Skip to main content

Trochleoplasty Techniques: Complications

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Patellofemoral Pain, Instability, and Arthritis
  • 1545 Accesses

Abstract

Trochlear dysplasia has been identified as the most consistent anatomic factor in patient with recurrent patellofemoral instability [1]. Trochleoplasty strives to address this anomaly with two main goals: first to reach a stable patellofemoral joint with free range of motion of the knee joint and second to stop or at least decelerate patellofemoral degeneration [1–4].

Disclosure: Consultant Medacta SA (non-related to the article).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dejour D, Le Coultre B. Osteotomies in patello-femoral instabilities. Sports Med Arthrosc. 2007;15(1):39–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bereiter HG. E., Die Trochleaplastik als chirurgische Therapie der rezidivierenden Patellaluxation bei Trochleadysplasie des Femurs. Arthroskopie. 1994;7:281–6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fucentese SF, et al. Classification of trochlear dysplasia as predictor of clinical outcome after trochleoplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19(10):1655–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Song GY, et al. Trochleoplasty versus nontrochleoplasty procedures in treating patellar instability caused by severe trochlear dysplasia. Arthroscopy. 2014;30(4):523–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Albee FH. The bone graft edge in the treatment of habitual dislocation of patella. Med Rec. 1915;88:257–9.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dejour D, Reynaud P, Le Coultre B. Douleurs et instabilité rotulienne. Essai de classification. Méd Hyg. 1998;56:1466–71.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schottle PB, et al. Trochleoplasty for patellar instability due to trochlear dysplasia: a minimum 2-year clinical and radiological follow-up of 19 knees. Acta Orthop. 2005;76(5):693–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Goutallier D, Raou D, Van Driessche S. Retro-trochlear wedge reduction trochleoplasty for the treatment of painful patella syndrome with protruding trochleae. Technical note and early results. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2002;88(7):678–85.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Blond L, Haugegaard M. Combined arthroscopic deepening trochleoplasty and reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament for patients with recurrent patella dislocation and trochlear dysplasia. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(10):2484–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hiemstra LA, et al. Trochleoplasty provides good clinical outcomes and an acceptable complication profile in both short and long-term follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;27:2967–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. van Sambeeck JDP, et al. Trochleoplasty procedures show complication rates similar to other patellar-stabilizing procedures. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26(9):2841–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dejour D, Byn P, Ntagiopoulos PG. The Lyon’s sulcus-deepening trochleoplasty in previous unsuccessful patellofemoral surgery. Int Orthop. 2013;37(3):433–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nelitz M, Dreyhaupt J, Lippacher S. Combined trochleoplasty and medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for recurrent patellar dislocations in severe trochlear dysplasia: a minimum 2-year follow-up study. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(5):1005–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Utting MR, Mulford JS, Eldridge JD. A prospective evaluation of trochleoplasty for the treatment of patellofemoral dislocation and instability. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90(2):180–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. von Knoch F, et al. Trochleoplasty for recurrent patellar dislocation in association with trochlear dysplasia. A 4- to 14-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(10):1331–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nomura E, Horiuchi Y, Kihara M. Medial patellofemoral ligament restraint in lateral patellar translation and reconstruction. Knee. 2000;7(2):121–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Beaufils P, et al. Trochleoplasty in major trochlear dysplasia: current concepts. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol. 2012;4:7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Camathias C, et al. Trochleoplasty as a solitary treatment for recurrent patellar dislocation results in good clinical outcome in adolescents. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(11):2855–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nelitz M, Dreyhaupt J, Williams SRM. No growth disturbance after trochleoplasty for recurrent patellar dislocation in adolescents with open growth plates. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46(13):3209–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pesenti S, et al. The lateral wedge augmentation trochleoplasty in a pediatric population: a 5-year follow-up study. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2017;26(5):458–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. McNamara I, et al. Deepening trochleoplasty with a thick osteochondral flap for patellar instability: clinical and functional outcomes at a mean 6-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(11):2706–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Koch PP, et al. Closing wedge patellar osteotomy in combination with trochleoplasty. Acta Orthop Belg. 2011;77(1):116–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Schottle PB, et al. Cartilage viability after trochleoplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15(2):161–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Metcalfe AJ, et al. Trochleoplasty with a flexible osteochondral flap: results from an 11-year series of 214 cases. Bone Joint J. 2017;99-B(3):344–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Verdonk R, Jansegers E, Stuyts B. Trochleoplasty in dysplastic knee trochlea. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005;13(7):529–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandro F. Fucentese .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 ESSKA

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fucentese, S.F. (2020). Trochleoplasty Techniques: Complications. In: Dejour, D., Zaffagnini, S., Arendt, E., Sillanpää, P., Dirisamer, F. (eds) Patellofemoral Pain, Instability, and Arthritis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-61097-8_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-61097-8_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-61096-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-61097-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics