Skip to main content

Matter Couplings in Global Supersymmetry

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Supergravity

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Physics ((LNP,volume 991))

  • 1093 Accesses

Abstract

In the previous chapter, we discussed \(\mathcal {N}=1\) pure supergravity, which only involves the \(\mathcal {N}=1\) supergravity multiplet. In order to include also ordinary matter fields and Yang–Mills-type gauge interactions, one has to couple the pure supergravity sector to \(\mathcal {N}=1\) chiral and vector multiplets in a way consistent with local supersymmetry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In terms of superfields, Φ n, this corresponds to \(\int d^4\theta \,\, \delta _{mn}\varPhi ^m(\varPhi ^{n})^\dagger +\left ( \int d^2 \theta \,\, W(\varPhi ) +\mbox{h.c.}\right )\) after integrating out auxiliary fields.

  2. 2.

    In the following we will often denote the Kronecker symbol as \(\delta _{m \bar {n}}\) to make manifest covariance of the equations, even though one should interpret it as δ mn.

  3. 3.

    More precisely, one defines the holonomy group, Hol(p), at a point \(p\in \mathcal {M}_{\mathrm {scalar}}\) to be the group generated by all M j i(γ) of curves that begin and end at p. This pointwise holonomy group is the same for all points on \(\mathcal {M}_{\mathrm {scalar}}\) if (as we will always assume) \(\mathcal {M}_{\mathrm {scalar}}\) is connected, so that one can elevate it to the holonomy group, \(\mbox{Hol}(\mathcal {M}_{\mathrm {scalar}})\), of the entire manifold.

  4. 4.

    More properly speaking, they are sections in the tangent bundle of \(\mathcal {M}_{\mathrm {scalar}}\) and sections in the spacetime spinor bundle.

  5. 5.

    The intersection of \(GL(n_{C},\mathbb {C})\) and SO(n C) inside \(GL(2n_C,\mathbb {R})\) depends on how SO(2n C) is embedded inside \(GL(2n_{C},\mathbb {R})\) relative to the embedding (5.29) of \(GL(n_{C},\mathbb {C})\). The intersection is maximal if the metric to be preserved by SO(2n C) in the basis (Re(δϕ n), Im(δϕ m)) is the unit matrix \(\mathbb {1}_{2n_{C}}\). In that case, the orthogonality condition reads \( M'{ }^{T}M'=\mathbb {1}_{2n_{C}}\), which is equivalent to \(A^\dagger A=\mathbb {1}_{n_{C}}\), which means that in that case the intersection of \(GL(n_C,\mathbb {C})\) and SO(2n C) sweeps out the full U(n C).

  6. 6.

    Kähler manifolds can in fact equivalently be defined as manifolds that are complex and real symplectic at the same time.

  7. 7.

    We remind the reader that this is still a toy model where we are neglecting any chirality properties of the fermions. The complete model will be discussed below.

  8. 8.

    In classical mechanics, if the moment maps Poisson commute with the Hamiltonian, they are conserved along the time evolution generated by the Hamiltonian.

  9. 9.

    Similar to the F-terms, the above D-terms are on-shell expressions for a certain auxiliary field, often called D(x), of an off-shell vector supermultiplet.

  10. 10.

    In certain theories with non-gauge invariant gauge kinetic functions, generalized Chern–Simons terms may also occur, which are terms of the form A I ∧ A J ∧ dA K and A I ∧ A J ∧ A K ∧ A L [5].

References

  1. J. Bagger, E. Witten, The gauge invariant supersymmetric nonlinear sigma model. Phys. Lett. B 118, 103–106 (1982)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. H. Goldstein, Classical Mechanics, 2nd edn. (Addison-Wesley, Boston, 1980). ISBN 978-0-201-02918-5

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. R. Kallosh, L. Kofman, A.D. Linde, A. Van Proeyen, Superconformal symmetry, supergravity and cosmology. Class. Quant. Grav. 17, 4269–4338 (2000) [arXiv:hep-th/0006179 [hep-th]]

    Google Scholar 

  4. C.M. Hull, A. Karlhede, U. Lindstrom, M. Rocek, Nonlinear σ models and their gauging in and out of superspace. Nucl. Phys. B 266, 1–44 (1986)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. J. De Rydt, J. Rosseel, T.T. Schmidt, A. Van Proeyen, M. Zagermann, Symplectic structure of N = 1 supergravity with anomalies and Chern-Simons terms. Class. Quant. Grav. 24, 5201–5220 (2007). 0705.4216

    ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. S. Ferrara, L. Girardello, F. Palumbo, A general mass formula in broken supersymmetry. Phys. Rev. D20, 403 (1979)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. S. Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields, vol. 3. Supersymmetry (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000), 419 p.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dall’Agata, G., Zagermann, M. (2021). Matter Couplings in Global Supersymmetry. In: Supergravity. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 991. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-63980-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-63980-1_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-63978-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-63980-1

  • eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics