Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Intelligenz und schulische Leistungen

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Entwicklungspsychologie im Kindes- und Jugendalter

  • 54k Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Bevor wir uns den Forschungsarbeiten zur Entwicklung der Intelligenz zuwenden, geht es zunächst darum zu klären, was Intelligenz ist. In den meisten Bereichen der kognitiven Entwicklung wie Wahrnehmung, Sprache und Begriffsverstehen werden altersbezogene Veränderungen geprüft. Aber die Intelligenzforschung interessiert sich auch für individuelle Unterschiede zwischen Kindern gleichen Alters. Fragen zur Intelligenzentwicklung werden aus gutem Grund kontrovers diskutiert, da sie sehr grundlegende Aspekte betreffen: die Rolle von Vererbung und Umwelt, den Einfluss ethnischer Unterschiede, die Effekte von Reichtum und Armut und die Möglichkeit zu Fortschritten. Daneben werden neuere Intelligenztheorien vorgestellt, die einen größeren Bereich menschlicher Fähigkeiten umfassen. Zu den wichtigsten Intelligenzleistungen von Kindern gehört der Erwerb schulischer Fähigkeiten wie Lesen, Schreiben und Mathematik.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Alexander, K. L., Entwisle, D. R., & Olson, L. S. (2007). Lasting consequences of the summer learning gap. American Sociological Review, 72, 167–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alibali, M. W., Spencer, R. C., Knox, L., & Kita, S. (2011). Spontaneous gestures influence strategy choices in problem solving. Psychological Science, 22, 1138–1144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417722.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. C., Wilson, P. T., & Fielding, L. G. (1988). Growth in reading and how children spend their time outside of school. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 285–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apthorp, H., Randel, B., Cherasaro, T., Clark, T., McKeown, M., & Beck, I. (2012). Effects of a supplemental vocabulary program on word knowledge and passage comprehension. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 5(2), 160–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2012.660240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashcraft, M. H., & Ridley, K. S. (2005). Math anxiety and its cognitive consequences. In J. I. D. Campbell (Hrsg.), Handbook of mathematical cognition (S. 315–327). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, D. H., Zhou, X., Zhang, Y., Cui, J., Fuchs, L. S., Jordan, N. C., … Siegler, R. S. (2015). Development of fraction concepts and procedures in U.S. and Chinese children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 129, 68–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2014.08.006.

  • Bailey, D. H., Nguyen, T., Jenkins, J. M., Domina, T., Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. S. (2016). Fadeout in an early mathematics intervention: Constraining content of preexisting differences? Developmental Psychology, 52(9), 1457–1469. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000188.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Beilock, S. L., & Willingham, D. T. (2014, Summer). Math anxiety: Can teachers help students reduce it? American Educator. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1043398.pdf. Zugegriffen am 05.10.2020.

  • Beilock, S. L., Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., & Levine, S. C. (2010). Female teachers’ math anxiety affects girls’ math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 1860–1863.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, T., Schaeffer, M. W., Maloney, E. A., Peterson, L., Gregor, C., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2015). Math at home adds up to achievement in school. Science, 350(6257), 196–198. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac7427.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V. W., & Richards, T. L. (2002). Building a writing brain neurologically. In V. W. Berninger & T. L. Richards (Hrsg.), Brain literacy for educators and psychologists (S. 247–271). San Diego: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bertelletti, I., Lucangeli, D., Piazza, M., Dehaene, S., & Zorzi, M. (2010). Numerical estimation in preschoolers. Developmental Psychology, 46, 545–551. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bialystok, E. (2000). Symbolic representation across domains in preschool children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 76, 173–189.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blumberg, F. C., & Randall, J. D. (2013). What do children and adolescents say they do during video game play? Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 34(2), 82–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2012.11.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumberg, F. C., Deater-Deckard, K., Calvert, S. L., Flynn, R. M., Green, C. S., Arnold, D., & Brooks, P. J. (2019). Digital games as a context for children’s cognitive development: Research recommendations and considerations. Social Policy Report, 32(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/sop2.3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouwer, R., Koster, M., & van den Bergh, H. (2018). Effects of a strategy-focused instructional program on the writing quality of upper elementary students in the Netherlands. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(1), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, R. H., & Caldwell, B. M. (1979). Home observation for measurement of the environment: A revision of the preschool scale. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 84, 235–244.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, R. H., & Caldwell, B. M. (1984). 174 children: A study of the relationship between home environment and cognitive development during the first 5 years. In A. W. Gottfried (Hrsg.), Home environment and early cognitive development (S. 5–56). New York: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, R. H., Whiteside, L., Mundrom, D. J., Casey, P. H., Kelleher, K. J., & Pope, S. K. (1994). Contribution of early intervention and early caregiving experiences to resilience in low-birth weight, premature children living in poverty. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 23, 425–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, R. H., Convyn, R. F., Burchinal, M., McAdoo, H. P., & García Coll, C. (2001). The home environments of children in the United States Part II: Relations with behavioral development through age thirteen. Child Development, 72, 1868–1886.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bratsberg, B., & Rogeberg, O. (2018). Flynn effect and its reversal are both environmentally caused. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(26), 201718793. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1718793115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brody, N. (1992). Intelligence (2. Aufl.). San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1993). The ecology of cognitive development: Research models and fugitive findings. In R. H. Wozniak & K. W. Fischer (Hrsg.), Development in context: Acting and thinking in specific environments (S. 3–44). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchinal, M. R., Campbell, F. A., Brayant, D. M., Wasik, B. H., & Ramey, C. T. (1997). Early intervention and mediating processes in cognitive performance of children of low-income African American families. Child Development, 68, 935–954.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cahan, S., & Cohen, N. (1989). Age versus schooling effects on intelligence development. Child Development, 60, 1239–1249.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, F. A., & Ramey, C. T. (2007). Carolina Abecedarian Project. Paper presented at the National Invitational Conference of the Early Childhood Research Collaborative on „Critical Issues in Cost Effectiveness in Children’s First Decade“, Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, F. A., Pungello, E. P., Miller-Johnson, S., Burchinal, M., & Ramey, C. T. (2001). The development of cognitive and academic abilities: Growth curves from an early childhood educational experiment. Developmental Psychology, 37, 231–242.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, F. A., Pungello, E. P., Burchinal, M., Kainz, K., Pan, Y., Wasik, B. H., & Ramey, C. T. (2012). Adult outcomes as a function of an early childhood educational program: An Abecedarian Project follow-up. Developmental Psychology, 48, 1033–1043.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Canobi, K. H., Reeve, R. A., & Pattison, P. E. (2002). Young children’s understanding of addition concepts. Educational Psychology, 22, 513–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. B. (2005). The three-stratum theory of cognitive abilities. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Hrsg.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (2. Aufl., S. 69–76). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, R., Griffin, S., & Kelly, W. M. (1999). Socioeconomic gradients in mathematical ability and their responsiveness to intervention during early childhood. In D. P. Keating & C. Hertzman (Hrsg.), Developmental health and the wealth of nations: Social, biological, and educational dynamics (S. 125–149). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618772271.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ceci, S. J. (1996). On intelligence: A bioecological treatise on intellectual development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chabris, C. F., Lee, J. J., Cesarini, D., Benjamin, D. J., & Laibson, D. I. (2015). The fourth law of behavior genetics. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(4), 304–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415580430.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chall, J. (1979). The great debate: Ten years later, with a modest proposal for reading stages. In L. B. Resnick & P. A. Weaver (Hrsg.), Theory and practice of early reading (Bd. 1, S. 29–55). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Church, R. B. (1999). Using gesture and speech to capture transitions in learning. Cognitive Development, 14, 313–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cianciolo, A. T., Matthew, C., Sternberg, R. J., & Wagner, R. K. (2006). Tacit knowledge, practical intelligence, and expertise. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Hrsg.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (S. 613–632). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Compton, D. L., Miller, A. C., Elleman, A. M., & Steacy, L. M. (2014). Have we forsaken reading theory in the name of „quick fix“ interventions for children with reading disability? Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.836200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyle, T. R., Pillow, D. R., Snyder, A. C., & Kochunov, P. (2012). Processing speed mediates the development of general intelligence (g) in adolescence. Psychological Science, 22, 1265–1269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611418243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cragg, L., & Gilmore, C. (2014). Skills underlying mathematics: The role of executive function in the development of mathematics proficiency. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 3(2), 63–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2013.12.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curry, D., Schmitt, M. J., & Waldron, S. (1996). A framework for adult numeracy standards: The mathematical skills and abilities adults need to be equipped for the future. Final report from the System Reform Planning Project of the Adult Numeracy Network. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. R. (2009). Ich fühle also bin ich. Die Entschlüsselung des Bewusstseins. [Originaltitel: The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness] (8. Aufl.). München: List.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deary, I. J. (2012). Intelligence. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 453–482.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deater-Deckard, K., Dodge, K. A., Bates, J. E., & Pettit, G. S. (1995). Risk factors for the development of externalizing behavior problems: Are there ethnic group differences in process? Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Indianapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, W., & Najarian, P. (1957). Infant development under environmental handicap. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 71, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devine, A., Fawcett, K., Szücs, D., & Dowker, A. (2012). Gender differences in mathematics anxiety and the relation to mathematics performance while controlling for test anxiety. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-8-33.

  • Duckworth, A. L., Quinn, P. D., Lynam, D. R., Loeber, R., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (2011). Role of test motivation in intelligence testing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(19), 7716–7720. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1018601108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duckworth, A. L., Quinn, P. D., & Tsukayama, E. (2012). What No Child Left Behind leaves behind: The roles of IQ and self-control in predicting standardized achievement test scores and report card grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 439–451. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026280.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, G. J., & Murnane, R. J. (2011). Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanov, P., & Japel, C. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1428–1446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C. (2014). Orthographic mapping in the acquisition of sight word reading, spelling memory, and vocabulary learning. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.819356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eppig, C., Fincher, C. L., & Thornhill, R. (2010). Parasite prevalence and the worldwide distribution of cognitive ability. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277, 3801–3808. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.0973.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fazio, L. K., DeWolf, M., & Siegler, R. S. (2016). Strategy use and strategy choice in fraction magnitude comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000153.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feitelson, D., & Goldstein, Z. (1986). Patterns of book ownership and reading to young children in Israeli school-oriented and nonschool-oriented families. The Reading Teacher, 39, 924–930.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, J. (1992). Variant views about good thinking during composing: Focus on revision. In M. Pressley, K. R. Harris, & J. T. Guthrie (Hrsg.), Promoting academic competence and literacy in school (S. 337–358). Bingley: Emerald Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, J. R. (1987). Massive IQ gains in 14 nations: What IQ tests really measure. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 171–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, J. R. (2009). What is intelligence? Beyond the Flynn effect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, R. M., & Richert, R. A. (2018). Cognitive, not physical, engagement in video gaming influences executive functioning. Journal of Cognition and Development, 19(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2017.1419246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, J. R., & Weiss, L. G. (2007). American IQ gains from 1931 to 2002: The WISC subtests and educational progress. International Journal of Testing, 7, 209–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foorman, B., Beyler, N., Borradaile, K., Coyne, M., Denton, C. A., Dimino, J., … Wissel, S. (2016). Foundational skills to support reading for understanding in kindergarten through 3rd grade (NCEE 2016-4008). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE), Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/PracticeGuide/wwc_foundationalreading_040717.pdf. Zugegriffen am 05.10.2020.

  • Franceschini, S., Trevisan, P., Ronconi, L., Bertoni, S., Colmar, S., Double, K., … Gori, S. (2017). Action video games improve reading abilities and visual-to-auditory attentional shifting in English-speaking children with dyslexia. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 5863. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05826-8.

