Social Scientific Approaches, 1. Aufl. Berlin: DeGruyter Open.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graf, Gunter, und Gottfried Schweiger, Hrsg. 2017. Ethics and the Endangerment of Children’s Bodies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, Sarah. 2017. Why Childhood Is Bad for Children. Journal of Applied Philosophy, January. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, Caroline, Bernhard Babic, und Mario Biggeri, Hrsg. 2014. Agency and Participation in Childhood and Youth: International Applications of the Capability Approach in Schools and Beyond, 1. Aufl. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelleher, J. Paul. 2015. Capabilities versus Resources. Journal of Moral Philosophy 12:151–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lansdown, Gerison. 2005. The Evolving Capacities of the Child. 11. Innocenti Insight. Florence: UNICEF International Child Development Centre. https://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/384-the-evolving-capacities-of-the-child.html.

  • Macleod, Colin M. 2010. Primary Goods, Capabilities and Children. In Measuring Justice – Primary Goods and Capabilities, Hrsg. Harry Brighouse und Ingrid Robeyns, 174–192. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mullin, Amy. 2014. Children, Paternalism and the Development of Autonomy. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17(3):413–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-013-9453-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, Martha. 2011. Creating Capabilities : The Human Development Approach, 1. Aufl. Cambridge/London: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oosterlaken, Ilse. 2012. Is Pogge a Capability Theorist in Disguise? A Critical Examination of Thomas Pogge’s Defence of Rawlsian Resourcism. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16(1):205–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-012-9344-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robeyns, Ingrid. 2003. Sen’s Capability Approach and Gender Inequality: Selecting Relevant Capabilities. Feminist Economics 9(2–3):61–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354570022000078024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robeyns, Ingrid. 2005. The Capability Approach: A Theoretical Survey. Journal of Human Development 6(1):93–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/146498805200034266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robeyns, Ingrid. 2006. The Capability Approach in Practice. The Journal of Political Philosophy 14(3):351–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2006.00263.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satz, Debra. 2010. Why Some Things Should Not Be for Sale: The Moral Limits of Markets, 1. Aufl. Oxford Political Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweiger, Gottfried, und Gunter Graf. 2015. A Philosophical Examination of Social Justice and Child Poverty, 1. Aufl. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. http://www.palgraveconnect.com/doifinder/10.1057/9781137426024.

  • Sen, Amartya. 2009. The Idea of Justice, 1. Aufl. London/New York: Lane.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stoecklin, Daniel, und Jean-Michel. Bonvin, Hrsg. 2014. Children’s Rights and the Capability Approach: Challenges and Prospects, 1. Aufl. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tisdall, E. Kay M., John M Davis, Alan Prout, und Malcolm Hill, Hrsg. 2006. Children, Young People and Social Inclusion: Participation for What?, 1. Aufl. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unterhalter, Elaine. 2005. Global Inequality, Capabilities, Social Justice: The Millennium Development Goal for Gender Equality in Education. International Journal of Educational Development 25(2):111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2004.11.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Melanie, und Elaine Unterhalter, Hrsg. 2010. Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach and Social Justice in Education, 1. Aufl. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, Jonathan, und Avner de-Shalit. 2007. Disadvantage, 1. Aufl. Oxford Political Theory. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, Jonathan, und Avner de-Shalit. 2013. On Fertile Functionings: A Response to Martha Nussbaum. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 14(1):161–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2013.762177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yousefzadeh, Sepideh, Mario Biggeri, Caterina Arciprete, und Hinke Haisma. 2018. A Capability Approach to Child Growth. Child Indicators Research, April. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-018-9548-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Zentrum für Ethik und Armutsforschung, Universität Salzburg, Salzburg, Österreich

    Gottfried Schweiger

Authors
  1. Gottfried Schweiger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gottfried Schweiger .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schweiger, G. (2023). Funktionsweisen als „Währung“ der globalen Gerechtigkeit für Kinder. In: Ethik der Kindheit. Kindheit – Bildung – Erziehung. Philosophische Perspektiven. J.B. Metzler, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-66692-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-66692-0_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: J.B. Metzler, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-66691-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-66692-0

  • eBook Packages: J.B. Metzler Humanities (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation