Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mythen zum Schwangerschaftsabbruch

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Schwangerschaftsabbruch und gestörte Frühschwangerschaft

  • 2120 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Es existieren zahlreiche Mythen zum Schwangerschaftsabbruch, die Betroffene verunsichern können. Eine starke Tabuisierung des Themas führt dazu, dass weder ungewollt Schwangere noch die durchführenden Ärztinnen darüber reden. Dadurch können sich Mythen halten und verfestigen. In diesem Kapitel werden einige der Mythen benannt und widerlegt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. AMRC (2011) Induced abortion and mental health: a systematic review of the mental health outcomes of induced abortion, including their prevalence and associated factors. National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. APA Task Force on Mental Health and Abortion (2008) Report of the apa task force on mental health and abortion. American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rocca CH, Samari G,Foster DG, Gould H, Kimport K (2020) Emotions and decision rightness over five years following an abortion: an examination of decision difficulty and abortion stigma. Soc Sci & Med. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed. 2019.112704. (13. Januar 2020)

  4. More on Koop's study of abortion. Fam Plann Perspect 22(1):36–39. PMID: 2323405. (1990 Jan-Feb). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2323405/

  5. RCOG Fetal Awareness: Review of research and recommendations for practice published: 25/06/2010. Zugegriffen: 9. Mai 21

    Google Scholar 

  6. Statistisches Bundesamt. https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Gesundheit/Schwangerschaftsabbrueche/. Zugegriffen: 11. März 2021

  7. Comendant R, Hodorogea S, Sagaidac I (2014) Complications and safety. In: Rowlands S (Hrsg) Abortion care. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  8. Voigt M, Henrich W, Zygmunt M, Friese K, Straube S, Briese V (2009) Is induced abortion a risk factor in subsequent pregnancy? J Perinat Med 37:144–149. Copyright by Walter de Gruyter, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1515/JPM.2009.001

  9. Oliver-Williams C, Fleming M, Monteath K, Wood AM, Smith GCS (2013) Changes in association between previous therapeutic abortion and preterm birth in Scotland, 1980 to 2008: a historical cohort study. PLoS Med 10(7):e1001481. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001481

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Gerdts C, Dobkin L, Greene Foster D, Bimla Schwar E (2016) Side effects, physical health consequences, and mortality associated with abortion and birth after an unwanted pregnancy. Womens Health Issues 26(1):55–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2015.10.001. Epub 2015 Nov 11.c. (Jan-Feb 2016)

  11. Holmlund S, Kauko T, Matomäki J et al (2016) Induced abortion - impact on a subsequent pregnancy in first-time mothers: a registry-based study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 16:325. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1109-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Beral V et al (2004) Breast cancer and abortion: collaborative reanalysis of data from 53 epidemiological studies, including 83.000 women with breast cancer from 16 countries. Lancet 363:1007–1016

    Google Scholar 

  13. Prof. Dr. med.Alexander Scharf; Praxis für Pränatalmedizin, Darmstadt; Vortrag: FOKO, Düsseldorf 2019

    Google Scholar 

  14. Trussell J (2011) Contraceptive efficacy. In: Hatcher RA, Trussell J, Nelson AL, Cates W, Kowal D, Policar M (Hrsg) Contraceptive technology: twentieth revised edition. Ardent Media, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Furedi A (2016) The moral case of abortion. ISBN-13: 978-1137411181

    Google Scholar 

  16. Belfield T (2014) Myths and misinformation. In: Rowlands S (Hrsg) Abortion Care. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Berlin, Deutschland

    Jana Maeffert & Christiane Tennhardt

Authors
  1. Jana Maeffert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christiane Tennhardt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jana Maeffert .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert durch Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Maeffert, J., Tennhardt, C. (2021). Mythen zum Schwangerschaftsabbruch. In: Schwangerschaftsabbruch und gestörte Frühschwangerschaft. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-63517-9_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-63517-9_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-63516-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-63517-9

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation