Abstract
Open spondylodesis is one of the largest spinal surgeries and is associated with extensive access trauma. There is sometimes considerable blood loss and not infrequently wound healing problems. In this operation, the use of minimally invasive procedures can therefore reduce the access trauma particularly significantly. Spondylodesis aims to achieve a stable connection of vertebrae for life. This goal is typically achieved with a dorsal transpedicular screw-rod system and the apposition of bone in the disc space or at the facet joints. Only bony fusion of the involved vertebrae can ensure permanent stability, as screw-rod systems alone usually cannot permanently withstand the high load. After about 4–5 years, fatigue fractures of the systems or material loosening occur. Until the end of the 1990s, open dorsoventral, usually two-stage surgery with insertion of an iliac crest span for ventral support was the method of choice for spondylodesis. A reduction in surgical and access trauma was achieved by introducing cages for ventral support. These are filled with local bone from the dorsal spine access area for fusion, eliminating the need for iliac crest removal and the additional trauma of the ventral approach.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Cole JS IV, Jackson TR (2007) Minimally invasive lumbar discectomy in obese patients. Neurosurgery 61(3):539–544. discussion 544
Deininger MH, Unfried MI, Vougioukas VI, Hubbe U (2009) Minimally invasive dorsal percutaneous spondylodesis for the treatment of adult pyogenic spondylodiscitis. Acta Neurochir 151(11):1451–1457
Desai A, Bekelis K, Ball PA, Lurie J, Mirza SK, Tosteson TD et al (2013) Variation in outcomes across centers after surgery for lumbar stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis in the spine patient outcomes research trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(8):678–691
Foley KT, Gupta SK (2002) Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation of the lumbar spine: preliminary clinical results. J Neurosurg 97(1 Suppl):7–12
Foley KT, Holly LT, Schwender JD (2003) Minimally invasive lumbar fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28(15 Suppl):S26–S35
Franke J, Greiner-Perth R, Boehm H, Mahlfeld K, Grasshoff H, Allam Y et al (2009) Comparison of a minimally invasive procedure versus standard microscopic discotomy: a prospective randomised controlled clinical trial. Eur Spine J 18(7):992–1000
Galbusera F, Volkheimer D, Reitmaier S, Berger-Roscher N, Kienle A, Wilke H-J (2015) Pedicle screw loosening: a clinically relevant complication? Eur Spine J 24(5):1005–1016
Harms J, Rolinger H (1982) A one-stager procedure in operative treatment of spondylolistheses: dorsal traction-reposition and anterior fusion (author’s transl). Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 120(3):343–347
Holly LT, Schwender JD, Rouben DP, Foley KT (2006) Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: indications, technique, and complications. Neurosurg Focus 20(3):E6
Karikari IO, Isaacs RE (2010) Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion a review of techniques and outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(26S):294–301
Khan NR, Clark AJ, Lee SL, Venable GT, Rossi NB, Foley KT (2015) Surgical outcomes for minimally invasive vs open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurgery 77(6):847–874
Kim CW, Siemionow K, Anderson DG, Phillips FM (2011) The current state of minimally invasive spine surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(6):582–596
Klingler JH, Volz F, Krüger MT, Kogias E, Rölz R, Scholz C, Sircar R, Hubbe U (2015) Accidental durotomy in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: frequency, risk factors, and management. ScientificWorldJournal 2015:532628
Li F, Huo H, Yang X, Xiao Y, Xing W, Xia H (2014) Comment on Tian et al.: minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis based on the current evidence. Eur Spine J 23(4):927–928
McAfee PC, Regan JJ, Geis WP, Fedder IL (1998) Minimally invasive anterior retroperitoneal approach to the lumbar spine. Emphasis on the lateral BAK. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23(13):1476–1484
Park P, Foley KT (2008) Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with reduction of spondylolisthesis: technique and outcomes after a minimum of 2 years’ follow-up. Neurosurg Focus 25(2):E16
Pereira P, Buzek D, Franke J, Senker W, Kosmala A, Hubbe U et al (2015) Surgical data and early postoperative outcomes after minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion: results of a prospective, multicenter, observational data-monitored study. PLoS One 10(3):e0122312
Schwender JD, Holly LT, Rouben DP, Foley KT (2005) Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): technical feasibility and initial results. J Spinal Disord Tech 18(Suppl):S1–S6
Tian N-F, Mao F-M (2014) Answer to the letter to the editor of Feng Li et al. entitled “minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis based on the current evidence” by Tian N-F et al. Eur Spine J 23(4):929–930
Tian N-F, Wu Y-S, Zhang X-L, Xu H-Z, Chi Y-L, Mao F-M (2013) Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis based on the current evidence. Eur Spine J 22(8):1741–1749
Wiesner L, Kothe R, Ruther W (1999) Anatomic evaluation of two different techniques for the percutaneous insertion of pedicle screws in the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24(15):1599–1603
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hubbe, U. (2023). Minimally Invasive Spondylodesis Via Percutaneous Approach with Tubular Retractors. In: Jerosch, J. (eds) Minimally Invasive Spine Intervention. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-63814-9_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-63814-9_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-63813-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-63814-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)