Abstract
The Defendant, Zhongshan Bank, guaranteed CIEC Shandong Company’s liability to pay for two vessels. CIEC Shandong breached its obligation to pay the Plaintiff for the two vessels. The Defendant refused to pay the Plaintiff, because the name of the beneficiary as stated in the guarantee contract differed from the Plaintiff’s name as stated in other documents relating to the sale. The Plaintiff sued the Defendant to enforce the guarantee. The court held that because the Defendant had actual knowledge that the Plaintiff’s name as stated in the guarantee contract was, despite the lack of conformity, referring to the same company as in the other documents, the Defendant was at fault in refusing to pay the Plaintiff and was liable for the amount claimed plus interest.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Davies, M., Lin, J. (2021). Foreign Economic and Technical Cooperation Co., Ltd. of China Changjiang National Shipping Group et al. v. China Construction Bank Co., Ltd. Qingdao Zhongshan Road Sub-branch. In: Davies, M., Lin, J. (eds) Chinese Maritime Cases. Chinese Maritime Cases Series. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-63810-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-63810-1_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-63809-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-63810-1
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)