Abstract
Autoethnography can be described as a combination of autobiographical and ethnographic practices. It is a method that emphasizes the researcher’s emotions and experiences. For the most part, autoethnography comes in written form, based on introspection of one’s memory as well as on field notes, diary entries, drawings, or photographs. The visual material, however, is mostly regarded as a stimulant for emotional recall and not as autoethnography itself. The following contribution therefore explores how autoethnography and photography can be combined through the medium of the photo-essay. The photo-essay is based on fieldwork experiences in Detroit, MI, between 2016 and 2019. It is an attempt to question and unveil my positionality and the situatedness of (my) knowledge (production), aiming towards a more reflexive way of doing ethnography.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barthes, R. (1987). Image, music. Text: Fontana Press, London.
Bochner, A. P., & Ellis, C. (2016). Evocative autoethnography: Writing lives and telling stories. Writing lives: Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek.
Burnier, D. (2006). Encounters with the Self in social science research: A political scientist looks at autoethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35(4), 410–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241606286982
Butz, D. (2010). Autoethnography as sensibility. In D. DeLyser (Hrsg.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Geography (p. 138–155). London: SAGE.
Butz, D., & Besio, K. (2009). Autoethnography. Geography Compass, 3, 1660–1674. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2009.00279.x
Chaplin, E. (2011). The photo diary as an autoethnographic method. In E. Margolis & L. Pauwels (Hrsg.), The SAGE handbook of visual research methods (p. 241–262). Los Angeles: SAGE.
Curtis, N. (2009). ‘As if’: Situating the pictorial turn. Culture, Theory & Critique, 50(2–3), 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735780903240067
Denshire, S (2013) Autoethnography. In: Sociopedia. https://doi.org/10.1177/205684601351
Denzin, N. K. (1989). Interpretive biography. Newbury Park: SAGE.
Dirksmeier, P. (2006). Der husserlsche Bildbegriff als theoretische Grundlage der reflexiven Fotografie: Ein Beitrag zur visuellen Methodologie in der Humangeografie. Social Geography Discussions, 2, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.5194/sgd-2-1-2006
Ellis, C. (1997). Evocative autoethnography: writing emotionally about our lives. In W. G. Tierney & Y. S. Lincoln (Hrsg.), Representation and the text: Re-framing the narrative voice (p. 115–139). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Ellis, C. (1999). Heartful autoethnography. Qualitative Health Research, 9, 669–683. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973299129122153
Ellis, C. (2007). Telling secrets, revealing lives: Relational ethics in research with intimate others. Qualitative Inquiry, 13, 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800406294947
Ellis, C. (2004). The ethnographic I: A methodological novel about autoethnography. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.
Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. P. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Hrsg.), Handbook of qualitative research (p. 733–768). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., Bochner, A. P. (2010). Autoethnography: An overview. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 12(1). https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1589. Accessed: 22. June 2020.
Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cybords, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.
Hyndman, J. (2001). The field as here and now, not there and then. Geographical Review, 91(1/2), 262–272.
Katz, C. (1994). Playing the field: Questions of fieldwork in geography. The Professional Geographer, 46(1), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00067.x
Lapadat, J. C. (2017). Ethics in autoethnography and collaborative autoethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 23, 589–603. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417704462
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Malden: Blackwell (initial release 1974).
Mitchell, W. J. T. (1994). Picture theory: Essays on verbal and visual representation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Moxey, K. (2008). Visual studies and the iconic turn. Journal of Visual Culture, 7(2), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412908091934
Nast, H. J. (1994). Women in the field: Critical feminist methodologies and theoretical perspectives. The Professional Geographer, 46(1), 54–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00054.x
Ngunjiri, F. W., Hernandez, K. A. C., & Chang, H. (2010). Living autoethnography: Connecting life and research. Journal of Research Practice, 6(1), 1–17.
Ownby, T. (2013). Critical visual methodology: Photographs and narrative text as a visual autoethnography. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 3, 1–24.
Ploder, A., & Stadlbauer, J. (2016). Strong reflexivity and its critics: Responses to autoethnography in the German-speaking cultural and social sciences. Qualitative Inquiry, 22(9), 753–765. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800416658067
Pink, S. (2007). Doing visual ethnography: Images. Sage: Media and Representation in Research.
Reed-Danahay, D. (1997). Introduction. In D. Reed-Danahay (Hrsg.), Auto/ethnography: Rewriting the self and the social (p. 1–17). Oxford: Berg.
Reed-Danahay, D. (2017). Bourdieu and critical autoethnography: Implications for research, writing, and teaching. International Journal of Multicultural Education 19:144–154. https://doi.org/10.18251/ijme.v19i1.1368
Rose, G. (1997). Situating knowledges: Positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Progress in Human Geography, 21(3), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913297673302122
Rose, G. (2001). Visual methodologies: An introduction to the interpretation of visual materials. London: Sage.
Rose, G. (2014). On the relation between ‘Visual Research Methods’ and contemporary visual culture. The Sociological Review, 62, 24–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12109
Schlottmann, A., & Miggelbrink, J. (2009). Visuelle Geographien – Ein Editorial. Social Geography, 4, 13–24. https://doi.org/10.5194/sg-4-13-2009
Thrift, N. (2003). Practising ethics. In M. Pryke, G. Rose, & S. Whatmore (Hrsg.), Using social theory (p. 106–121). London: Sage.
van Leeuwen, T. (2011). Multimodality and multimodal research. In E. Margolis & L. Pauwels (Hrsg.), The SAGE handbook of visual research methods (p. 549–569). Los Angeles: Sage.
Winkler, I. (2018). Doing autoethnography: Facing challenges, taking choices, accepting responsibilities. Qualitative Inquiry, 24, 236–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417728956
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Küttel, N.M. (2021). Autoethnography and Photo-Essay. In: Kogler, R., Wintzer, J. (eds) Raum und Bild - Strategien visueller raumbezogener Forschung. Springer Spektrum, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-61965-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-61965-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer Spektrum, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-61964-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-61965-0
eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)