Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Psychometrische Eigenschaften

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Leadership 4.0 – Effektive Führung in der Arbeit 4.0

Part of the book series: SpringerTests ((ST))

  • 2898 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Für den Einsatz von neu entwickelten Fragebögen z. B.in der organisationalen Praxis werden wesentliche psychometrische Eigenschaften wie z. B. Objektivität und Validität ermittelt. Anhand von Daten aus mehreren empirischen Studien wurden diese Eigenschaften auch für den Leadership 4.0 – Fragebogen analysiert. Es folgt eine Zusammenfassung der Ergebnisse zu den psychometrischen Eigenschaften des Instrumentes, die aus Daten der ersten und zweiten Studie (s. Abschn. 3.2) gewonnen werden konnten.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Ahmad, H., & Gelaidan, H. (2011). Organisational culture, leadership styles and employee’s affective commitment to change: A case of Yemen Public Sector. Journal of Organizational Management Studies, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5171/2011.722551.

  • Al Sahi, A. L., Zaabi, M. S., Ahmad, K. Z., & Hossan, C. (2016). Authentic leadership, work engagement and organizational citizenship behaviors in petroleum company. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 65, 811–830. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-01-2016-0023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x.

  • Aneshensel, C. S. (1992). Social stress: Theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 15–38. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.18.080192.000311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azeez, R. O., Jayeoba, F., & Adeoye, A. O. (2016). Job satisfaction, turnover intention and organizational commitment. BVIMSR’s Journal of Management Research, 8, 102–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babcock-Roberson, M. E., & Strickland, O. J. (2010). The relationship between charismatic leadership, work engagement, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Journal of psychology, 144, 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223981003648336.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernerth, J. B., Armenakis, A. A., Feild, H. S., & Walker, H. J. (2007). Justice, cynicism, and commitment. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43, 303–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886306296602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boles, J. S., Johnston, M. W., Hair, J. F., & JR. (1997). Role stress, work-family conflict and emotional exhaustion: Inter-relationships and effects on some work-related consequences. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 17, 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, S., & Peus, C. (2018). Crossover of work–life balance perceptions: Does authentic leadership matter? Journal of Business Ethics, 149, 875–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, S., Peus, C., Weisweiler, S., & Frey, D. (2013). Transformational leadership, job satisfaction, and team performance: A multilevel mediation model of trust. The Leadership Quarterly, 24, 270–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.11.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bühner, M. (2011). Einführung in die Test- und Fragebogenkonstruktion. Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS; Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S., & Herbert, T. B. (1996). Health psychology: Psychological factors and physical disease from the perspective of human psychoneuroimmunology. Annual review of psychology, 47, 113–142. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conner, D. R., & Patterson, R. W. (1982). Building commitment to organizational change. Training & Development Journal, 36, 18–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, A. L., Horner, M. T., & Payne, S. C. (2008). In search of the antecedents of commitment to organizational change. Paper presented at the 23rd annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, April, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. CreateSpace Independent Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & van Engen, M. L. (2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 569–591.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Emery, C. R., & Barker, K. J. (2007). The effect of transactional and transformational leadership styles on the organizational commitment and job satisfaction of cumstomer contact personnel. Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications and Conflict, 11, 77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Euwema, M. C., Wendt, H., & van Emmerik, H. (2007). Leadership styles and group organizational citizenship behavior across cultures. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 1035–1057. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fedor, D. B., Calswell, S., & Herold, D. M. (2006). The effects of organizational changes on employee commitment: A multilevel investigation. Personnel Psychology, 59, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00852.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, R. D. (2010). Resistance, justice, and commitment to change. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 21, 3–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.20035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong, Y., Law, K. S., Chang, S., & Xin, K. R. (2009). Human resources management and firm performance: The differential role of managerial affective and continuance commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013116.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harms, P. D., Credé, M., Tynan, M., Leon, M., & Jeung, W. (2017). Leadership and stress: A meta-analytic review. The Leadership Quarterly, 28, 178–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.10.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinitz, K., & Rowold, J. (2007). Gütekriterien einer deutschen Adaptation des Transformational Leadership Inventory (TLI) von Podsakoff. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O, 51, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herscovitch, L., & Meyer, J. P. (2002). Commitment to organizational change: Extension of a three-component model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 474–487. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.474.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iaffaldano, M. T., & Muchinsky, P. M. (1985). Job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 251–273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.97.2.251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jalagat, R. (2016). Job performance, job satisfaction, and motivation: A critical reviewof their relationship. International Journal of Advances in Management and Economics, 5, 36–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Bono, J. E., & Patton, G. K. (2001). The job satisfaction-job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 376–407. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.376.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., Heller, D., & Mount, M. K. (2002). Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 530–541. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.530.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kanste, O., Miettunen, J., & Kyngäs, H. (2007). Psychometric properties of the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire among nurses. Journal of advanced nursing, 57, 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04100.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Khamisa, N., Oldenburg, B., Peltzer, K., & Ilic, D. (2015). Work related stress, burnout, job satisfaction and general health of nurses. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12, 652–666. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120100652.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kooij, D. T. A. M., Jansen, P. G. W., Dikkers, J. S. E., & de Lange, A. H. (2010). The influence of age on the associations between HR practices and both affective commitment and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 1111–1136. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubinger, K. D. (2002). Personality questionnaires: Some critical points of view. Psychologische Beiträge, 44, 50–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubinger, K. D. (2019). Psychologische Diagnostik; Theorie und Praxis psychologischen Diagnostizierens. Hogrefe.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Litzcke, S., Schuh, H., & Pletke, M. (2013). Stress, Mobbing und Burn-out am Arbeitsplatz. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Loher, B. T., Noe, R. A., Moeller, N. L., & Fitzgerald, M. P. (1985). A meta-analysis of the relation of job characteristics to job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 280–289. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.70.2.280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoud, A. B., Reisel, W. D., Fuxman, L., & Mohr, I. (2020). A motivational standpoint of job insecurity effects on organizational citizenship behaviors: A generational study. Scandinavian journal of psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12689.

  • McAllister, D. J., Kamdar, D., Morrison, E. W., & Turban, D. B. (2007). Disentangling role perceptions: How perceived role breadth, discretion, instrumentality, and efficacy relate to helping and taking charge. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1200–1211. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Medley, F., & Larochelle, D. R. (1995). Transformational leadership and job satisfaction. Nursing Management, 26, 64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meurs, J. A., & Perrewé, P. L. (2011). Cognitive activation theory of stress: An integrative theoretical approach to work stress. Journal of Management, 37, 1043–1068. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310387303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace; Theory, research, and application. SAGE Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 20–52. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaelis, B., Stegmaier, R., & Sonntag, K. (2009). Affective commitment to change and innovation implementation behavior: The role of Charismatic Leadership and Employees’ trust in top management. Journal of Change Management, 9, 399–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697010903360608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, G., & Rigotti, T. (2009). Berufliche Bedingungen. In J. Bengel & M. Jerusalem (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Gesundheitspsychologie und medizinischen Psychologie (S. 156–163). Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moosbrugger, H., & Kelava, A. (2008). Qualitätsanforderungen an einen psychologischen Test (Testgütekriterien). In H. Moosbrugger & A. Kelava (Hrsg.), Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion (S. 7–26). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mowday, R. T. (1982). Expectancy theory approaches to faculty motivation. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1982, 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.37219821008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(79)90072-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowday, R., Porter, L., & Steers, R. (1982). The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mummendey, H. D. (1995). Die Fragebogen-Methode. Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neves, P., & Caetano, A. (2006). Social exchange processes in organizational change: The roles of trust and control. Journal of Change Management, 6, 351–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697010601054008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nübling, M. (2005). Methoden zur Erfassung psychischer Belastungen; Erprobung eines Messinstrumentes (COPSOQ); [Abschlussbericht zum Projekt „Methoden zur Erfassung psychischer Belastungen – Erprobung eines Messinstrumentes (COPSOQ)“ – Projekt F 1885. Wirtschaftsverl. NW Verl. für Neue Wiss.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odoardi, C., Battistelli, A., Montani, F., & Peiró, J. M. (2019). Affective commitment, participative leadership, and employee innovation: A multilevel investigation. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 35, 103–113. https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2019a12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organ, D. W. (1988). Issues in organization and management series. Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington Books/D. C. Heath and Com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, L. C., & Moomaw, W. (2005). The relationship between teacher autonomy and stress, work satisfaction, empowerment, and professionalism. Educational Research Quarterly, 29, 38–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, M. M., McGee, G. W., & Cavender, J. W. (1984). A meta-analysis of the relationships between individual job satisfaction and individual performance. Academy of Management Review, 9, 712–721. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4277608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, N. P., Whiting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Blume, B. D. (2009). Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 122–141. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013079.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Impact of organizational citizenship behavior on organizational performance: A review and suggestion for future research. Human Performance, 10, 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002_5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 1, 107–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riaz, A., & Hussain Haider, M. (2010). Role of transformational and transactional leadership on job satisfaction and career satisfaction. Business and Economic Horizons, 1, 29–38. https://doi.org/10.15208/beh.2010.05.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro, N., Yücel, İ., & Gomes, D. (2018). How transformational leadership predicts employees’ affective commitment and performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 67, 1901–1917. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-09-2017-0229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rost, J. (1996). Lehrbuch Testtheorie, Testkonstruktion. Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowold, J., & Heinitz, K. (2008). Führungsstile als Stressbarrieren. Zeitschrift für Personalpsychologie, 7, 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1026/1617-6391.7.3.129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowold, J., Borgmann, L., & Bormann, K. (2014). Which leadership constructs are important for predicting job satisfaction, affective commitment, and perceived job performance in profit versus nonprofit organizations? Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 25, 147–164. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruscio, J., & Roche, B. (2012). Determining the number of factors to retain in an exploratory factor analysis using comparison data of known factorial structure. Psychological Assessment, 24, 282–292. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025697.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scanlan, J. N., & Still, M. (2013). Job satisfaction, burnout and turnover intention in occupational therapists working in mental health. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 60, 310–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12067.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E. (1997). Job satisfaction; Application, assessment, cause, and consequences. Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sverke, M., Hellgren, J., Naswall, K., Goransson, S., & Ohrming, J. (2008). Employee participation in organizational change: Investigating the effects of proactive vs. reactive implementation of downsizing in Swedish Hospitals. German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift für Personalforschung, 22, 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/239700220802200202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sverke, M., Låstad, L., Hellgren, J., Richter, A., & Näswall, K. (2019). A meta-analysis of job insecurity and employee performance: Testing temporal aspects, rating source, welfare Regime, and Union density as moderators. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142536.

  • Tietjen, M. A., & Myers, R. M. (1998). Motivation and job satisfaction. Management Decision, 36, 226–231. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251749810211027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberghe, C., Bentein, K., & Stinglhamber, F. (2004). Affective commitment to the organization, supervisor, and work group: Antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64, 47–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00029-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viswesvaran, C., Sanchez, J. I., & Fisher, J. (1999). The role of social support in the process of work stress: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54, 314–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Voet, J., Kuipers, B. S., & Groeneveld, S. (2016). Implementing change in public organizations: The relationship between leadership and affective commitment to change in a public sector context. Public Management Review, 18, 842–865. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1045020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., Law, K. S., Hackett, R. D., Wang, D., & Chen, Z. X. (2005). Leader-member exchange as a mediator of the relationship between transformational ladership and followers’ performance and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 420–432. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.17407908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wayne, S. J., Coyle-Shapiro, J., Eisenberger, R., Liden, R. C., Rousseau, D. M., & Shore, L. M. (2009). Social influences. In H. J. Klein, T. E. Becker & J. P. Meyer (Hrsg.), Commitment in organizations: Accumulated wisdom and new directions (S. 253–284). Routledge/Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiese, B. S. (2007). Work-life-balance. In K. Moser (Hrsg.), Wirtschaftspsychologie (S. 245–263). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. J., & Hazer, J. T. (1986). Antecedents and consequences of satisfaction and commitment in turnover models: A reanalysis using latent variable structural equation methods. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 219–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C., Ding, C. G., & Lo, K. W. (2016). Ethical leadership and multidimensional organizational citizenship behaviors. Group & Organization Management, 41, 343–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601115594973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zapf, D., & Semmer, N. K. (2004). Stress und Gesundheit in Organisationen. Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, 3, 1007–1112.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Zentrum für HochschulBildung, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Deutschland

    Julia Nogga

  2. Zentrum für HochschulBildung, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Deutschland

    Jens Rowold

Authors
  1. Julia Nogga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jens Rowold
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nogga, J., Rowold, J. (2022). Psychometrische Eigenschaften. In: Leadership 4.0 – Effektive Führung in der Arbeit 4.0. SpringerTests. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-65722-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-65722-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-65721-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-65722-5

  • eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation