Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Kindheit und Gerechtigkeit

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethik der Kindheit

  • 196 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Fragen der Gerechtigkeit gehören zu den aktuellsten und meistdiskutierten der praktischen Philosophie der Gegenwart. Das Theorieangebot ist groß und zu vielen drängenden Herausforderungen unserer Zeit gibt es mittlerweile eine sehr große Zahl an wertvollen und ausdifferenzierten philosophischen Beiträgen aus Sicht der Gerechtigkeitstheorie. So sind beispielsweise die Themen der globalen Gerechtigkeit, der Gerechtigkeit zwischen den Generationen und der Gerechtigkeit gegenüber Tieren oder der Umwelt in der aktuellen Debatte sehr präsent und auf einem hohen theoretischen Niveau angelangt.

Gemeinsam mit Gunter Graf

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Adams, Harry William. 2008. Justice for children: Autonomy development and the state, 1. Aufl. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alstott, Anne. 2004. No exit: What parents owe their children and what society owes parents, 1. Aufl. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Elizabeth. 1999. What is the point of equality? Ethics 102(2):287–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Elizabeth. 2007. Fair Opportunity in Education: A democratic equality perspective. Ethics 117(4):595–622. https://doi.org/10.1086/518806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Elizabeth. 2010. „Justifying the capability approach to justice“. In Measuring justice: primary goods and capabilities, 1. Aufl., Hrsg. Harry Brighouse und Ingrid Robeyns, 81–100. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archard, David. 2004. Children: Rights and childhood, 2. Aufl. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archard, David. 2010. The family: A liberal defence. Basingstoke, Hampshire/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Archard, David, und Marit Skivenes. 2009. Balancing a child’s best interests and a child’s views. The International Journal of Children’s Rights 17(1):1–21. https://doi.org/10.1163/157181808X358276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arneson, Richard. 2006. „Distributive justice and basic capability equality: “good enough” is not good enough“. In Capabilities equality: basic issues and problems, Hrsg. Alexander Kaufman, 17–43. Routledge innovations in political theory 18. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagattini, Alexander, und Colin M. Macleod, Hrsg. 2014. The nature of children’s well-being: Theory and practice, 1. Aufl. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brighouse, Harry, und Ingrid Robeyns, Hrsg. 2010. Measuring justice: Primary goods and capabilities, 1. Aufl. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brighouse, Harry, und Adam Swift. 2006. Parents’ rights and the value of the family. Ethics 117(1):80–108. https://doi.org/10.1086/508034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brighouse, Harry, und Adam Swift. 2014. Family values: The ethics of parent-child relationships, 1. Aufl. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cabezas, Mar, Gunter Graf, und Gottfried Schweiger. 2014. Health, justice, and happiness during childhood. South African Journal of Philosophy 33(4):501–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/02580136.2014.967593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casal, Paula. 2007. Why sufficiency is not enough. Ethics 117(2):296–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Gerald Allan. 1989. On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice. Ethics 99(4):906–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowden, Mhairi. 2012. What’s love got to do with it? Why a child does not have a right to be loved. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15(3):325–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2011.572426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deveaux, Monique. 2015. The global poor as agents of justice. Journal of Moral Philosophy 12(2):125–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, Rosalind, und Martha Nussbaum. 2012. Children’s rights and a capabilities approach: The question of special priority. Chicago Public Law & Legal Theory Working Paper, Nr. 384. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2060614.

  • Dworkin, Ronald. 2000. Sovereign virtue: The theory and practice of equality. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferracioli, Luara. 2015. The state’s duty to ensure children are loved. Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy 8(2):1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurt, Harry. 1987. Equality as a moral ideal. Ethics 98(1):21–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin-Hall, Andrew. 2013. On becoming an adult: Autonomy and the moral relevance of life’s stages. The Philosophical Quarterly 63(251):223–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9213.12014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gheaus, Anca. 2014. The intrinsic goods of childhood and the just society. In: The nature of children’s well-being, Hrsg. Alexander Bagattini und Colin M. Macleod, 35–52. Heidelberg and New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giesinger, Johannes. 2007. Autonomie und Verletzlichkeit: der moralische Status von Kindern und die Rechtfertigung von Erziehung. Bielefeld: Transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graf, Gunter, und Gottfried Schweiger. 2015. A philosophical examination of social justice and child poverty, 1. Aufl. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann, Amy. 1999. Democratic education. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, S. Matthew. 2006. The right of children to be loved. Journal of Political Philosophy 14(4):420–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2006.00262.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macleod, Colin M. 2007. Raising children: Who is responsible for what?. In Taking responsibility for children, 1. Aufl., Hrsg. Samantha Brennan und Robert Noggle, 1–18. Studies in childhood and family in Canada. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macleod, Colin M. 2010. Primary goods, capabilities and children. In Measuring justice – primary goods and capabilities, Hrsg. Harry Brighouse und Ingrid Robeyns, 174–92. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macleod, Colin M. 2013. Justice, educational equality, and sufficiency. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 40:151–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, David. 1999. Principles of social justice, 1. Aufl. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullin, Amy. 2013. „Children, vulnerability, and emotional harm“. In Vulnerability, 1. Aufl., Hrsg. Catriona Mackenzie, Wendy Rogers, und Susan Dodds, 266–87. New York: Oxford University Press. view/http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199316649.001.0001/acprof-9780199316649-chapter-12.

  • Munn, Nick. 2016. „Capacity, consistency and the young“. In Justice and the Politics of Childhood, 1. Aufl., Hrsg. Johannes Drerup, Gunter Graf, Christoph Schickhardt, und Gottfried Schweiger (im Erscheinen). Dordrecht/New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsaretti, Serena. 2013. Children as public goods? Philosophy & Public Affairs 41(3):226–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.12019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, Onora. 2001. Agents of justice. Metaphilosophy 32(1–2):180–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9973.00181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 1975. Eine Theorie der Gerechtigkeit, 1. Aufl. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schickhardt, Christoph. 2012. Kinderethik: der moralische Status und die Rechte der Kinder. Münster: Mentis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweiger, Gottfried. 2015. „Verletzbarkeit und Autonomie im Lebenslauf: Zur Besonderheit der Kinderarmut aus anerkennungstheoretischer Perspektive“. Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie 2(2):401–420. https://doi.org/10.1515/zksp-2015-0018.

  • Sen, Amartya. 1980. „Equality of what?“. In The Tanner Lectures on Human Value, 1. Aufl., Hrsg. Sterling M McMurrin, 195–220. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya. 1992. Inequality reexamined, 1. Aufl. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya. 2009. The idea of justice. 1. Aufl. London/New York: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Melanie, und Elaine Unterhalter, Hrsg. 2010. Amartya Sen’s capability approach and social justice in education, 1. Aufl. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, Iris Marion. 2011. Responsibility for justice. Oxford political philosophy. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Zentrum für Ethik und Armutsforschung, Universität Salzburg, Salzburg, Österreich

    Gottfried Schweiger

Authors
  1. Gottfried Schweiger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gottfried Schweiger .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schweiger, G. (2023). Kindheit und Gerechtigkeit. In: Ethik der Kindheit. Kindheit – Bildung – Erziehung. Philosophische Perspektiven. J.B. Metzler, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-66692-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-66692-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: J.B. Metzler, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-66691-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-66692-0

  • eBook Packages: J.B. Metzler Humanities (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation