Advertisement

Bare Nouns and the Hungarian Mass/Count Distinction

  • Kurt ErbachEmail author
  • Peter R. Sutton
  • Hana Filip
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11456)

Abstract

We argue that in Hungarian notionally count, singular nouns like könyv (‘book’), toll (‘pen’), and ház (‘house’) are semantically number-neutral (see also Farkas and de Swart (2010)). This departs from the view that such nouns are dual-life with respect to being count or mass, such as brick or stone in English, as recently argued by Rothstein (2017) and Schvarcz and Rothstein (2017), who rely on two assumptions: that pseudo-partitive (measure) NPs require mass predicates denoting measured entities (Rothstein 2011); and that classifiers modify mass nouns (Chierchia 1998, 2010). We provide evidence against these two assumptions and argue that, together with (i) the commonly accepted analysis of measure DPs on which they require cumulative predicates to denote what is measured (i.a, Krifka 1989; Filip 1992, 2005; Nakanishi 2003; Schwarzschild 2006; and (ii) for an analysis of classifiers (Krifka 1995; Sudo 2017) in which they combine with numerical expressions rather than nouns, a number neutral analysis of Hungarian notionally count, singular nouns covers a wider range of data than a dual-life analysis does. We build on the use of context to specify what counts as one (Landman 2011; Rothstein 2010; Sutton and Filip 2016) and the analyses of counting and measuring in Filip and Sutton (2017) yielding a novel analysis in which Hungarian has many count nouns and many mass nouns, rather than many dual-life and mass nouns, but few count nouns.

Keywords

Count/mass Number-neutral Classifiers Context-sensitivity 

References

  1. Allan, K.: Nouns and countability. Language 56, 541–567 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bale, A., Barner, D.: Semantic triggers, linguistic variation and the mass-count distinction. In: Count and Mass Across Languages, pp. 238–260. Oxford University Press (2012)Google Scholar
  3. Bale, A., Coon, J.: Classifiers are for numerals, not for nouns: consequences for the mass/count distinction. Linguist. Inq. 45, 695–707 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chierchia, G.: Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of “semantic parameter”. In: Rothstein, S. (ed.) Events and Grammar: Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol. 7, pp. 53–103. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chierchia, G.: Mass nouns, vagueness and semantic variation. Synthese 174(1), 99–149 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Csirmaz, A., Dékány, É.: Hungarian is a classifier language. In: Simone, R., Masini, F. (eds.) Word Classes: Nature, Typology and Representations, pp. 141–160. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam (2014)Google Scholar
  7. Dékány, É.: A profile of the Hungarian DP. Ph.D. thesis. Center for Advanced Study in Theoretical Linguistics, University of Tromsø (2011)Google Scholar
  8. Erbach, K., Sutton, P., Filip, H., Byrdeck, K.: Object mass nouns in Japanese. In: Cremers, A., van Gessel, T., Roelofsen, F., (eds.) Proceedings of the 21st Amsterdam Colloquium, pp. 235–244. Institute for Logic, Language, and Computation at the University of Amsterdam (2017)Google Scholar
  9. Farkas, D., De Swart, H.: The Semantics of Incorporation. Stanford Monographs in Linguistics. CSLI Publications, Stanford (2003)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Farkas, D., de Swart, H.: The semantics and pragmatics of plurals. Semant. Pragmat. 3, 1–54 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Filip, H.: Aspect and interpretation of nominal arguments. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 139–158. University of Chicago, Chicago (1992)Google Scholar
  12. Filip, H.: Measures and indefinites. Reference and quantification: the Partee effect, pp. 229–289 (2005)Google Scholar
  13. Filip, H., Sutton, P.: Singular count NPs in measure constructions. Semant. Linguist. Theory 27, 340–357 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gyarmathy, Z.: Technical report on the count/mass distinction in hungarian from the perspective of rothstein’s theory. Heinrich Heine University (2016)Google Scholar
  15. Krifka, M.: Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics. In: Bartsch, R., van Benthem, J.F.A.K., van Emde Boas, P. (eds.) Semantics and Contextual Expression, pp. 75–115. Foris Publications, Dordrecht (1989)Google Scholar
  16. Krifka, M.: Common nouns: a contrastive analysis of English and Chinese. In: Carlson, G., Pelletier, F.J. (eds.) The Generic Book, pp. 398–411. Chicago University Press, Chicago (1995)Google Scholar
  17. Landman, F.: Count nouns-mass nouns, neat nouns-mess nouns. Balt. Int. Yearb. Cogn. Log. Commun. 6(1), 12 (2011)Google Scholar
  18. Landman, F.: Iceberg semantics for count nouns and mass nouns: the evidence from portions. Baltic Int. Yearbook Cogn. Logic Commun. 11(1), 6 (2016)Google Scholar
  19. Nakanishi, K.: The semantics of measure phrases. In: Proceedings-NELS, vol. 33, pp. 225–244 (2003)Google Scholar
  20. Pires de Oliveira, R., Rothstein, S.: Bare singular noun phrases are mass in Brazilian Portugese. Lingua 121, 2153–2175 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rothstein, S.: Counting and the mass/count distinction. J. Semant. 27(3), 343–397 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rothstein, S.: Counting, measuring and the semantics of classifiers. Balt. Int. Yearb. Cogn. Log. Commun. 6(1), 15 (2011)Google Scholar
  23. Rothstein, S.: Semantics for Counting and Measuring. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schvarcz, B.R., Rothstein, S.: Hungarian classifier constructions, plurality and the mass-count distinction. In: Approaches to Hungarian, Papers from the 2015 Leiden Conference, vol. 15, pp. 183. John Benjamins Publishing Company (2017)Google Scholar
  25. Schwarzschild, R.: The role of dimensions in the syntax of noun phrases. Syntax 9(1), 67–110 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Soja, N.N., Carey, S., Spelke, E.S.: Ontological categories guide young children’s inductions of word meaning: object terms and substance terms. Cognition 38(2), 179–211 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sudo, Y.: The semantic role of classifiers in japanese. Balt. Int. Yearb. Cogn. Log. Commun. 11(1), 10 (2016)Google Scholar
  28. Sudo, Y.: Countable nouns in Japanese. Proc. WAFL 11(1), 11 (2017)Google Scholar
  29. Sutton, P., Filip, H.: Counting in context: count/mass variation and restrictions on coercion in collective artifact nouns. Semant. Linguist. Theory 26, 350–370 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sutton, P.R., Filip, H.: Restrictions on subkind coercion in object mass nouns. In: Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, vol. 21 (2017, to appear)Google Scholar
  31. Zucchi, S., White, M.: Twigs, sequences and the temporal constitution of predicates. In: Proceedings of SALT, vol. 6 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Heinrich Heine UniversitätDüsseldorfGermany

Personalised recommendations