Abstract
The Plaintiff insurance company sought to recover monetary damages for loss of goods, when iron ore purchased by the Plaintiff’s client and loaded unto the Defendant carrier’s ship in Brazil was alleged to be lacking in weight upon delivery in Shanghai. The Defendant argued that the difference in weight, as measured in wet metric tons, was due to the quality of the iron ore, which naturally drained off water weight during the voyage to Shanghai. This drained water had to be removed from the hold at sea to maintain the safety of the ship. The court found that the Plaintiff did not provide sufficient evidence to refute this argument, either through documentation or by using an alternative method of weighing the delivered ore in dry metric tons. The Plaintiff’s claim that goods were lost was not supported and judgment was rendered for the Defendant.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Davies, M., Lin, J. (2021). China Pacific Insurance Co., Ltd. Shipping Insurance Operation Center v. Teh May Maritime Corporate Limited. In: Davies, M., Lin, J. (eds) Chinese Maritime Cases. Chinese Maritime Cases Series. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-63239-0_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-63239-0_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-63238-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-63239-0
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)