  • Fuchs, L. S., Schumacher, R. F., Long, J., Namkung, J., Hamlett, C. L., Cirino, P. T., & Changas, P. (2013). Improving at-risk learners’ understanding of fractions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 683–700. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganzach, Y., Gotlibobski, C., Greenberg, D., & Pazy, A. (2013). General mental ability and pay: Nonlinear effects. Intelligence, 41(5), 631–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.07.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geary, D. C. (2005). The origin of mind: Evolution of brain, cognition, and general intelligence. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Geary, D. C. (2006). Development of mathematical understanding. In D. Kuhn & R. S. Siegler (Hrsg.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 2 Cognition, perception, and language (6. Aufl., S. 777–810). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Byrd-Craven, J., Nugent, L., & Numtee, C. (2007). Cognitive mechanisms underlying achievement deficits in children with mathematical learning disability. Child Development, 78, 1343–1359. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01069.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Nugent, L., & Bailey, D. H. (2012). Mathematical cognition deficits in children with learning disabilities and persistent low achievement: A five-year prospective study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 206–223. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025398.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gladwell, M. (2009). Überflieger: Warum manche Menschen erfolgreich sind – und andere nicht. Frankfurt: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, B. D., Maddox, W. T., & Love, B. C. (2013). Real-time strategy game training: Emergence of a cognitive flexibility trait. PLoS ONE, 8(8), Article e70350.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldin-Meadow, S., Cook, S. W., & Mitchell, Z. A. (2009). Gesturing gives children new ideas about math. Psychological Science, 20, 267–272.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, A., Gregg, P., & Washbrook, E. (2011). Children’s educational attainment and the aspirations, attitudes and behaviours of parents and children through childhood. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, 2(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.14301/llcs.v2i1.147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, L. S. (1997). Why g matters: The complexity of everyday life. Intelligence, 24, 79–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, L. S. (2011). Intelligence and social inequality: Why the biological link. In T. Chamorro-Premuzic, S. von Stumm, & A. Furnham (Hrsg.), Handbook of individual differences (S. 538–575). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1996). Self-regulation and strategy instruction for students who find writing and learning challenging. In I. C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Hrsg.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (S. 347–360). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., McKeown, D., Kiuhara, S., & Harris, K. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 879–896. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutman, L. M., Sameroff, A. J., & Cole, R. (2003). Academic growth curve trajectories from 1st grade to 12th grade: Effects of multiple social risk factors and preschool child factors. Developmental Psychology, 39, 777–790.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. F., Benbow, C. P., Geary, D. C., Gur, R. C., Hyde, J. S., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2007). The science of sex differences in science and mathematics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8, 1–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2007.00032.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, J. L., & McArdle, J. J. (2007). Understanding human intelligence since Spearman. In R. Cudeck & R. C. MacCallum (Hrsg.), Factor analysis at 100: Historical developments and future directions (S. 205–247). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulslander, J., Olson, R. K., Willcutt, E. G., & Wadsworth, S. J. (2011). Longitudinal stability of reading-related skills and their prediction of reading development. Scientific Studies of Reading, 14, 111–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/1088843100360405820563241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, L. G. (1989). Intelligence: Three kinds of instability and their consequences for policy. In R. L. Linn (Hrsg.), Intelligence (S. 193–216). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, J. M. (1961). Intelligence and experience. New York: Ronald Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huttenlocher, J., Levine, S., & Vevea, J. (1998). Environmental input and cognitive growth: A study using time-period comparisons. Child Development, 69, 1012–1029.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, A. R. (1973). Educability and group differences. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, N. C. (2007). Do words count? Connections between mathematics and reading difficulties. In D. B. Berch & M. M. M. Mazzocco (Hrsg.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (S. 107–120). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, N. C., Hansen, N., Fuchs, L. S., Siegler, R. S., Gersten, R., & Micklos, D. (2013). Developmental predictors of fraction concepts andprocedures. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116(1), 45–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2013.02.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437–447. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.4.437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, R. E., & Haier, R. J. (2007). The Parieto-Frontal Integration Theory (P-FIT) of intelligence: Converging neuroimaging evidence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30, 135–154. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X07001185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, C. Y., Duncan, G. J., Clements, D. H., Sarama, J., & Bailey, D. H. (2019). The roles of transfer of learning and forgetting in the persistence and fadeout of early childhood mathematics interventions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(4), 590–603. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000297.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, A. S., Raiford, S. E., & Coalson, D. L. (2016). Intelligence testing with WISC-V. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kell, H. J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2013). Who rises to the top? Early indicators. Psychological Science, 24(5), 648–659. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612457784.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kobasigawa, A., Ransom, C. C., & Holland, C. J. (1980). Children’s knowledge about skimming. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 26, 169–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korenman, S., Miller, J. E., & Sjaastad, J. E. (1995). Long-term poverty and child development in the United States: Results from the NLSY [Special Issue on Child Poverty, Public Practices, and Welfare Reform]. Children and Youth Services Review, 17, 127–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovas, Y., & Plomin, R. (2007). Learning abilities and disabilities: Generalist genes, specialist environments. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 284–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00521.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, K., Russ, S. A., Nelson, B. B., Olson, L. M., & Halfon, N. (2015). Cognitive ability at kindergarten entry and socioeconomic status. Pediatrics, 135, e440–e448. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-0434.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laski, E. V., & Yu, Q. (2014). Number line estimation and mental addition: Examining the potential roles of language and education. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 117, 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2013.08.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lazar, I., Darlington, R., Murray, H., Royce, J., & Snipper, A. (1982). Lasting effects of early education: A report from the Consortium for Longitudinal Studies. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 47, 1–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Corre, M., & Carey, S. (2007). One, two, three, four, nothing more: An investigation of the conceptual sources of the verbal counting principles. Cognition, 105, 395–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.10.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LeFevre, J.-A., Bisanz, J., Daley, K. E., Buffone, L., Greenham, S. L., & Sadesky, G. S. (1996). Multiple routes to solution of single-digit multiplication problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 284–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemaire, P. (2010). Cognitive strategy variations during aging. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 363–369. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410390354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lervåg, A., Hulme, C., & Melby-Lervåg, M. (2018). Unpicking the developmental relationship between oral language skills and reading comprehension: It’s simple, but complex. Child Development, 89(5), 1821–1838. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12861.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, F. K. S., Park, K., Shimizu, Y., & Xu, B. (2015). Mathematics education in East Asia. In S. J. Cho (Hrsg.), The proceedings of the 12th international congress on mathematical education (S. 123–143). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12688-3_11.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, I., & Aram, D. (2013). Promoting early literacy via practicing invented spelling: A comparison of different mediation routines. Reading Research Quarterly, 48, 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, I., & Korat, O. (1993). Sensitivity to phonological, morphological, and semantic cues in early reading and writing in Hebrew. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 39, 213–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonigan, C. J. (2015). Early literacy. In L. S. Liben & U. M. Müller (Hrsg.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Vol. 2 Cognitive processes (7. Aufl., S. 763–805). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lortie-Forgues, H., Tian, J., & Siegler, R. S. (2015). Why is learning fraction and decimal arithmetic so difficult? Developmental Review, 38, 201–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2015.07.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love, J. M., Chazan-Cohen, R., & Raikes, H. (2007). Forty years of research knowledge and use: From Head Start to Early Head Start and beyond. In J. L. Aber, S. J. Bishop-Josef, S. M. Jones, K. T. McLearn, & D. A. Phillips (Hrsg.), Child development and social policy: Knowledge for action (S. 79–95). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lubinski, D., & Humphreys, L. G. (1997). Incorporating general intelligence into epidemiology and the social sciences. Intelligence, 24, 159–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubinski, D., Webb, R. M., Morelock, M. J., & Benbow, C. P. (2001). Top 1 in 10,000: A 10-year follow-up of the profoundly gifted. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 718–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Kell, H. J. (2014). Life paths and accomplishments of mathematically precocious males and females four decades later. Psychological Science, 25(12), 2217–2232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614551371.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, R. (2009). What has caused the Flynn effect? Secular increases in the Development Quotients of infants. Intelligence, 37, 16–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, I. M., & Beilock, S. L. (2012). When math hurts: Math anxiety predicts pain network activation in anticipation of doing math. PLoS ONE, 7, e48076. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048076.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mabbott, D. J., & Bisanz, J. (2003). Developmental change and individual differences in children’s multiplication. Child Development, 74, 1091–1107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, G. W., & Cornwall, A. (1995). The relationship between phonological awareness and reading and spelling achievement eleven years later. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 523–527.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maclean, M., Bryant, P., & Bradley, L. (1987). Rhymes, nursery rhymes, and reading in early childhood. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33, 255–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makel, M. C., Kell, H. J., Lubinski, D., Putallaz, M., & Benbow, C. P. (2016). When lightning strikes twice: Profoundly gifted, profoundly accomplished. Psychological Science, 27(7), 1004–1018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616644735.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, E. A., Ramirez, G., Gunderson, E. A., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2015). Intergenerational effects of parents’ math anxiety on children’s math achievement and anxiety. Psychological Science, 26(9), 1480–1488. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615592630.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, D. P., & Olson, B. D. (2010). Personality development: Continuity and change over the life course. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 517–542. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100507.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McBride-Chang, C. (2004). Children’s literacy development. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, M. (2007). Quantitative literacy and developmental dyscalculias. In D. B. Berch & M. M. M. Mazzocco (Hrsg.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (S. 415–429). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCutchen, D. (2011). From novice to expert: Implications of language skills and writing-relevant knowledge for memory during the development of writing skill. Journal of Writing Research, 3(1), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2011.03.01.3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, M. A. (2005). Big-brained people are smarter: A meta-analysis of the relationship between in vivo brain volume and intelligence. Intelligence, 33, 337–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2004.11.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGue, M., Bouchard, T. J., Jr., Iacono, W. G., & Lykken (1993). Behavioral genetics of cognitive ability: A life-span perspective. In R. Plomin & G. E. McClearn (Hrsg.), Nature, nurture and psychology (S. 59–76). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, N. M., Fyfe, E. R., Petersen, L. A., Dunwiddie, A. E., & Brletic-Shipley, H. (2011). Benefits of practicing 4=2+2: Nontraditional problem formats facilitate children’s understanding of mathematical equivalence. Child Development, 82, 1620–1633.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, A. M., & Ashcraft, M. H. (2013). Emotionality in mathematical problem solving. In C. Mohiyeddini, M. Eysenck, & S. Bauer (Hrsg.), Handbook of psychology of emotions: Recent theoretical perspectives and novel empirical findings (S. 115–141). Hauppauge: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee, H. B. (2016). Education for fullness: A study of the educational thought and experiment of Rabindranath Tagore. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nation, K. (2008). Learning to read words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1121–1133. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210802034603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, T. (1999). Reading comprehension processes. In G. B. Thompson & T. Nicholson (Hrsg.), Learning to read: Beyond phonics and whole language (S. 127–149). Newark: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R. E., Aronson, J., Blair, C., Dickens, W., Flynn, J., Halpern, D. F., & Turkheimer, E. (2012). Intelligence: New findings and theoretical developments. American Psychologist, 67, 130–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, B., Dale, P. S., & Plomin, R. (2004). Verbal and nonverbal predictors of early language problems: An analysis of twins in early childhood back to infancy. Journal of Child Language, 31, 609–631.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, S. L., Bates, J. E., & Kaskie, B. (1992). Caregiver-infant interaction antecedents of children’s school-age cognitive ability. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 38, 309–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R. K., Keenan, J. M., Byrne, B., & Samuelsson, S. (2014). Why do children differ in their development of reading and related skills? Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.800521.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2018). Policy brief on child well-being: Poor children in rich countries: Why we need policy action. OECD, October 2018. https://www.oecd.org/els/family/Poor-children-in-rich-countries-Policy-brief-2018.pdf. Zugegriffen am 27.09.2020.

  • Palincsar, A. S., & Magnusson, S. J. (2001). The interplay of first-hand and second-hand investigations to model and support the development of scientific knowledge and reasoning. In S. M. Carver & D. Klahr (Hrsg.), Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (S. 151–187). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C., & Stafura, J. (2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.827687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, C., Zorzi, M., & Ziegler, J. C. (2019). Understanding dyslexia through personalized large-scale computational models. Psychological Science, 30(3), 386–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618823540.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petermann, F. (Hrsg.). (2017). WISC-V: Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children – Fifth Edition. Frankfurt a. M.: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. L., Pennington, B. F., & Olson, R. K. (2013). Subtypes of developmental dyslexia: Testing the predictions of the dual-route and connectionist frameworks. Cognition, 126(1), 20–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.08.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petrill, S. A., Lipton, P. A., Hewitt, J. K., Plomin, R., Cherny, S. S., Corley, R., & DeFries, J. C. (2004). Genetic and environmental contributions to general cognitive ability through the first 16 years of life. Developmental Psychology, 40, 805–812. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.40.5.805.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Petrill, S. A., Deater-Deckard, K., Thompson, L. A., Schatschneider, C., Dethorne, L. S., & Vandenbergh, D. J. (2007). Longitudinal genetic analysis of early reading. The Western Reserve Reading Project. Reading and Writing, 20, 127–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9021-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Piasta, S. B., & Wagner, R. K. (2010). Developing early literacy skills: A meta-analysis of alphabet learning and instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 8–38. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.45.1.2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pietschnig, J., & Voracek, M. (2015). One century of global IQ gains: A formal meta-analysis of the Flynn effect (1909–2013). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(3), 282–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615577701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Plomin, R., & Daniels, D. (2011). Why are children in the same family so different from one another? International Journal of Epidemiology, 40(3), 563–582. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyq148.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Plomin, R., & Deary, I. J. (2015). Genetics and intelligence differences: Five special findings. Molecular Psychiatry, 20(1), 98–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Plomin, R., Fulker, D. W., Corley, R., & DeFries, J. C. (1997). Nature, nurture, and cognitive development from 1 to 16 years: A parent-offspring adoption study. Psychological Science, 8, 442–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powers, K. L., Brooks, P. J., Aldrich, N. J., Palladino, M. A., & Alfieri, L. (2013). Effects of video-game play on information processing: A meta-analytic investigation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 1055–1079. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0418-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., & Hilden, K. (2006). Cognitive strategies: Production deficiencies and successful strategy instruction everywhere. In D. Kuhn & R. S. Siegler (Hrsg.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 2 Cognition, perception, and language (6. Aufl., S. 511–556). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puma, M., Bell, S., Cook, R., Heid, C., Broene, P., Jenkins, F., … Downer, J. T. (2012). Third grade follow-up to the Head Start impact study: Final report [Executive summary] (OPRE Report 2012-45b). Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED539264. Zugegriffen am 05.10.2020.

  • Quinn, G. E., Shin, C. H., Maguire, M. G., & Stone, R. A. (1999). Myopia and ambient lighting at night. Nature, 399, 113–114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ramey, C. T., & Ramey, S. L. (2004). Early learning and school readiness: Can early intervention make a difference? Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 50, 471–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramey, C. T., Campbell, F. A., Burchinal, M., Skinner, M. L., Gardner, D. M., & Ramey, S. L. (2000). Persistent effects of early childhood education on high-risk children and their mothers. Applied Developmental Science, 4, 2–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez, G., & Beilock, S. L. (2011). Writing about testing worries boosts exam performance in the classroom. Science, 331, 211–213.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez, G., Gunderson, E. A., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2012). Spatial anxiety relates to spatial abilities as a function of working memory in children. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 474–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2011.616214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, A. J., Temple, J. A., & Ou, S. R. (2010). Preschool education, educational attainment, and crime prevention: Contributions of cognitive and non-cognitive skills. Children and Youth Services Review, 32(8), 1054–1063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.10.019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, S. J. (2016). Intelligence: All that matters. London: Hodder & Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, S. J., & Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2018). How much does education improve intelligence? A meta-analysis. Psychological Science, 29(8), 1358–1369. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618774253.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Röber-Siekmeyer, C. (2004). Schrifterwerb. In K. Knapp, G. Antos, M. Becker-Mrotzek, A. Deppermann, S. Göpferich, J. Grabowski, M. Klemm, & C. Villiger (Hrsg.), Angewandte Linguistik (S. 5–25). Tübingen: Narr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, P. R., Borneman, M. J., & Connelly, B. S. (2008). High stakes testing in higher education and employment: Appraising the evidence for validity and fairness. American Psychologist, 63, 215–227. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.4.215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salthouse, T. A. (2009). Decomposing age correlations on neuropsychological and cognitive variables. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 15, 650–661. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617709990385.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sameroff, A. J., Seifer, R., Baldwin, A., & Baldwin, C. (1993). Stability of intelligence from preschool to adolescence: The influence of social and family risk factors. Child Development, 64, 80–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scarr, S. (1992). Developmental theories for the 1990s: Development and individual differences. Child Development, 63, 1–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schlaggar, B. L., & Church, J. A. (2009). Functional neuroimaging insights into the development of skilled reading. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 21–26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. (2004). General mental ability in the world of work: Occupational attainment and job performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 162–173. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.162.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, M., Merz, S., Stricker, J., De Smedt, B., Torbeyns, J., Verschaffel, L., & Luwel, K. (2018). Associations of number line estimation with mathematical competence: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 89(5), 1467–1484. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13068.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Segal, N. L., McGuire, S. A., Havlena, J., Gill, P., & Hershberger, S. L. (2007). Intellectual similarity of virtual twin pairs: Developmental trends. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 1209–1219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.028.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Shalev, R. S. (2007). Prevalence of developmental dyscalculia. In D. B. Berch & M. M. M. Mazzocco (Hrsg.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (S. 49–60). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Share, D. L. (2004). Knowing letter names and learning letter sounds: A causal connection. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 88, 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2004.03.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shaywitz, S. E., Mody, M., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2006). Neural mechanisms in dyslexia. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 278–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, L. S. (1993). The cognitive basis of dyslexia. In M. L. Howe & R. Pasnak (Hrsg.), Minnesota symposia on child psychology: Vol. 2 Competencies Emerging themes in cognitive development (S. 33–52). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, R. S. (1986). Unities in strategy choices across domains. In M. Perlmutter (Hrsg.), Perspectives on intellectual development (Bd. 19, S. 1–48). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, R. S. (1987). The perils of averaging data over strategies: An example from children’s addition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 250–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, R. S. (1996). Emerging minds: The process of change in children’s thinking. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, R. S., & Booth, J. L. (2004). Development of numerical estimation in young children. Child Development, 75, 428–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00684.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, R. S., & Mu, Y. (2008). Chinese children excel on novel mathematics problems even before elementary school. Psychological Science, 19, 759–763. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02153.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, R. S., & Ramani, G. B. (2009). Playing linear number board games – but not circular ones – improves low-income preschoolers’ numerical understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 545–560. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, T. J., & Rivera, S. M. (2007). Neuroanatomical approaches to the study of mathematical ability and disability. In D. B. Berch & M. M. M. Mazzocco (Hrsg.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (S. 283–305). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. A., & Murphy, V. A. (2015). Measuring productive elements of multi-word phrase vocabulary knowledge among children with English as an additional or only language. Reading and Writing, 28(3), 347–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-014-9527-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solis, M., Ciullo, S., Vaughn, S., Pyle, N., Hassaram, B., & Leroux, A. (2012). Reading comprehension interventions for middle school students with learning disabilities: A synthesis of 30 years of research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(4), 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219411402691.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, C. E. (1927). The abilities of man, their nature and measurement. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistisches Bundesamt. (2020). Qualitätsbericht: Mikrozensus 2019. https://www.destatis.de/DE/Methoden/Qualitaet/Qualitaetsberichte/Bevoelkerung/mikrozensus-2019.pdf?__blob=publicationFile. Zugegriffen am 05.10.2020.

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1999). The theory of successful intelligence. Review of General Psychology, 3, 292–316. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.3.4.292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (2003). A broad view of intelligence: The theory of successful intelligence. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 55, 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1037/1061-4087.55.3.139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (2008). g, g’s, or Jeez: Which is the best model for developing abilities, competencies, and expertise? In P. C. Kyllonen, R. D. Roberts, & L. Stankov (Hrsg.), Extending intelligence: Enhancement and new constructs (S. 225–266). New York: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, H., Black, J. M., Hulme, C., Stanley, L. M., Kesler, S. R., Whitfield-Gabrieli, S., & Hoeft, F. (2011). The brain basis of the phonological deficit in dyslexia is independent of IQ. Psychological Science, 22, 1442–1451.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (2006). Dynamic systems theories. In R. M. Lerner (Hrsg.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1 Theoretical models of human development (6. Aufl., S. 258–312). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. A., & Opfer, J. E. (2010). How 15 hundred is like 15 cherries: Effect of progressive alignment on representational changes in numerical cognition. Child Development, 81, 1768–1786. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01509.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L. L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolchinsky, L. (2003). The cradle of culture and what children know about writing and numbers before being taught. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Totsika, V., & Sylva, K. (2004). The home observation for measurement of the environment revisited. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 9(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1475-357X.2003.00073.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trzaskowski, M., Yang, J., Visscher, P. M., & Plomin, R. (2014). DNA evidence for strong genetic stability and increasing heritability of intelligence from age 7 to 12. Molecular Psychiatry, 19(3), 380–384.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker-Drob, E. M., & Bates, T. C. (2016). Large cross-national differences in gene × socioeconomic status interaction on intelligence. Psychological Science, 27(2), 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615612727.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker-Drob, E. M., Rhemtulla, M., Harden, K. P., Turkheimer, E., & Fask, D. (2011). Emergence of a gene 3 socioeconomic status interaction on infant mental ability between 10 months and 2 years. Psychological Science, 22, 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610392926.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turkheimer, E., Haley, A., Waldron, M., D’Onofrio, B., & Gottesman, I. I. (2003). Socioeconomic status modifies heritability of IQ in young children. Psychological Science, 14, 623–628.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families. (2010). Head start impact study: Final report, executive summary. https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/opre/executive_summary_final_508.pdf. Zugegriffen am 05.10.2020.

  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families. (2019). Head start program facts: Fiscal year 2018. https://eclkc.ohs.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/no-search/hs-program-fact-sheet-2018.pdf. Zugegriffen am 05.10.2020.

  • Uhlhaas, P. J., Roux, F., Rodriguez, E., Rotarska-Jagiela, A., & Singer, W. (2010). Neural synchrony and the development of cortical networks. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(2), 72–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.12.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Unsworth, N., Redick, T. S., McMillan, B. D., Hambrick, D. Z., Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2015). Is playing video games related to cognitive abilities? Psychological Science, 26(6), 759–774. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615570367.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vellutino, F. R., & Scanlon, D. M. (1987). Phonological coding, phonological awareness, and reading ability: Evidence from a longitudinal and experimental study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33, 321–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, P. A., Wickett, J. C., Bazana, P. G., & Stelmack, R. M. (2000). The neuropsychology and psychophysiology of human intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Hrsg.), Handbook of intelligence (S. 245–266). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z., Sabatini, J., O’Reilly, T., & Weeks, J. (2019). Decoding and reading comprehension: A test of the decoding threshold hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(3), 387–401. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, H. S. (1980). „Class news“: A single-subject longitudinal study of prose production and schema formation during childhood. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 152–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, T. W., Duncan, G. J., Siegler, R. S., & Davis-Kean, P. E. (2014). What’s past is prologue: Relations between early mathematics knowledge and high school achievement. Educational Researcher, 43(7), 352–360. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14553660.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • West, J., Denton, K., & Germino-Hausken, E. (2000). America’s kindergartners. NCES, Bd. 2000-070. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westinghouse Learning Corporation. (1969). The impact of Head Start: An evaluation of the effects of Head Start on children’s cognitive and affective development. Springfield: Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific & Technical Information.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehurst, G. J., Zevenbergen, A. A., Crone, D. A., Schultz, M. D., Velting, O. N., & Fischel, J. E. (1999). Outcomes of an emergent literacy intervention from Head Start through second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 261–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willingham, D. T. (2017). The reading mind: A cognitive approach to understanding how the mind reads. San Francisco: Josey-Bass/Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, C. B., Wu, S. S., & Menon, V. (2012). The neurodevelopmental basis of math anxiety. Psychological Science, 23, 492–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611429134.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zevenbergen, A. A., & Whitehurst, G. J. (2003). Dialogic reading: A shared picture book reading intervention for preschoolers. In A. van Kleeck, S. A. Stahl, & E. B. Bauer (Hrsg.), On reading books to children: Parents and teachers (S. 177–200). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zigler, E., & Styfco, S. J. (2004). The wisdom of a federal effort on behalf of impoverished children and their families. In E. Zigler & S. J. Styfco (Hrsg.), The Head Start debates (S. 221–249). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, USA

    Robert Siegler

  2. Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, USA

    Jenny R. Saffran

  3. Population Research Center, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA

    Elizabeth T. Gershoff

  4. Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, USA

    Nancy Eisenberg

Authors
  1. Robert Siegler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jenny R. Saffran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Elizabeth T. Gershoff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nancy Eisenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Siegler .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert durch Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Siegler, R., Saffran, J.R., Gershoff, E.T., Eisenberg, N. (2021). Intelligenz und schulische Leistungen. In: Entwicklungspsychologie im Kindes- und Jugendalter. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-62772-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-62772-3_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-62771-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-62772-3

  • eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation