Skip to main content

Cervical Disc Prosthesis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Minimally Invasive Spine Intervention
  • 338 Accesses

Abstract

After World War II, the operation of a herniated disc of the cervical spine gradually developed into a routine procedure. In addition to a dorsal surgical approach, the ventral approach predominated, with fusion of the motion segments without or with disc replacement as a placeholder made of a wide variety of materials. In the lower segments of the cervical spine, the extent of physiological movements is less than in the upper half, but the lower half is more frequently affected by degenerative changes and free disc herniations. Fusion of a single motion segment leaves a restriction of mobility that is hardly noticeable to the patient. However, there is increasing evidence that, as a result of fusion over a period of months or years, mechanical overloading of the adjacent segments can lead to premature degeneration. Experimental pressure measurements in the adjacent intervertebral spaces after fusion have shown significantly increased values. However, the clinical sequelae are often only noticed after years or decades. To avoid the loss of mobility of a motion segment through disc surgery, disc prostheses were therefore developed, each of which was intended to maintain physiological mobility. Since about 2000, many models of cervical disc prostheses are now commercially available. Our own experiences within the framework of a prospective surgical study are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aghayev E, Bärlocher C, Sgier F, Hasdemir M, Steinsiepe KF, Wernli F, Porchert F, Hausmann O, Ramadan A, Maestretti G, Ebeling U (2013) Five-year results of cervical disc prostheses in the SWISSspine registry. Eur Spine J 22(8):1723–1730

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham BW, Gordon JD, Dmitriev AE, Hu N, McAfee PC (2003) Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Spine 28(20S):S110–S117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ding C, Hong Y, Liu H, Shi R, Hu T, Li T (2012) Intermediate clinical outcome of Bryan cervical disc replacement for degenerative disk disease and its effect on adjacent segment disks. Orthopedics 35(6):e909–e916

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Lim TH, Jeong ST, Kim JG, Hodges SD, An HS (2002) Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion. Spine 27(22):2431–2434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Firsching R, Jöllenbeck B, Hahne R (2005) Bandscheibenprothesen für die Halswirbelsäule. Ärzteblatt Sachsen-Anhalt 16:48–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffin J, Casey A, Kehr P, Liebig K et al (2002) Preliminary clinical experience with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis. Neurosurgery 51(3):840–847

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goffin J, Geusens E, Vantomme N, Quintens E, Waerzeggers Y, Depreitere B, van Calenbergh F, van Loon J (2004) Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 17(2):79–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goffin J, Van Calenbergh F, van Loon J et al (2003) Intermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis: single-level and bi-level. Spine 28(24):2673–2678

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hahne R (2006) Prospektive klinische Verlaufsbeobachtung von 100 Patienten nach Implantation einer zervikalen Bandscheibenprothese (BRYANTM cervical disc system). Dissertationsschrift Medizinische Fakultät der Universität Magdeburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Quan GM, Vital J-M, Hansen S, Pointillart V (2011) Eight-year clinical and radiological follow-up of the Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty. Spine 36(8):639–646

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Zhu W, Zhu L, Du Y (2014) Midterm outcomes of total cervical total disc replacement with Bryan prosthesis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 24(1):275–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman L (2017) Langzeitergebnisse nach zervikaler Bandscheibenersatzoperation bei Verwendung der Bryan-Prothese. Inaugural-Dissertation Medizinische Fakultät der Universität Magdeburg

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Firsching .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Firsching, R. (2023). Cervical Disc Prosthesis. In: Jerosch, J. (eds) Minimally Invasive Spine Intervention. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-63814-9_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-63814-9_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-63813-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-63814-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics