Abstract
Several developments and findings in the life sciences demand that we think about genetics in a completely new, or at least different, way. We know better than ever that our environment and our genes are closer to each other than we have suspected. This is what epigenetics, which I highlight in Sect. 8.1, teaches us. It is without doubt one of the most exciting areas of genetics and offers, for those who need it, a molecular biological basis for our responsibility for future generations (Fig. 8.1).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Nelkin D, Lindee MS (2004) The DNA mystique: The gene as a cultural icon. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan/USA. doi:https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.6769
Tucci V, Isles AR, Kelsey G, et al (2019) Genomic Imprinting and Physiological Processes in Mammals. Cell 176: 952–965. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.043
Gustafsson Å (1979) Linnaeus’ Peloria: The history of a monster. Theor Appl Genet 54: 241–248. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00281206
Goethe JW (1820) Nacharbeiten und Sammlungen. In: Troll IW: Goethes Morphologische Schriften Jena
Cubas P, Vincent C, Coen E (1999) An epigenetic mutation responsible for natural variation in floral symmetry. Nature 401:157–161. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/43657
Bygren LO, Kaati G, Edvinsson S (2001) Longevity determined by paternal ancestors’ nutrition during their slow growth period. Acta Biotheor 49: 53–59
Kaati G, Bygren LO, Edvinsson S (2002) Cardiovascular and diabetes mortality determined by nutrition during parents’ and grandparents’ slow growth period. Eur J Hum Genet 10: 682–688. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200859
Ehrlich M, Wang R (1981) 5-Methylcytosine in eukaryotic DNA. Science 212: 1350–1357. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.6262918
Graham L (2016) Lysenko’s Ghost. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts/USA
Edith Heard RAM (2014) Transgenerational Epigenetic Inheritance: myths and mechanisms. Cell 157: 95–109. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.045
Nakamura T, Liu Y-J, Nakashima H, et al (2012) PGC7 binds histone H3K9me2 to protect against conversion of 5mC to 5hmC in early embryos. Nature 486: 415–419. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11093
Eaton SA, Jayasooriah N, Buckland ME, et al (2015) Roll over Weismann: extracellular vesicles in the transgenerational transmission of environmental effects. Epigenomics 7: 1165–1171. doi:https://doi.org/10.2217/epi.15.58
Chen Q, Yan W, Duan E (2016) Epigenetic inheritance of acquired traits through sperm RNAs and sperm RNA modifications. Nat Rev Genet 17: 733–743. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2016.106
Fernandes J, Arida RM, Gomez-Pinilla F (2017) Physical exercise as an epigenetic modulator of brain plasticity and cognition. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 80: 443–456. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.06.012
Ingerslev LR, Donkin I, Fabre O, et al (2018) Endurance training remodels sperm-borne small RNA expression and methylation at neurological gene hotspots. Clin Epigenet 10: 12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-018-0446-7
McGreevy KR, Tezanos P, Ferreiro-Villar I, et al (2019) Intergenerational transmission of the positive effects of physical exercise on brain and cognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 3: 201816781. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1816781116
Weaver ICG, Cervoni N, Champagne FA, et al (2004) Epigenetic programming by maternal behavior. Nat Neurosci 7: 847–854. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1276
Soffritti G, Busconi M, Sánchez R, et al (2016) Genetic and Epigenetic Approaches for the Possible Detection of Adulteration and Auto-Adulteration in Saffron (Crocus sativus L.) Spice. Molecules 21: 343. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21030343
Hong E, Lee SY, Jeong JY, et al (2017) Modern analytical methods for the detection of food fraud and adulteration by food category. J Sci Food Agric 97: 3877–3896. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.8364
Manikkam M, Guerrero-Bosagna C, Tracey R, et al (2012) Transgenerational Actions of Environmental Compounds on Reproductive Disease and Identification of Epigenetic Biomarkers of Ancestral Exposures. PLoS One 7: e31901. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031901
Schmidt F, Cherepkova MY, Platt RJ (2018) Transcriptional recording by CRISPR spacer acquisition from RNA. Nature 562: 380–385. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0569-1
Pulecio J, Verma N, Mejía-Ramírez E, et al (2017) CRISPR/Cas9-Based Engineering of the Epigenome. Cell Stem Cell 21: 431–447. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2017.09.006
Kelly AD, Issa J-PJ (2017) The promise of epigenetic therapy: reprogramming the cancer epigenome. Curr Opin Genet Dev 42: 68–77. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2017.03.015
Eraslan G, Avsec Ž, Gagneur J, Theis FJ (2019) Deep learning: new computational modelling techniques for genomics. Nat Rev Genet 278: 601. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-019-0122-6
Rudzio K (2018) Künstliche Intelligenz: Wenn der Roboter die Fragen stellt. Die Zeit 35:22
Gurovich Y, Hanani Y, Bar O, et al (2019) Identifying facial phenotypes of genetic disorders using deep learning. Nat Med 25: 60–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0279-0
Antonini G (1900) I precursori di C. Lombroso. Fratelli Bocca Editori, Torino/IT
Alipanahi B, Delong A, Weirauch MT, Frey BJ (2015) Predicting the sequence specificities of DNA- and RNA-binding proteins by deep learning. Nat Biotechnol 33: 831–838. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3300
Zhou J, Theesfeld CL, Yao K, et al (2018) Deep learning sequence-based ab initio prediction of variant effects on expression and disease risk. Nat Genet 50: 1171–1179. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-018-0160-6
Geib C (2019) A Chinese province is sequencing 1 million of its residents’ genomes. In: NeoScope. Visited 14.04.2019: futurism.com/chinese-province-sequencing-1-million-residents-genomes
Bycroft C, Freeman C, Petkova D, et al (2018) The UK Biobank resource with deep phenotyping and genomic data. Nature 562: 203–209. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0579-z
Sirugo G, Williams SM, Tishkoff SA (2019) The Missing Diversity in Human Genetic Studies. Cell 177: 26–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.02.048
Mirsky Y, Mahler T, Shelef I, Elovici Y (2019) CT-GAN: Malicious Tampering of 3D Medical Imagery using Deep Learning. arxiv.org/abs/1901.03597
Valles-Colomer M, Falony G, Darzi Y, et al (2019) The neuroactive potential of the human gut microbiota in quality of life and depression. Nat Microbiol 13: 1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-018-0337-x
Abraham C (2002) Gene pioneer urges dream of human perfection. In: The Globe and Mail. Visited 18.04.2019: theglobeandmail.com/technology/gene-pioneer-urges-dream-of-human-perfection/article22734105/
Weber-Lehmann J, Schilling E, Gradl G, et al (2014) Finding the needle in the haystack: Differentiating “identical” twins in paternity testing and forensics by ultra-deep next generation sequencing. Forensic Sci Int: Genet 9: 42–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2013.10.015
Fontdevila A (2011) The Dynamic Genome. Oxford University Press, Oxford/UK
Carretero-Paulet L, Librado P, Chang T-H, et al (2015) High Gene Family Turnover Rates and Gene Space Adaptation in the Compact Genome of the Carnivorous Plant Utricularia gibba. Mol Biol Evol 32: 1284–1295. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msv020
Bodea GO, McKelvey EGZ, Faulkner GJ (2018) Retrotransposon-induced mosaicism in the neural genome. Open Biol 8: 180074. doi:https://doi.org/10.1098/rsob.180074
Locke DP, Hillier LW, Warren WC, et al (2011) Comparative and demographic analysis of orang-utan genomes. Nature 469: 529–533. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09687
Dunning LT, Olofsson JK, Parisod C, et al (2019) Lateral transfers of large DNA fragments spread functional genes among grasses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116: 4416–4425. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1810031116
Byrne K, Nichols RA (1999) Culex pipiens in London Underground tunnels: differentiation between surface and subterranean populations. Heredity 82: 7–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6884120
Neafsey DE, Waterhouse RM, Abai MR, et al (2015) Highly evolvable malaria vectors: The genomes of 16 Anopheles mosquitoes. Science 347: 1258522. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258522
Further Reading
Kammerer P (1913) Sind wir Sklaven der Vergangenheit oder Werkmeister der Zukunft? Anzengruber-Verlag Brüder Suschitzky, Wien, Leipzig.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wünschiers, R. (2022). Rethinking Genetics. In: Genes, Genomes and Society. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-64081-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-64081-4_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-64080-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-64081-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)