Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Misgav-Ladach-Sectio („Der sanfte Kaiserschnitt“)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Therapiehandbuch Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

  • 5070 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Jedes operative Verfahren setzt sich aus Hunderten von Bewegungen zusammen. Jede hat eine Herkunft und ihre Geschichte, jede dient einem bestimmten Zweck und sollte einen bestimmten Ausführungsweg haben.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Alamia V, Meyer BA (1999) The development of a scoring system, obstetric parameter that predict successful vaginal delivery after caesarean birth. Obstet Gynecol 93(Suppl):49

    Google Scholar 

  • Grdal M, Tekin A, Erdogan K et al (2002) Endoascopic silicane injection for female stressincontinence. Urology 60(6):1016–1019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lahodny L (Hrsg) (1991) Vaginale Inkontinenz- und Deszensuschirurgie. Enke, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmtag H, Heidler H (2007) Spezielle Urodynamik der Frau. In: Palmtag H, Goepel M, Heidler H (Hrsg) Urodynamik, Kap. 18, 2 Aufl. Springer, Berlin, S 161–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Petri E (2000) Gynäkologische Urologie, 3. Aufl. Thieme, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Petri E (2001) Colsosuspension in treatment of female stress incontinence. Urologe 40(4):292–929

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Down RH, Whitehead R, Watts JM (1980) Why do surgical packs cause peritoneal adhesions? Aust N Z J Surg 50(1):83‒85

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis H (1980) Internaloverhealing: the problem of intraperitoneal adhesions. World J Surg 4:303–306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Federici D, Lacelli B, Muggiasca L, Agarossi A, Cipolla L, Conti M (1997)Cesarean section using the MisgavLadach method. Int J Gynecol Obstet 57(3):273‒279

    Google Scholar 

  • Flamm BL, Goings JR, Liu Y, Wolde-Tsadik G (1994) Elective repeat caesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a prospective multicenter study. Obstet Gynecol 83:927–934

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hauth JC, Owen J, Davis RO (1992) Transverse uterine incision closure: one versus two layers. Am J Obstet Gynecol 167:1108–1111

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hershey DW, Quilligan EJ (1978) Extraabdominal uterine exteriorization at cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol 52(2):189–192

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt J (1961) J.M. Munro Kerr. J ObstetGynaecol Br Emp 68:510‒514

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohlagschwandtner M, Ruecklinger E, Husslein P, Joura EA (2001) Is the formation of a bladder flap at caesarean necessary? A randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 98(6):1089–1092

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hudić I, Fatusić Z, Kamerić L, Misić M, Serak I, Latifagić A (2010) Vaginal delivery after Misgav-Ladachcesarean section – is the risk of uterine rupture acceptable? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 23(10):1156–1159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jelsema RD, Wittingen JA, Vander Kolk KJ (1993) Continuous, nonlocking, single-layer repair of the low transverse uterine incision. J Reprod Med 38(5):393–396

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ et al (2004) Maternal and perinatal outcome associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 25:2581–2589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen B, Davis B (1984) Enhancement of the antibacterial property of amniotic fluid by hyperthermia. Obstet Gynecol 63(3):425–429

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen B, Galask RP (1975) Host resistance to intraamniotic infection. Obstet Gynecol Surv 30(10):675–691

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lasley DS, Eblen A, Yancey MK, Duff P (1997) The effect of placental removal method on the incidence of postcesarean infections. Am J Obstet Gynecol 176(6):1250–1254

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li M, Zou L, Zhu J (2001) Study on modification of the Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section. J Tongji Med Univ 21(1):75–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lindholt JS, Moller-Christensen T, Steele RE (1994) The cosmetic outcome of the scar formation after cesarean section: percutaneous or intracutaneous suture? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 73(10):832–835

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lowenwirt IP, Chi DS, Handwerker SM (1994) Nonfatal venous air embolism during cesarean section: a case report and review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol Surv 49(1):72–76

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McMahon MJ, Luther ER, Bowes WA, Olsham AF (1996) Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second caesarean section. N Engl J Med 335:689–695

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meininger D, Byhahn C, Kessler P et al (2003) Intrathecal fentanyl, sufentanil, or placebo combined with hyperbaric mepivacaine 2% for parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg 96(3):852–858

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moreira P, Moreau JC, Faye ME et al (2002) Comparison of two cesarean techniques: classic versus Misgav Ladach cesarean. J Gynecol Obstet Reprod 31(6):572–576

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mowat J, Bonnar J (1971) Abdominal wound dehiscence after caesarean section. Br Med J 2(756):256–257

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mozurkewich EL, Hutton EL (2000) Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labour: A meta-analysis of the literature from 1989 to 1999. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183(5):1187–1197

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neeser E, Niehues U, Hirsch HA (1988) Maternal morbidity following cesarean section. Comparison of isthmo-corpus longitudinal section and isthmian transverse section in premature labor. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 48(1):8‒12

    Google Scholar 

  • Notzon FC, Cnattingius Bergso P et al (1994) Cesarean section delivery in the 1980s: International comparison by indication. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170:495–504

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Odent M (2009) Wie steht es um die Zukunft einer durch Kaiserschnitt entbundenen Zivilisation. In: Stark M (Hrsg) Der Kaiserschnitt. Urban & Fischer, München, S 396–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson CM, Saunders NJ (1991) Mode of delivery after one caesarean section: audit of current practice in a health region. Br Med J 303:818–821

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pfannenstiel J (1897) Über die Vorteile des suprasymphysärenFaszienquerschnitts für die gynäkologischen Koliotomien, zugleich ein Beitrag zu der Indikationsstellung der Operationswege. Samml Klein Vortr Gynäkol 68‒98 (KlinVortr NF Gynäk 1900; 97:268)

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelan JP, Ahn MO, Diaz F et al (1989) Twice a cesareansection, always a cesarean? Obstet Gynecol 73:161–165

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rageth C, Juzzi C, Grossenbacher H (1999) Delivery after previous caesarean: a risk evaluation. Obstet Gynecol 93:332–337

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology –RCOG (2002) Peritoneal Closure Guideline no. 15, July

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumler-Detzel P (2006) Wunsch-Sectio – aus juristischer Sicht. Gesundheits Recht 5:241–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlund GH (2008) Kommentar zur juristischen Problematik einer Wunschsectio. Gynäkol Praxis 32:237–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Setayesh AR, Kholdebarin AR, Moghadam MS, Setayesh HR (2001) The Trendelenburg position increases the spread and accelerates the onset of epidural anesthesia for Cesarean section. Can J Anaesth 48(9):890–893

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stark M (1993) Clinical evidence that suturing the peritoneum after laparotomy is unnecessary for healing. World J Surg 17(3):419

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stark M (1994) Technique of caesarean section: MisgavLadach method. In: Popkin DR, Peddle LJ (Hrsg) Women’s Health Today. Perspectives on current research and clinical practice. Proceedings of the XIV. World Congress of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Montreal. Parthenon, New York, S. 81‒85

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark M (2009) In the era of ‚non-closure of the peritoneum‘, how to open it? (Not every simple method is optimal, but every optimal method is simple). Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 88(1):119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stark M, Finkel AR (1994) Comparison between the Joel-Cohen and Pfannestiel incision in caesarean sections. Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol 53:121–122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stark M, Chavkin Y, Kupfersztain C, Guedj P, Finkel AR (1995) Evaluation of combinations of procedures in cesarean section. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 48(3):273–276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wahab MA, Karantzis P, Eccersley PS, Russell IF, Thompson JW (1999) A randomised, controlled study of uterine exteriorisation and repair at caesarean section. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 106(9):913‒916

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein D, Benshushan A, Tano V, Zilberstein R, Rojanski N (1996) Predictive score for vaginal birth after cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 174:192–198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson C, Enkin MW (2000) Manual removal of placenta at caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD000130

    Google Scholar 

Neue Literatur

  • Belci D, Di Renzo GC, Stark M, Đurić J, Zoričić D, Belci M, Peteh LL (2015) Better outcome regarding the intensity of pain, presence of neuropathic and chronic pain and the level of satisfaction about cosmetic appearance of the scar (Morbidity and chronic pain following different techniques of caesarean section: a comparative study. J Obstet Gynaecol 35(5):442–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennich G, Rudnicki M, Wilken-Jensen C, Lousen T, Lassen PD, Wøjdemann K (2016) Impact of adding a second layer to a single unlocked closure of a cesarean uterine incision: randomized controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 47(4):417–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.15792

  • Husslein P, Wertaschnigg D (2002) Elective cesarean section–delivery mode of the future or social misconception? Therapie Umsch 59(12):660–666

    Google Scholar 

  • es10.5152/jtgga.2016.16131. eCollection 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Berhan Y, Berhan A (2014) A meta-analysis of reverse breech extraction to deliver a deeply impacted head during cesarean delivery. Int J Gynecol Obstet 124:99–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landesman R, Graber EA (1984) Abdominovaginal delivery: modification of the cesarean section operation to facilitate delivery of the impacted head. Am J Obstet Gynecol 148:707–710

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann R (2015) Schwierige Kindesentwicklung bei der Sectio. Der Gynäkologe 48:599–610

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann R (2012) Handbuch Geburtshilfe. Eigenverlag, Zürich

    Google Scholar 

Weiterführende Literatur

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The New European Surgical Academy (NESA), Berlin, Deutschland

    Michael Stark

  2. Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Fürst Stirum Klinik Bruchsal, Bruchsal, Deutschland

    Jürgen Wacker

Authors
  1. Michael Stark
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jürgen Wacker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Stark .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Fürst-Stirum-Klinik Bruchsal Frauenklinik, Bruchsal, Germany

    Jürgen Wacker

  2. Praxisklinik am Rosengarten, Mannheim, Germany

    Martin Sillem

  3. Praxisklinik am Rosengarten, Mannheim, Germany

    Gunther Bastert

  4. Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen-Nürnberg Frauenklinik, Erlangen, Germany

    Matthias W. Beckmann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Stark, M., Wacker, J. (2020). Misgav-Ladach-Sectio („Der sanfte Kaiserschnitt“). In: Wacker, J., Sillem, M., Bastert, G., Beckmann, M. (eds) Therapiehandbuch Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-59809-2_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-59809-2_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-59808-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-59809-2

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation