Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Charisma, Sympathie und Attraktivität

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Erfolgsfaktor Socializing

  • 1502 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Wie Sie im Speziellen auch Ihr Charisma, Ihre Sympathie und Ihre Attraktivität für andere mitgestalten können, finden Sie in diesem Kapitel ausgeführt. Ihre charismatische Wirkung hat entscheidend damit zu tun, wie expressiv (beispielsweise mimisch ausdrucksstark) Sie agieren, wie gut Sie Ihre Gefühle im Griff haben bzw. diese authentisch vermitteln können sowie wie feinfühlig Sie auf andere eingehen. Um die eigene Attraktivität und Sympathiewirkung zu beeinflussen, können Sie Ähnlichkeiten mit Ihrem Gegenüber betonen, Vertrautheit etablieren, Assoziationen mit Positivem erzeugen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Auch wenn Politik eigentlich kein geeignetes Small-Talk-Thema ist, so ist dies hier eine gute Deeskalationsmethode, wenn sich jemand politisch echauffiert.

Literatur

  • Berscheid, E., Graziano, W., Monson, T., & Dermer, M. (1976). Outcome dependency: Attention, attribution, and attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 978–989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bierhoff, H. W., Buck, E., & Klein, R. (1989). Attractiveness and respectability of the offender as factors in the evaluation of criminal cases. In H. Wegener, F. Lösel, & J. Haisch (Hrsg.), Criminal behavior and the justice system (S. 193–207). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, R. F., Kale, A. R., & Cornell, K. R. (1990). Boredom as a limiting condition on the mere exposure effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 791–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castellow, W. A., Wuensch, K. L., & Moore, C. H. (1990). Effects of physical attractiveness of the plaintiff and defendant in sexual harassment judgements. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 547–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dion, K. K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. C., & Lyons, P. M. (1991). Natural observations of the link between attractiveness and initial legal judgements. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 541–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G., & Longo, L. C. (1991). What is beautiful is good, but …: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 109–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efran, M. G. & Patterson, E. W. J. (1976). The politics of appearance. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feingold, A. (1992). Good-looking people are not what we think. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 304–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57, 271–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garner, R. (2005). What’s in a name? Persuasion perhaps. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15, 108–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, A. A. (1969). Exposure and popularity. Journal of Personality, 37, 359–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hebl, M. R., & Mannix, L. M. (2003). The weight of obesity in evaluating others: A mere proximity effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 28–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulka, R. A., & Kessler, J. B. (1978). Is justice really blind? The influence of litigant physical attractiveness on juridical judgment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8, 366–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtzberg, R. L., Safar, H. & Cavior, N. (1968). Surgical and social rehabilitation of adult offenders. Proceedings of the 76th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 3, 649–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 390–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lott, A. J., & Lott, B. E. (1965). Group cohesiveness as interpersonal attraction: A review of relationships with antecedent and consequent variables. Psychological Bulletin, 64, 259–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mack, D., & Rainey, D. (1990). Female applicants’ grooming and personnel selection. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 399–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monin, B. (2003). The warm glow heuristic: When liking leads to familiarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1035–1048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montoya, R. M., Horton, R. S., Vevea, J. L., Citkowicz, M., & Lauber, E. A. (2017). A re-examination of the mere exposure effect: The influence of repeated exposure on recognition, familiarity, and liking. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 459–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreland, R. L., & Beach, S. R. (1992). Exposure effects in the classroom: The development of affinity among students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 255–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patzer, G. L. (1985). The physical attractiveness phenomena. Plenum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pulakos, E. D., & Wexley, K. N. (1983). The relationship among perceptual similarity, sex, and performance ratings in manager-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 129–139.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riggio, R. E. (1986). Assessment of basic social skills. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 649–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riggio, R. E. (2005). The Social Skills Inventory (SSI): Measuring nonverbal and social skills. The sourcebook of nonverbal measures: Going beyond words, 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, H., & Berger, W. (1979). Physische Attraktivität als Determinante für Beurteilung und Einstellungsempfehlung. Psychologie und Praxis, 23, 59–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears, G. J., & Rowe, P. M. (2003). A personality-based similar-to-me effect in the employment interview: Conscientiousness, affect-versus competence-mediated interpretations, and the role of job relevance. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 35, 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segal, M. W. (1974). Alphabet and attraction: An unobtrusive measure of the effect of propinquity in a field setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 654–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. R., & Mackie, D. M. (2000). Social psychology (2. Aufl.). Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, J. E., II. (1980). Defendant’s attractiveness as a factor in the outcome of trials. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10, 348–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, J. E., II. (1985). Appearance and punishment: The attraction-leniency effect in the courtroom. Journal of Social Psychology, 125, 373–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turban, D. B., & Jones, A. P. (1988). Supervisor-subordinate similarity: Types, effects, and mechanisms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 228–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wayne, S. J., & Liden, R. C. (1995). Effects of impression management on performance ratings: A longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 232–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werth L., Denzler M. & Mayer J. (2020). Soziale Wahrnehmung. In: Sozialpsychologie – Das Individuum im sozialen Kontext. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. B. (2001). Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 224–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. B., Crandall, R., Kail, R. V., & Swap, W. (1974). Effect of extreme exposure frequencies on different affective ratings of stimuli. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 38, 667–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. B., Shaver, P., Tavris, C., & Van Kreveld, D. (1972). Exposure, satiation, and stimulus discriminability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 270–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Zentrum für Training und Weiterbildung, Münster, Deutschland

    Lioba Werth

  2. Eibelstadt, Deutschland

    Christopher Thum

Authors
  1. Lioba Werth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christopher Thum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lioba Werth .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Werth, L., Thum, C. (2022). Charisma, Sympathie und Attraktivität. In: Erfolgsfaktor Socializing. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-64885-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-64885-8_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-64884-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-64885-8

  • eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation