Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Teamarbeit, Teamleistung und Teamentwicklung

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Personalpsychologie für das Human Resource Management

  • 11k Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Teamarbeit ist ein wichtiges Instrument zur Organisation von Arbeit, Wissensmanagement und Lernen in Organisationen. Teams bieten ihren Mitgliedern Zugehörigkeit, soziale Unterstützung, Lernfeld und Entwicklungschancen. Sie können sich schnell an veränderte Umweltbedingungen anpassen, übernehmen Führungsaufgaben und ermöglichen dadurch flachere Organisationshierarchien – all das ist für organisationale Agilität wichtig. Doch Teamarbeit ist per se noch kein Garant für Erfolg. Die Bedingungen für erfolgreiche Teamarbeit sind vielschichtig und liegen im Team-Design, in der Gestaltung unterstützender Kontextbedingungen und in einer effektiven Steuerung auf der Aufgaben- und Beziehungsebene. Diese Elemente werden im folgenden Kapitel nachgezeichnet. Die spezifischen Beiträge des HRM werden skizziert.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Antoni, C. H. (2003). Aufbau und Entwicklung selbstregulierender Arbeitsgruppen. In S. Stumpf & A. Thomas (Hrsg.), Teamarbeit und Teamentwicklung (S. 447–460). Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badke-Schaub, P., Hofinger, G., & Lauche, K. (2008). Human Factors. Psychologie sicheren Handelns in Risikobranchen. Springer Medizin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsade, S. G. (2002). The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4), 644–675. https://doi.org/10.2307/3094912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckhard, R. (1972). Optimizing team building efforts. Journal of Contemporary Business, 1(3), 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S. T. (2007). Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 595–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.595

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bezrukova, K., Spell, C., Caldwell, D., & Burger, J. (2016). A multilevel perspective on faultlines: Differentiating the effects between group- and organizational-level faultlines. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(1), 86–107. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boos, M. (2017). Führung und Zusammenarbeit in verteilten Teams. Hogrefe.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burks, S., Carpenter, J., & Goette, L. (2009). Performance pay and worker cooperation: Evidence from an artefactual field experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 70(3), 458–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, K. M., Mead, B. A., Stewart, G. L., Nielsen, J. D., & Solimeo, S. L. (2019). Reviewing work team design characteristics across industries: Combining meta-analysis and comprehensive synthesis. Small Group Research, 50(1), 138–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496418797431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coenen, M., & Kok, R. A. W. (2014). Workplace flexibility andnew product development performance: The role of telework and flexible work schedules. European Management Journal, 32, 564–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 741–749. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.741

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Delarue, A., Van Hootegem, G., Procter, S., & Burridge, M. (2008). Teamworking and organizational performance: A review of survey-based research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(2), 127–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dick, R., & West, M. A. (2013). Teamwork, Teamdiagnose und Teamentwicklung (2. Aufl.). Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behaviour in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emery, F., & Thorsrud, E. (1982). Industrielle Demokratie. Hans Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garbers, Y., & Konradt, U. (2013). The effect of financial incentives on performance: A quantitative review of individual and team-based financial incentives. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(1), 102–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gersick, C. J. G. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Towards a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31(1), 9–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginnett, R. C. (1993). Crews as groups: Their formation and their leadership. In E. L. Wiener, B. G. Kanki, & R. L. Helmreich (Hrsg.), Cockpit resource management (S. 71–98). Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasl, F. (2017). Selbsthilfe in Konflikten (8. Aufl.). Haupt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. Lorsch (Hrsg.), Handbook of organizational behavior. Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work redesign. Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R., & Wageman, R. (2005). A theory of team coaching. The Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 269–287. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffeld, S. (2001). Teamdiagnose. Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffeld, S., & Lehmann-Willenbrock, N. (2012). Meetings matter: Effects of team meetings on team and organizational success. Small Group Research, 43(2), 130–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496411429599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleingeld, A., van Mierlo, H., & Arends, L. (2011). The effect of goal setting on group performance: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(6), 1289–1304. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. (2009). Experiential learning theory: A dynamic, holistic approach to management. In S. J. Armstrong & C. V. Fukami (Hrsg.), The Sage handbook of management education, learning and development (S. 42–68). SAGE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • König, O., & Schattenhofer, C. (2012). Einführung in die Gruppendynamik. Carl Auer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konradt, U., Schippers, M. C., Garbers, Y., & Steenfatt, C. (2015). Effects of guided reflexivity and team feedback on team performance improvement: The role of team regulatory processes and cognitive emergent states. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(5), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kühl, S. (2001). Über das erfolgreiche Scheitern von Gruppenarbeitsprojekten. Rezentralisierung und Rehierarchisierung in Vorreiterunternehmen der Dezentralisierung. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 30(3), 199–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Meyer, B., Shemla, M., & Wegge, J. (2018). From being diverse to becoming diverse: A dynamic team diversity theory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39, 956–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, N., Zhao, H. H., Walter, S. L., Zhang, X. A., & Yu, J. (2015). Achieving more with less: Extra milers’ behavioral influences in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 1025–1039. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2006). New directions in goal setting theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 265–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu, J. E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kukenberger, M., Donsbach, J. S., & Alliger, G. M. (2015). Team role experience and orientation. Group & Organization Management, 40, 34–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (1983). Organizational demography. Research in Organizational Behavior, 5, 299–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redlich, A. (2019). Konfliktmoderation mit Gruppen (8. Aufl.). Windmühle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renkema, M., Bondarouk, T., & Bos-Nehles, A. (2018). Transformation to self-managing teams: Lessons learned: A look at current trends and data. Strategic HR Review, 17(2), 81–84. https://doi.org/10.1108/SHR-10-2017-0072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter, A. W., Dawson, J. F., & West, M. A. (2011). The effectiveness of teams in organizations: A meta-analysis. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(13), 2749–2769. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.573971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riedl, C., & Woolley, A. W. (2016). Teams vs. Crowds: A field test of the relative contribution of incentives, member ability, and emergent collaboration to crowd-based problem solving performance. Academy of Management Discoveries, 3(4), 382–403. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2384068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salas, E., DiazGranados, D., Klein, C., Burke, C. S., Stagl, K. C., Goodwin, G. F., & Halpin, S. M. (2008). Does team training improve team performance? A meta-analysis. Human Factors, 50(6), 903–933. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X375009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline. The art & practice of the learning organization. Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, P. (2003). Modelle der Gruppenentwicklung. In S. Stumpf & A. Thomas (Hrsg.), Teamarbeit und Teamentwicklung (S. 33–55). Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, G. L. (2006). A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design feature and team performance. Journal of Management, 32, 29–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305277792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher, S. M. B., & Patel, P. C. (2011). Demographic faultlines: A meta-analysis of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(6), 1119–1139. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 384–399.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, J., & Wong, W. K. P. (2008). Comparing traditional and virtual group forms: Identity, communication and trust in naturally occurring projectteams. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(1), 41–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190701763883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegge, J. (2013). Gruppenarbeit und Management von Teams. In H. Schuler & U. P. Kanning (Hrsg.), Lehrbuch der Personalpsychologie (3. Aufl., S. 933–978). Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werkmann-Karcher, B. (2010). Das HRM im Konfliktmanagement. In B. Werkmann-Karcher & J. Rietiker (Hrsg.), Angewandte Psychologie für das Human Resource Management (S. 375–393). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • West, M. A. (2012). Effective Teamwork. Practical Lessons from Organizational Research (3. Aufl.). BPS Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, S. A., & West, M. A. (2020). The psychology of work and organizations (3. Aufl.). Andover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zirkler, M., & Werkmann-Karcher, B. (2020). Psychologie der Agilität. Lernwege für Individuen und Teams. Springer Fachmedien. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-30357-0

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. IAP Institut für Angewandte Psychologie, ZHAW Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften, Zürich, Schweiz

    Birgit Werkmann-Karcher

Authors
  1. Birgit Werkmann-Karcher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Birgit Werkmann-Karcher .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. IAP Institut für Angewandte Psychologie, ZHAW Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften, Zürich, Schweiz

    Birgit Werkmann-Karcher

  2. IAP Institut für Angewandte Psychologie, ZHAW Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften, Zürich, Schweiz

    Andrea Müller

  3. Isolutions AG, Zürich, Schweiz

    Tatjana Zbinden

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Werkmann-Karcher, B. (2023). Teamarbeit, Teamleistung und Teamentwicklung. In: Werkmann-Karcher, B., Müller, A., Zbinden, T. (eds) Personalpsychologie für das Human Resource Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-65308-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-65308-1_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-65307-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-65308-1

  • eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation