Advertisement

Eine pragmatistische Theorie technologischer Innovation

Chapter
  • 84 Downloads

Zusammenfassung

Der Beitrag entwickelt eine pragmatistische Theorie technologischer Innovation. Anders als die Wirtschaftswissenschaften und der Mediendiskurs zum Unternehmertum, betont eine pragmatistische Perspektive die zentrale Rolle von Institutionen und kollektivem Handeln für die Entwicklung innovativer Problemlösungen. Somit erlaubt sie, das für die Entwicklung von technologischen Innovationen wichtige Wechselspiel zwischen Routinen, Irritationen und kreativem Handeln zu verstehen.

Schlüsselwörter

Innovation Pragmatismus Dewey Kreativität Technologie 

Literatur

  1. Acemoglu, Daron, James A. Robinson, und Thierry Verdier. 2017. Asymmetric growth and institutions in an interdependent world. Journal of Political Economy 125 (5): 1245–1305.Google Scholar
  2. Aghion, Philippe, und Peter W. Howitt. 1997. Endogenous growth theory. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Alvarez, Jose Luis. 1991. The International diffusion and institutionalization of the new entrepreneurship movement: A study in the sociology of organizational knowledge. Doctoral Dissertation. Cambridge MA: Harvard University.Google Scholar
  4. Baumol, William J. 1968. Entrepreneurship in economic theory. American Economic Review 58 (2): 64–71.Google Scholar
  5. Baumol, William J. 2004. Education for Innovation: Entrepreneurial Breakthroughs vs. Corporate Incremental Improvements.NBER Working Paper. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  6. Beckert, Jens. 1996. What is sociological about economic sociology? uncertainty and the embeddedness of economic action. Theory and Society 25 (6): 803–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beckert, Jens. 2009. Pragmatismus und wirtschaftliches Handeln.MPIfG Discussion Paper 09/4. Köln: Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.Google Scholar
  8. Beckert, Jens. 2016. Imagined futures: Fictional expectations and capitalist dynamics. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berger, Peter L. und Thomas Luckmann. 1967. The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  10. Berman, Elizabeth Popp. 2012. Creating the market university: How academic science became an economic engine. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Berman, Elizabeth Popp. 2013. Not just neoliberalism: Economization in US science and technology policy. Science, Technology, and Human Values 39 (3): 397–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bijker, Wiebe W., Thomas P. Hughes, und Trevor J. Pinch (Hrsg.). 1987. The social construction of technological systems. New directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. Blaug, Mark. 1990. Economic theory in retrospect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Block, Fred. 2008. Swimming against the current: The rise of a hidden developmental state in the United States. Politics and Society 36 (2): 169–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bourdieu, Pierre, und Loïc Wacquant. 1996. Reflexive anthropologie. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  16. Burgin, Angus. 2018. The Reinvention of Entrepreneurship. In The American Labyrinth: Intellectual History for Complicated Times, Hrsg. Raymond Haberski Jr., und Andrew Hartman, 163–180. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Camic, Charles. 1986. The Matter of Habit. American Journal of Sociology 91 (5): 1039–1087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dahms, Harry F. 1995. From Creative Action to the Social Rationalization of the Economy: Joseph A Schumpeter’s Social Theory. Sociological Theory 13 (1): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. DeNora, Tia. 1995. Beethoven and the Construction of Genius: Musical Politics in Vienna, 1792–1803. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dewey, John. [1922] 2008a. Human Nature and Conduct. An Introduction to Social Psychology. In The Collected Works of John Dewey, Vol. 14: 1922, Hrsg. Jo Ann Boydston. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Dewey, John. [1933] 2008b. How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process. In The Collected Works of John Dewey, Vol. 8: 1933, Hrsg. Jo Ann Boydston, 105–352. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Ergen, Timur. 2018. The Dilemma between Aligned Expectations and Diversity in Innovation: Evidence from Early Energy Technology Policies. In Uncertain Futures: Imaginaries, Narratives, and Calculation in the Economy, Hrsg. Jens Beckert und Richard Bronk, 298–318. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Evans, Peter. 1995. Embedded Autonomy. States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Garud, Raghu, und Peter Karnøe. 2003. Bricolage Versus Breakthrough: Distributed and Embedded Agency in Technology Entrepreneurship. Research Policy 32 (2): 277–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grabher, Gernot. 1994. Lob der Verschwendung: Redundanz in der Regionalentwicklung; Ein sozioökonomisches Plädoyer. Berlin: Sigma.Google Scholar
  26. Hall, Peter A., und Rosemary C. R. Taylor. 1996. Political Science and the Three Institutionalisms. Political Studies 44 (5): 936–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hartmann, Martin. 2003. Die Kreativität der Gewohnheit. Grundzüge einer pragmatistischen Demokratietheorie. Frankfurt a. M., New York: Campus.Google Scholar
  28. Hennart, Jean-François. 2009. Theories of the Multinational Enterprise. In The Oxford Handbook of International Business, Hrsg. Alan M. Rugman, 127–149. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Herrigel, Gary. 2017. Experimentalist Systems in Manufacturing Multinationals: German Automobile and Machinery Examples.Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  30. von Hippel, Eric. 1988. The Sources of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Hoddeson, Lillian. 1981. The Emergence of Basic Research in the Bell Telephone System, 1875–1915. Technology and Culture 22 (3): 512–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hughes, Thomas S. 1983. Networks of Power. Electrification in Western Society, 1880–1930. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Joas, Hans. 1992. Kreativität des Handelns. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  34. Joas, Hans, und Jens Beckert. 2007. Action Theory. In Handbook of Sociological Theory, Hrsg. Jonathan H. Turner, 269–285. New York: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  35. Kleinman, Daniel L., und Steven P. Vallas. 2001. Science, Capitalism, and the Rise of the ’Knowledge Worker’. Theory and Society 30 (4): 451–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kristensen, Peer Hull, und Jonathan Zeitlin. 2005. Local Players in Global Games: The Strategic Constitution of a Multinational Corporation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Lester, Richard K., und Michael J. Piore. 2004. Innovation: The Missing Dimension. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  38. March, James G. 1995. The Future, Disposable Organizations and the Rigidities of Imagination. Organization 2 (3/4): 427–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. March, James G., und Herbert A. Simon. 1958. Organizations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  40. Mayntz, Renate. 2004. Mechanisms in the Analysis of Social Macro-Phenomena. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34 (2): 237–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mazzucato, Mariana. 2013. The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
  42. Menke, Christoph. 2018. Autonomie und Befreiung: Studien zu Hegel.Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  43. Mowery, David C., und Nathan Rosenberg. 1995. Technology and the Pursuit of Economic Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Nelson, Richard R., und Sidney G. Winter. 1977. In Search of a Useful Theory of Innovation. Research Policy 6: 36–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Parsons, Talcott. 1990. Prolegomena to a Theory of Social Institutions. American Sociological Review 55 (3): 319–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rammert, Werner. 1988. Das Innovationsdilemma. Technikentwicklung im Unternehmen. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  47. Rose, Mark. 1995. Authors and Owners: The Invention of Copyright. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Rosenberg, Nathan. 1982. Inside the Black Box. Technology and Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Sabel, Charles F. 2005. A Real-Time Revolution in Routines. In The Firm as a Collaborative Community: The Reconstruction of Trust in the Knowledge Economy, Hrsg. Charles Heckscher und Paul Adler, 106–156. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1912. Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
  51. Schumpeter, Joseph A. [1942] 1993. Kapitalismus, Sozialismus und Demokratie. Tübingen: Francke.Google Scholar
  52. Schwartz Cowan, Ruth. 1987. The consumption junction: A proposal for research strategies in the sociology of technology. In The social construction of technological systems. New directions in the sociology and history of technology, Hrsg. Wiebe W. Bijker, Thomas P. Hughes, und Trevor J. Pinch, 261–280. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  53. Stark, David. 2009. The sense of dissonance: Accounts of worth in economic life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Swedberg, Richard. 2000. The social science view of entrepreneurship: Introduction and practical applications. In Entrepreneurship: The social science view, Hrsg. Richard Swedberg, 7–44. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Economist, The. 1999. Innovation in industry: Industry gets religion. The Economist 20. Februar 1999: 5–8.Google Scholar
  56. Warfield Rawls, Anne. 2011. Garfinkel, Ethnomethodology and the defining questions of Pragmatism. Qualitative Sociology 34 (1): 277–282.Google Scholar
  57. Weir, Margaret, Jane Rongerude, und Christopher K. Ansell. 2011. Collaboration is not enough. Virtuous cycles of reform in transportation policy. Urban Affairs Review 44(4): 455–489.Google Scholar
  58. Ziegler, J. Nicholas. 1997. Governing ideas. Strategies for innovation in France and Germany. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert durch Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE , ein Teil von Springer Nature 2021

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Max-Planck-Institut für GesellschaftsforschungKölnDeutschland

Personalised recommendations