Abstract
The Plaintiff, a finance leasing company, sued the First Defendant, the lessee, to recover outstanding charter hire under a finance leasing contract. The Plaintiff also claimed that the Second Defendant, a port administration, was liable to pay part of the outstanding amount under a guarantee contract. The First Defendant counterclaimed against the Plaintiff, arguing that the two ships that were the subject of the finance leasing contract were defective because they were built at the wrong shipyard The court held that the First Defendant was liable to pay the outstanding hire. Although the Second Defendant, as a public institution performing administrative functions was not legally permitted to engage in business activities such as providing a guarantee, it was nevertheless ordered to pay half of the outstanding amount if the First Defendant did not do so.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Davies, M., Lin, J. (2021). Chongqing Transportation Equipment Finance Leasing Co., Ltd. v. Chongqing Kunyuan Shipping Co., Ltd. et al.. In: Davies, M., Lin, J. (eds) Chinese Maritime Cases. Chinese Maritime Cases Series. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-63239-0_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-63239-0_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-63238-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-63239-0
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)