Skip to main content

Poeticising Emotion in the Sonnets of the Sidney-Pembroke Circle

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Spielräume des Affektiven
  • 287 Accesses

Abstract

In late sixteenth-century England Sir Philip Sidney followed Petrarca’s model in composing Astrophil and Stella, a cycle of sonnets which records the poet’s unrequited love for a courtly lady. Composing poetry helps the poet to verbalize his emotions (including sadness, despair, fear, satisfaction and triumph) and come to terms with his passion. Furthermore, Sidney (on the basis of Platonic philosophy) revaluates his desires and directs them towards a pursuit of virtue. The poet’s sister, the Countess of Pembroke, obviously made use of Sidney’s sonnets for the purpose of self-fashioning, inspiring the composition of further sonnet cycles on the model of Sidney’s, including Daniel’s, Drayton’s and, apparently, Shakespeare’s. In all of these sonnet cycles the absence of sexual fulfilment spiritualizes the emotion of love and ennobles a love relationship. This central motif certainly fits in with cultural politics of Mary Countess of Pembroke which aimed at combating “barbarism” and fixing the Pembroke household as a centre of English letters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    On Petrarca’s “reputation as a poet of selfhood” and his “habits of introspection” which “opened into the wider imaginative space of interiority” cf. Whittington 2016, p. 84.

  2. 2.

    Byron 1982, 3.8.8–9.

  3. 3.

    Quoted from: Byron 1982.

  4. 4.

    Cf. Whittington 2016, pp. 84–85.

  5. 5.

    Burckhardt 1988; concerning passions cf. esp. pp. 311–332.

  6. 6.

    Strier 2004, p. 23.

  7. 7.

    On “Renaissance self-fashioning” cf. e.g. Greenblatt 1980. Cf. also Javitch 1978 on the analogies between the Renaissance ideal of courtliness and contemporary poetic conventions, and Marotti 1995 (pp. 214–218) on the social implications of Tottel’s Miscellany (1557), in which Wyatt’s and Surrey’s sonnets were first printed.

  8. 8.

    See e.g. Berry 1998, p. 106.

  9. 9.

    Duncan-Jones 1985, p. xiii.

  10. 10.

    On the practice of circulating poetry in manuscript form see Marotti 1995, 1–73.

  11. 11.

    Cf. Kullmann 2019, esp. p. 155.

  12. 12.

    See Hannay 1990, esp. pp. 78–142. Cf. also Marotti 1995 (pp. 312–313) on the Countess’s assumption of “proprietary rights to her brother’s literary remains”.

  13. 13.

    Quoted from: Sidney 1997.

  14. 14.

    On Sidney’s Platonism and its antecedents in Castiglione’s Cortegiano cf. Roe 1994, esp. 103–107, and Kullmann 2019, pp. 148–151.

  15. 15.

    Cf. Knecht 2021, p. 5.

  16. 16.

    As Katherine Duncan-Jones notices the sonnets and songs from sonnet 86 onwards document the ‘disintegration’ of the relationship between Astrophil and Stella (Duncan-Jones 1991, p. 245).

  17. 17.

    On the “affective turn” which privileges humoral pathology as the central 16th-century discourse with regard to emotions cf. Knecht 2021, pp. 6–8.

  18. 18.

    Hannay 1990, p. 60.

  19. 19.

    Cf. Hannay 1990, pp. 107–109, 127–129.

  20. 20.

    Quoted from Hannay 1990, p. 121.

  21. 21.

    Cf. e.g. Floyd-Wilson 2004, esp. pp. 140–142.

  22. 22.

    Lamb 1982; Hannay 1990, pp. 106–142, esp. 109–110, 112.

  23. 23.

    Daniel 2013.

  24. 24.

    Cf. Hannay 1990, pp. 116–118.

  25. 25.

    Hannay 1990, p. 117.

  26. 26.

    We may notice that Sidney’s Stella is “virtuous” but never “chaste”. She is married to Lord Rich, while Delia is evidently a “maid” (1.13) – which renders her identification with the Countess of Pembroke (a mother of four) unlikely.

  27. 27.

    Quoted from: Drayton 2017.

  28. 28.

    Hannay 1990, p. 115.

  29. 29.

    Auden 1965, p. xxix.

  30. 30.

    For a survey cf. e.g. Schiffer 2000. Cf. also Stallybrass 2000.

  31. 31.

    Quoted from: Shakespeare’s Sonnets, 1997, p. 109.

  32. 32.

    While the “myth” that sonnets 1–126 are addressed to a young man (and to one man only) has recently been challenged (as in Edmondson, Wells 2020, pp. 22–23, 26–32), I still find it basically convincing. As discussed below, none of the 126 sonnets refers to an attempt to seduce the addressee, or contains an account of her/his refusal – which would be untypical for sonnets addressed to a woman. Cf. also de Grazia 2000, esp. 96–99 and Dubrow 2000.

  33. 33.

    Shakespeare 1978, xxvi. Other pieces of evidence are listed in Duncan-Jones 1997, pp. 66–69.

  34. 34.

    Hannay 1990, p. 122.

  35. 35.

    Hannay 1990, pp. 122–123.

  36. 36.

    Hannay 1990, p. 123.

  37. 37.

    See e.g. Melchiori 1998, pp. 12–13.

  38. 38.

    For a survey of some of these projects see Kullmann 2008.

  39. 39.

    Hannay 1990, p. 121.

  40. 40.

    Hannay 1990, pp. 121–122.

  41. 41.

    Shakespeare’s Sonnets 1997, sonnet 95.3, note.

  42. 42.

    Shakespeare’s Sonnets 1997, sonnet 96.2, note.

  43. 43.

    Kullmann 2010, p. 51, note 18.

  44. 44.

    This can certainly be inferred from the dedication of Barnfield’s Affecionate Shepherd to Lady Penelope Rich; Barnfield 1990, p. 79.

  45. 45.

    The assumption that Shakespeare in sonnet 20 characterizes his love for the young man as non-sexual has sometimes been contested; cf. e.g. Pointner 2003, pp. 89–110. As the literal meaning fits in with the absence of expressions of desire in the rest of the young man sonnets, I see no reason to consider it invalid.

  46. 46.

    Jackson 2001, and Edmondson, Wells 2020, pp. 24–26. Cf. also Kullmann 2010, p. 51.

  47. 47.

    As Helen Vendler notices, “the speaker of Shakespeare’s sonnets scorns the consolations of Christianity”, Vendler 1997, p. 25. Vendler, however, does not comment on the antecedents of this ‘scorn’ in Daniel’s Delia sequence.

  48. 48.

    Cf. Schoenfeldt 2000, esp. pp. 310–312.

  49. 49.

    Gumbrecht 2010, p. 5.

  50. 50.

    As has been noted, the sonnet sequence illustrates the “chasm between flesh and spirit”, a notion which was central to sixteenth-century theological debates; see e.g. Freinkel 2000, p. 255.

  51. 51.

    Cf. also Stephen Medcalf’s analysis of Neoplatonic elements in Shakespeare’s “The Phoenix and the Turtle”, Medcalf 1994, pp. 119–121.

  52. 52.

    Cf. Kullmann 1999.

  53. 53.

    Cf. Hannay 1990, pp. 137–142.

  54. 54.

    These four words formed the Countess of Pembroke’s epitaph, and originated in an elegy by William Browne (Hannay 1990, p. ix). While from today’s point of view these words seem to “present her in a diminished role”, they were obviously meant to summarize the Countess’s pivotal position in English letters.

  55. 55.

    Cf. de Grazia 2000, pp. 91–96.

Literatur

  • Auden, W. H. 1965. Introduction. In William Shakespeare, The Sonnets, ed. William Burto. Signet Classic edition, xvii–xxxviii. New York: New American Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnfield, Richard. 1990. The Complete Poems, ed. Goerge Klawitter. Selinsgrove: Susquehanna University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, Edward. 1998. The Making of Sir Philip Sidney. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byron (Lord), George Gordon. 1982. Don Juan, ed. T. G. Steffan, E. Steffan and W. W. Pratt. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burckhardt, Jacob. 1988. Die Kultur der Renaissance in Italien: Ein Versuch, 11th ed. Stuttgart: Kröner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, Samuel. 2013. Delia, ed. Mark Tuley. Maidstone: Crescent Moon Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drayton, Michael. 2017. Sonnets: Includes the Amour & Idea Sonnet Cycles. Portable Poetry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubrow, Heather. 2000. ’Incertainties now crown themselves assur’d’: The Politics of Plotting Shakespeare’s Sonnets. In Shakespeare’s Sonnets: Critical Essays, ed. James Schiffer, 113–133. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan-Jones, Katherine. 1985. Introduction. In Sir Philip Sidney. The Old Arcadia, ed. Katherine Duncan-Jones, vii–xvi. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan-Jones, Katherine. 1991. Sir Philip Sidney: Courtier Poet. London: Hamish Hamilton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan-Jones, Katherine. 1997. Introduction. In Shakespeare’s Sonnets, ed. Katherine Duncan-Jones, 1–105. The Arden Shakespeare. Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, Paul and Stanley Wells. 2020. Introduction. In William Shakespeare. All the Sonnets of Shakespeare, eds. Paul Edmondson and Stanley Wells, 1–37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floyd-Wilson, Mary. 2004. English Mettle. In Reading the Early Modern Passions: Essays in the Cultural History of Emotions, eds. Gail Kern Paster, Katherine Rowe, Mary Floyd-Wilson, 130–146. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freinkel, Lisa. 2000. The Name of the Rose: Christian Figurality and Shakespeare’s Sonnets. In Shakespeare’s Sonnets: Critical Essays, ed. James Schiffer, 241–258. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grazia, Margreta de. 2000. The Scandal of Shakespeare’s Sonnets. In Shakespeare’s Sonnets: Critical Essays, ed. James Schiffer, 89–112. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenblatt, Stephen. 1980. Renaissance Self-Fashioning: From More to Shakespeare. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumbrecht, Hans Ulrich. Touched by Shakespeare’s World. In Shakespeare’s Sonnets: Loves, Layers, Languages, ed. Sonja Fielitz, 1–9. Heidelberg: Winter, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannay, Margaret P. 1990. Philip’s Phoenix: Mary Sidney, Countess of Pembroke. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Macdonald P. 2001. Vocabulary and Chronology: The Case of Shakespeare’s Sonnets. The Review of English Studies, n.s. 52: 59–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Javitch, Daniel. 1978. Poetry and Courtliness in Renaissance England. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knecht, Ross. 2021. The Grammar Rules of Affection: Passion and Pedagogy in Sidney, Shakespeare, and Jonson. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kullmann, Thomas. 1999. Courtliness and Platonism in the English Renaissance. In Anglistentag 1998 Erfurt: Proceedings, eds. Fritz-Wilhelm Neumann and Sabine Schülting, 199–209. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kullmann, Thomas. 2008. Shakespeare and Peace. In Shakespeare and War, eds. Ros King and Paul J.C.M. Franssen, 43–55. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kullmann, Thomas. 2010. Shakespeare and the Love of Boys. In Shakespeare’s Sonnets: Loves, Layers, Languages, ed. Sonja Fielitz, 43–54. Heidelberg: Winter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kullmann, Thomas. 2019. The Construction of Female Nobility in Sir Philip Sidney’s Astrophil and Stella. Virtus 26: 146–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, Mary Ellen. 1982. The Countess of Pembroke’s Patronage. English Literary Renaissance 12: 162 –179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marotti, Arthur F. 1995. Manuscript, Print, and the English Renaissance Lyric. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Medcalf, Stephen. 1994. Shakespeare on Beauty, Truth and Transcendence. In Platonism and the English Imagination, eds. Anna Baldwin and Sarah Hutton, 117–125. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Melchiori, Giorgio. 1998. Introduction. In King Edward III, ed. Giorgio Melchiori. The New Cambridge Shakespeare, 1–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pointner, Frank Erik. 2003. Bawdy and Soul: a Revaluation of Shakespeare’s Sonnets. Heidelberg: Winter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roe, John. 1994. Italian Neoplatonism and the Poetry of Sidney, Shakespeare, Chapman, and Donne. In Platonism and the English Imagination, eds. Anna Baldwin and Sarah Hutton, 100–116. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, James. 2000. Reading New Life into Shakespeare’s Sonnets: a Suvey of Criticism. In Shakespeare’s Sonnets: Critical Essays, ed. James Schiffer, 3–72. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeldt, Michael. 2000. The Matter of Inwardness: Shakespeare’s Sonnets. In Shakespeare’s Sonnets: Critical Essays, ed. James Schiffer, 305–324. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, William, 1978. The Complete Works, ed. Peter Alexander. London: Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, William. 1997. Shakespeare’s Sonnets, ed. Katherine Duncan-Jones. The Arden Shakespeare. Walton-on-Thames: Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidney, Sir Philip. 1997. Defence of Poesie, Astrophil and Stella and Other Writings, ed. Elizabeth Porges Watson. London: Dent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stallybrass, Peter. 2000. Editing as Cultural Formation: The Sexing of Shakespeare’s Sonnets. In Shakespeare’s Sonnets: Critical Essays, ed. James Schiffer, 75–88. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strier, Richard. 2004. Against the Rule of Reason: Praise of Passion from Petrarch to Luther to Shakespeare to Herbert. In Reading the Early Modern Passions: Essays in the Cultural History of Emotion, eds. Gail Kern Paster, Katherine Rowe and Mary Floyd-Wilson, 23–42. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vendler, Helen. 1997. The Art of Shakespeare’s Sonnets. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, Leah. 2016. Renaissance Suppliants: Poetry, Antiquity, Reconciliation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Kullmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kullmann, T. (2023). Poeticising Emotion in the Sonnets of the Sidney-Pembroke Circle. In: Bremer, K., Grewe, A., Rühl, M. (eds) Spielräume des Affektiven. J.B. Metzler, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-66151-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-66151-2_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: J.B. Metzler, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-66150-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-66151-2

  • eBook Packages: J.B. Metzler Humanities (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics