Abstract
After World War II, the operation of a herniated disc of the cervical spine gradually developed into a routine procedure. In addition to a dorsal surgical approach, the ventral approach predominated, with fusion of the motion segments without or with disc replacement as a placeholder made of a wide variety of materials. In the lower segments of the cervical spine, the extent of physiological movements is less than in the upper half, but the lower half is more frequently affected by degenerative changes and free disc herniations. Fusion of a single motion segment leaves a restriction of mobility that is hardly noticeable to the patient. However, there is increasing evidence that, as a result of fusion over a period of months or years, mechanical overloading of the adjacent segments can lead to premature degeneration. Experimental pressure measurements in the adjacent intervertebral spaces after fusion have shown significantly increased values. However, the clinical sequelae are often only noticed after years or decades. To avoid the loss of mobility of a motion segment through disc surgery, disc prostheses were therefore developed, each of which was intended to maintain physiological mobility. Since about 2000, many models of cervical disc prostheses are now commercially available. Our own experiences within the framework of a prospective surgical study are presented.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aghayev E, Bärlocher C, Sgier F, Hasdemir M, Steinsiepe KF, Wernli F, Porchert F, Hausmann O, Ramadan A, Maestretti G, Ebeling U (2013) Five-year results of cervical disc prostheses in the SWISSspine registry. Eur Spine J 22(8):1723–1730
Cunningham BW, Gordon JD, Dmitriev AE, Hu N, McAfee PC (2003) Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Spine 28(20S):S110–S117
Ding C, Hong Y, Liu H, Shi R, Hu T, Li T (2012) Intermediate clinical outcome of Bryan cervical disc replacement for degenerative disk disease and its effect on adjacent segment disks. Orthopedics 35(6):e909–e916
Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Lim TH, Jeong ST, Kim JG, Hodges SD, An HS (2002) Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion. Spine 27(22):2431–2434
Firsching R, Jöllenbeck B, Hahne R (2005) Bandscheibenprothesen für die Halswirbelsäule. Ärzteblatt Sachsen-Anhalt 16:48–51
Goffin J, Casey A, Kehr P, Liebig K et al (2002) Preliminary clinical experience with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis. Neurosurgery 51(3):840–847
Goffin J, Geusens E, Vantomme N, Quintens E, Waerzeggers Y, Depreitere B, van Calenbergh F, van Loon J (2004) Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 17(2):79–85
Goffin J, Van Calenbergh F, van Loon J et al (2003) Intermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis: single-level and bi-level. Spine 28(24):2673–2678
Hahne R (2006) Prospektive klinische Verlaufsbeobachtung von 100 Patienten nach Implantation einer zervikalen Bandscheibenprothese (BRYANTM cervical disc system). Dissertationsschrift Medizinische Fakultät der Universität Magdeburg
Quan GM, Vital J-M, Hansen S, Pointillart V (2011) Eight-year clinical and radiological follow-up of the Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty. Spine 36(8):639–646
Zhang Z, Zhu W, Zhu L, Du Y (2014) Midterm outcomes of total cervical total disc replacement with Bryan prosthesis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 24(1):275–281
Zimmerman L (2017) Langzeitergebnisse nach zervikaler Bandscheibenersatzoperation bei Verwendung der Bryan-Prothese. Inaugural-Dissertation Medizinische Fakultät der Universität Magdeburg
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Firsching, R. (2023). Cervical Disc Prosthesis. In: Jerosch, J. (eds) Minimally Invasive Spine Intervention. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-63814-9_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-63814-9_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-63813-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-63814-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)