Skip to main content

The Leasing Case—Contract Impact on Accounting and Financing Objectives

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Contractual Management
  • 746 Accesses

Abstract

The present case study looks at the importance of the CM Model against the background of a bilateral treatment of leasing and rental contracts in combination with so-called covenant agreements that usually and most often constitute a part of company financing. It illustrates the importance of a comprehensive knowledge of the effects of contracts on the areas of accounting and financing and demonstrates the contract’s considerable controlling effects on the overall decision-making process in terms of the CM Model. The case study further highlights which organizational rules are important in order to obtain this knowledge and, based on this knowledge, how to make the best decisions on the management level while taking the company objectives under consideration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bundesfinanzministerium. (1971). Ertragsteuerliche Behandlung von Leasing-Verträgen über bewegliche Wirtschaftsgüter. 19. April 1971, BStBl. I; BMF IV B/2-S 2170-31/71, p. 264.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dilßner, M., & Müller, S. (2017). Leasingbilanzierung auf dem Prüfstand—IAS 17 und IFRS 16 im Vergleich zum handels- und steuerrechtlichen Konzept der Teilamortisation. BC 5/2017, pp. 220–225.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Deloitte. (2019). Leases: Key differences between U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. https://www.iasplus.com/en-us/standards/ifrs-usgaap/leases. Accessed 17 March 2019.

  4. European Commission. (2003). COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1725/2003 of 29 September 2003 adopting certain international accounting standards in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Financial Accounting Standards Board. (2019). Leases. https://www.fasb.org/leases. Accessed 5 April 2019.

  6. Ziegler, S., & Blab, D. (2019a). Die neue Leasingbilanzierung nach IFRS und US-GAAP. War das Konvergenzprojekt von IASB und FASB erfolgreich? KoR IFRS,4, 172–182.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ziegler, S., & Blab, D. (2019b). To show or not to show. IRZ 2019, 1/2019, pp. 29 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus Ulrich .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendices

1.1 Comparison of Leasing Concepts

Table 9.1 Comparison of leasing concepts HGB/IAS 17/IFRS 16—definition of leasing

1.2 Differences IFRS and US-GAAP on ‘Leases’

Table 9.2 Differences IFRS and US-GAAP (US GAAP (ASU 2016-02 ‘Leases’; ASC topic 842)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ulrich, M. (2020). The Leasing Case—Contract Impact on Accounting and Financing Objectives. In: Schuhmann, R., Eichhorn, B. (eds) Contractual Management. Springer Vieweg, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58482-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics