Skip to main content

Measuring Asset Composability as a Proxy for DeFi Integration

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Financial Cryptography and Data Security. FC 2021 International Workshops (FC 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 12676))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Decentralized financial (DeFi) applications on the Ethereum blockchain are highly interoperable because they share a single state in a deterministic computational environment. Stakeholders can deposit claims on assets, referred to as ‘liquidity shares’, across applications producing effects equivalent to rehypothecation in traditional financial systems. We seek to understand the degree to which this practice may contribute to financial integration on Ethereum by examining transactions in ‘composed’ derivatives for the assets DAI, USDC, USDT, ETH and tokenized BTC for the full set of 344.8 million Ethereum transactions computed in 2020. We identify a salient trend for ‘composing’ assets in multiple sequential generations of derivatives and comment on potential systemic implications for the Ethereum network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    defipulse.com, as of 31st Jan 2020.

  2. 2.

    Bitcoin (BTC) is a non-native asset on Ethereum, represented by ‘wrapped bitcoin’ locked on the original blockchain. We compile the three largest representations of Bitcoin on Ethereum into a single category, assigning the category an initial distance of one.

References

  1. Antonopoulos, A., Wood, G.: Mastering Ethereum: Building Smart Contracts and DApps. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bartoletti, M., Chiang, J.H., Lluch-Lafuente, A.: SoK: Lending Pools in Decentralized Finance (2020). http://arxiv.org/abs/2012.13230

  3. Kao, H.-T., Chitra, T., Chiang, R., Morrow Gauntlet, J.: An Analysis of the Market Risk to Participants in the Compound Protocol (2019). https://scfab.github.io/2020/FAB2020_p5.pdf

  4. Angeris, G., Kao, H.-T., Chiang, R., Noyes, C., Chitra, T.: An Analysis of Uniswap Markets (2019). http://arxiv.org/abs/1911.03380

  5. Angeris, G., Chitra, T.: Improved Price Oracles: Constant Function Market Makers (2020). https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.10001

  6. Werner, S.M., Perez, D., Gudgeon, L., Klages-Mundt, A., Harz, D., Knottenbelt, W.J.: SoK: Decentralized Finance (DeFi) (2021). https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.08778

  7. Evans, A.: Liquidity Provider Returns in Geometric Mean Markets (2020). https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.08806

  8. Jensen, J.R., Pourpouneh, M., Nielsen, K., Ross, O.: The Homogeneous Properties of Automated Market Makers (2021). https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=3807820

  9. Angeris, G., Evans, A., Chitra, T.: When does the tail wag the dog? Curvature and market making (2020). https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.08040

  10. von Wachter, V., Jensen, J.R., Ross, O.: How Decentralized is the Governance of Blockchain-based Finance? Empirical Evidence from four Governance Token Distributions (2020). https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.10096

  11. Castiglionesi, F., Feriozzi, F., Lorenzoni, G.: Financial integration and liquidity crises. Manag. Sci. 65(3), 955–975 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Somin, S., Altshuler, Y., Gordon, G., ‘Sandy’ Pentland, A., Shmueli, E.: Network dynamics of a financial ecosystem. Sci. Rep. 10(1), 1–10 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61346-y

  13. Nadler, M., Schär, F.: Decentralized Finance, Centralized Ownership? An Iterative Mapping Process to Measure Protocol Token Distribution (2020). http://arxiv.org/abs/2012.09306

  14. Tolmach, P., Li, Y., Lin, S.-W., Liu, Y.: Formal Analysis of Composable DeFi Protocols (2021). https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.00540

  15. Wright, T.: (2020). https://cointelegraph.com/news/akropolis-defi-protocol-paused-as-hackers-get-away-with-2m-in-dai. Accessed 20 Dec 2020

  16. Turley, C.: (2020). https://defirate.com/imbtc-uniswap-hack/. Accessed 20 Dec 2020

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Victor von Wachter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 International Financial Cryptography Association

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

von Wachter, V., Jensen, J.R., Ross, O. (2021). Measuring Asset Composability as a Proxy for DeFi Integration. In: Bernhard, M., et al. Financial Cryptography and Data Security. FC 2021 International Workshops. FC 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12676. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-63958-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-63958-0_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-63957-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-63958-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics