Zusammenfassung
Mehr als 300.000 Hernien werden jedes Jahr in Deutschland operiert; dieses Krankheitsbild ist daher eines der meist operierten. Trotz der hohen Anzahl dieser Operationen bleiben Komplikationen sowie postoperative Schmerzen, Infektionen und Rezidive weiter eine Herausforderung. Ein Grund dafür sind die Unterschiede in der Hernien-Anatomie, des Bruchinhaltes und des jeweiligen aktuellen klinischen Erscheinungsbildes. Eine besondere Situation stellt die inkarzerierte Hernie dar, die zu schwerwiegenden Komplikationen führen kann. Die jeweilige Diagnostik sowie die führenden Techniken, sowohl laparoskopisch als auch offen, werden in diesem Kapitel dargestellt.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Literatur
Literatur zu den Abschn. 13.1, 13.2, 13.3 und 13.4
European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients; Hernia (2009) 13: 343–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-009-0529-7
Schumpelick V (Hrsg) (2011) Gastroenterologische Chirurgie, 3. Aufl. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg
Weiterführende Literatur
Literatur zu den Abschn. 13.1, 13.2, 13.3 und 13.4
Bakker WJ, Aufenacker TJ, Boschman JS, Burgmans JPJ (2020) Lightweight mesh is recommended in open inguinal (Lichtenstein) hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgery 167:581–589
Bernardi K, Olavarria OA, Holihan JL, Kao LS, Ko TC, Roth JS, Tsuda S, Vaziri K, Liang MK (2019) Primary fascial closure during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair improves patient quality of life: a multicenter, blinded randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 271:434–439
Blonk L, Civil YA, Kaufmann R, Ket JCF, van der Velde S (2019) A systematic review on surgical treatment of primary epigastric hernias. Hernia 23:847–857
Bökkerink WJV, Koning GG, Malagic D, van Hout L, van Laarhoven CJHM, Vriens PWHE (2019) Long-term results from a randomized comparison of open transinguinal preperitoneal hernia repair and the Lichtenstein method (TULIP trial). Br J Surg 106:856–861
Bullen NL, Massey LH, Antoniou SA, Smart NJ, Fortelny RH (2019) Open versus laparoscopic mesh repair of primary unilateral uncomplicated inguinal hernia: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Hernia 23:461–472
Caro-Tarrago A, Olona C, Millán M, Olona M, Espina B, Jorba R (2019) Long-term results of a prospective randomized trial of midline laparotomy closure with onlay mesh. Hernia 23:335–340
Gavriilidis P, Davies RJ, Wheeler J, de’Angelis N, Di Saverio S (2019) Total extraperitoneal endoscopic hernioplasty (TEP) versus Lichtenstein hernioplasty: a systematic review by updated traditional and cumulative meta-analysis of randomised-controlled trials. Hernia 23:1093–1103
Gutlic N, Gutlic A, Petersson U, Rogmark P, Montgomery A (2019) Randomized clinical trial comparing total extraperitoneal with Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair (TEPLICH trial). Br J Surg 106:845–855
van den Hil LCL, van Steensel S, Schreinemacher MHF, Bouvy ND (2019) Prophylactic mesh placement to avoid incisional hernias after stoma reversal: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia 23:733–741
Kohler A, Lavanchy JL, Lenoir U, Kurmann A, Candinas D, Beldi G (2019) Effectiveness of prophylactic intraperitoneal mesh implantation for prevention of incisional hernia in patients undergoing open abdominal surgery: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 154:109–115
Lockhart K, Dunn D, Teo S, Ng JY, Dhillon M, Teo E, van Driel ML (2018) Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9:CD011517
Obermaier R, Pfeffer F, Hopt UT (Hrsg) (2009) Hernienchirurgie. Elsevier Urban & Fischer, München
Patterson TJ, Beck J, Currie PJ, Spence RAJ, Spence G (2019) Meta-analysis of patient-reported outcomes after laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 106:824–836
Sheen AJ, Montgomery A, Simon T, Ilves I, Paajanen H (2019) Randomized clinical trial of open suture repair versus totally extraperitoneal repair for treatment of sportsman’s hernia. Br J Surg 106:837–844
Shrestha D, Shrestha A, Shrestha B (2019) Open mesh versus suture repair of umbilical hernia: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg 62:62–66
Literatur zu Abschn. 13.6
Berger D (2010) Laparoskopische Reparation der parastomalen Hernie. Chirurg 81:988–992
Jones HG, Rees M, Aboumarzouk OM, Brown J, Cragg J, Billings P, Carter B, Chandran P (2018) Prosthetic mesh placement for the prevention of parastomal herniation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7:CD008905
Reinforcement of Closure of Stoma Site (ROCSS), Collaborative and West Midlands Research Collaborative (2020) Prophylactic biological mesh reinforcement versus standard closure of stoma site (ROCSS): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 395:417–426
Rosch R, Conze J, Junge K, Neumann U (2010) Konventionelle Reparation der parastomalen Hernie. Chirurg 81:982–987
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Otto, J., Lindenau, T., Junge, K. (2021). Hernien. In: Billmann, F., Keck, T. (eds) Facharztwissen Viszeralchirurgie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-61520-1_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-61520-1_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-61519-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-61520-1
eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)