Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Einführung

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
PNF in der Praxis

  • 3230 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Kapitel wird das PNF-Konzept innerhalb der aktuellen holistischen Behandlungsdenkarten positioniert und mit Befunden und Möglichkeiten der Behandlung kombiniert. Die klinischen Entscheidungen im Verlauf einer Behandlung werden zum einen durch die Erfahrung des Therapeuten, einen sorgfältigen Patientenbefund mit dazugehörender Klinimetrie (Messungen) bestimmt; zum anderen spielen für das Erstellen der Behandlungsziele wissenschaftliche Kenntnisse, z. B. über das motorische Lernen und die motorische Kontrolle, eine wichtige Rolle. Aus den Untersuchungsergebnissen wird eine Behandlung nach Kriterien der evidenzbasierten Praxis (»evidence based practice«) abgeleitet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Bernstein N (1967) The coordination and regulation of movement. Pergamon, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks VB (1986) The neural basis of motor control. Oxford University Press, New York/Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Cott CA (2004) Client-centered rehabilitation: client perspectives. Disabil Rehabil 26(24):1411–1422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damasio A (1999) The feeling of what happens. Harcourt Brace & Co, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitts PM, Posner MI (1967) Human performance. Brooks/Cole, Belmont

    Google Scholar 

  • Harste U, Handrock A (2008) Das Patientengespräch. Buchner & Partner, Schwentinental

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedin-Anden S (2002) PNF-Grundverfahren und funktionelles Training. Urban & Fischer, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Horst R (2005) Motorisches Strategietraining und PNF. Thieme, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Horst R (2008) Therapiekonzepte in der Physiotherapie: PNF. Thieme, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • IPNFA (2005) Results of the Meeting. Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • IPNFA (2006) Results of the Meeting. Ljubljana

    Google Scholar 

  • IPNFA (2007) International PNF Association. http://www.ipnfa.org. Zugegriffen: 12.2009

  • IPNFA (2007) http://wwww.ipnfa.jp. Zugegriffen: 12.2009

  • IPNFA (2007) http://www.pnf.or.kr. Zugegriffen: 12.2009

  • IPNFA (2007) http://www.ipnfa.de. Zugegriffen: 12.2009

  • IPNFA (2008) Results of the Meeting Hoensbroek

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabat H (1950) Studies on neuromuscular dysfunction, XIII: New concepts and techniques of neuromuscular reeducation for paralysis. Perm Found Med Bull 8(3):121–143

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knott M, Voss D (1956) Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation. Hoeber-Harper, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers JB, Lephart SM (2003) The role of the sensimotor system in the athletic shoulder. J Athl Train 3:351–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulder T (1991) A process-oriented model of human motor behaviour: toward a theory-based rehabilitation approach. Phys Ther 2:82–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulder T (2006) Das adaptive Gehirn. Thieme, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulder T, Hochstenbach J (2004) Motor control and learning: Implications for neurological rehabilitation. In: Greenwood (Hrsg) Handbook for neurological rehabilitation. Erlbaum, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Oosterhuis-Geers J (2004) SMART, google.nl. Universität Twente

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacket DL, Rosenberg WMC, Gray JAM, Haynes RB, Richardson WS (1996) Evidenced based medicine: what is it and what isn’t? BMJ 312:71–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacket DL, Straus SE, Richardson WS et al (2000) Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM, 2. Aufl. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett DL (1998) Getting research findings into practice. BMJ 317:339–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scager M (2004) SMART, google.nl. Hogeschool van Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt RA, Wrisberg CA (2004) Motor learning and performance, a problem based learning approach, 3. Aufl. Human Kinetics, Leeds

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherrington C (1947) The integrated action of the nervous system. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Shumway-Cook AW, Woollacott M (1995) Motor control: theory and practical applications. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Smedes F (2006) Is there support for the PNF Concept? A literature search on electronically databases. www.ipnfa.org. Zugegriffen: 12.2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppé B (2007) FBL Klein-Vogelbach Functional Kinetics: Die Grundlagen. Bewegungsanalyse, Untersuchung, Behandlung. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Umphred D (2001) Neurological rehabilitation, 4. Aufl. Mosby, Missouri

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss DE, Ionta M, Meyers B (1985) Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation: patterns and techniques, 3. Aufl. Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO (1997) ICIDH-2-The international classification of impairments, activities and participation: A manual of dimensions of disablement and functioning (Beta-1 draft for field trials). World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2007) International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). www.who.int/classifications/icf/. Zugegriffen: 12.2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Winstein CJ (1991) Knowledge of results and motor learning: Implications for physical therapy. Phys Ther 71:140–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Weiterführende Literatur – Treating the total human being

  • Clark NC, Treleaven J, Röijezon U (2015) Proprioception in musculoskeletal rehabilitation. Part 2 Basic science and principles of assessment and clinical Interventions. Manuel Ther 20(3):378–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Röijezon U, Clark NC, Treleaven J (2015) Proprioception in musculoskeletal rehabilitation. Part 1 Basic science and principles of assessment and clinical interventions. Manuel Ther 20(3):368–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smedes F (2001) PNF beter (be)grijpen. FysioPraxis 2001(12):42–46 (Better understanding of PNF)

    Google Scholar 

  • Smedes F (2002) Functioneel oefenen, de betekenis van het functioneel oefenen binnen het PNF concept. FysioPraxis 11(11):9–11 (functional exercise, the meaning for PNF)

    Google Scholar 

  • Smedes F, Heidmann M, Schäfer C, Fischer N, Stepien A (2016) The proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation-concept; the state of the evidence, a narrative review. Phys Ther Rev 21(1):17–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10833196.1216764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westwater-Wood S, Adams N, Kerry R (2010) The use of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation in physiotherapy practice. Phys Ther Rev 15(1):23–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

Weiterführende Literatur – Use of motor learning and motor control principles

  • Bach-y-Rita P, Balliet R (1987) Recovery from stroke. In: Duncan PW, Badke MB (Hrsg) Stroke rehabilitation: the recovery of motor control. Year book medical publishers, S 79–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Cauraugh JH, Kim SB (2003) Stroke motor recovery: active neuromuscular stimulation and repetitive practice schedules. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 74:1562–1566

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Celnik P, Stefan K et al (2006) Encoding a motor memory in the older adult by action observation. Neuroimage 29:677–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlton JL (1994) Motor control issues and clinical applications. Physiother Theory Pract 10:185–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corcos DM (1991) Strategies underlying the control of disordered movement. Phys Ther 71:25–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ertelt D et al (2007) Action observation has a positive impact on rehabiltation of motor deficits after stroke. Neuroimage 36(Suppl 2):164–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filimon F, Nelson JD, Hagler DJ, Sereno MI (2007) Human cortical representations for reaching: mirror neurons for execution, observation, and imagery. Neuroimage 37(4):1315–1328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitts PM, Posner MI (1967) Human performance. Brooks-Cole, Belmont

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank JS, Earl M (1990) Coördination of posture and movement. Phys Ther 12:109–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey SH, Fogassi L, Grafton S, Picard N, Rothwell JC, Schweighofer N, Corbetta M, Fitzpatrick SM (2011) Neurological principles and rehabilitation of action disorders: computation, anatomy, and physiology (CAP) model. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 25:6–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grafton ST, Salidis J, Willingham DB (2001) Motor learning of compatible and incompatible visuomotor maps. J Cogn Neurosci 13(2):217–231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grezes J, Decety J (2001) Functional anatomy and execution, mental stimulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: a meta-analysis. Hum Brain Mapp 12(1):1–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Halsband U, Lange RK (2006) Motor learning in man: A review of functional and clinical studies. J Physiol 99:414–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecht H, Prinz W, Vogt S (2001) Motor Learning enhances perceptual judgment. a case for action-perception transfer. Psychol Res 65:3–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krakauer JW (2006) Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol 19:84–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latash ML, Levin MF, Scholz JP, Schöner G (2010) Motor control theories and their applications. Medicina (Kaunas) 46(6):382–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee TD, Swanson LR, Hall AL (1991) What is repeated in a repetition? Effects of practice conditions on motor skill acquisition. Phys Ther 71:150–156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luft CDB (2014) Learning from FB. The neural mechanisms of fb processing facilitating beter performance. Behav Brain Res 261:356–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malouin F, Jackson PL, Richards CL (2013) Towards the integration of mental practice in rehab programs. a critical review. Front Hum Neurosci 9:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks R (1997) Peripheral mechanisms underlying the signaling of joint position. Nz J Physiother 25:7–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulder T (1991) A process-orientated model of human motor behaviour: toward a theoty-based rehabilitation approach. Phys Ther 2:82–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell KM, Vaillancourt DE (2001) Dimensional change in motor learning. Hum Mov Sci 20:695–715

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rokni U et al (2007) Motor Learning with Unstable Neural Representations. Neuron 54:653–666

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roy S, Park NW (2010) Dissociation the memory systems mediating complex tool knowlege and skill. Neuropsychologica 48

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanes JN, Donoghue JP (2000) Plasticity and primary motor cortex. annu Rev Neurosci 23:393–415

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Lee T (2011) Motor Control ans Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis, 5. Aufl. Human Kinetics, ition (see PNF text book)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shumway-Cook and Woollacott, 2012, see PNF text books

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley J, Krakauer JW (2013) Motor skill depends on knowledge of facts. Front Hum Neurosci 8:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Stefan K, Classen J, Celnik P, Cohen LG (2008) Concurrent action observation modulates practice-induces motor memory formation. Eur J Neurosci 27:730–738

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taub E et al (1994) An operant approach to rehab medicine, overcoming learned nonuse by shaping. J Exp Analysis Behav 61(2):281–293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor JA, Ivry RB (2012) The role of strategies in motor learning. ann Ny Acad Sci. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.06430.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thaut MH et al (2007) Rhytmic auditory stimulation improves gait more than NDT/Bobath Training in near-ambulatory patients early poststroke: a single-blind , randomized trial, Neurorehabil Neural Reair 21(5):455–459

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vereijken B, Whiting HTA, Newell KM (1992) Free(z)ing degrees of freedom in skill acquisition. J Mot Behav 24(1):133–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vereijken B, Van Emmerik REA, Bongaardt R, Beek WJ, Newell KM (1997) Changing coordinative structures in complex skill Acquisition. Hum Mov Sci 16(6):823–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Vliet PM, Wulf G (2006) Extrinsic feedback for motor learning after stroke what is the evidence. Disabil Rehabil 28(13–14):831–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitall J et al (2000) Bilateral arm training with rytmic auditory cueing improves motor function in chronic hemiparetic stroke. Stroke 31:2390–2395

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Winstein CJ (1991) Knowledge of results and motor learning – Implications for physical therapy. Phys Ther 71(2):140–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wittwer JE et al (2013) Rhytmic auditory cueing to improve walking in patients with neurological conditions other than Parkinson’s disease—what is the evidence? DisabilRehabil 35(2):164–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulf G, Lewthwaite R (2016) Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: the OPTIMAL theory of motor learning. Psychon Bull Rev 23:1382–1414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wulf G, Höss M, Prinz W (1998) Instructions for motor learning differential effect for internal versus external focus of attention. J Mot Behav 30(2):169–179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wulf G, Shea C, Lewthwaite R (2010) Motor learning and performance: a review of influential factors. Med Educ 44:75–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwicker JG, Harris SR (2009) A reflection on motor learning theory in pediatric occupational therapy practice. Can J Occup Ther 76(1):29–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

Weiterführende Literatur – Summation

  • Mahoney JR, Li CPC, Park MO, Verghese J, Holtzer R (2011) Multisensory integration across the senses in young and old adults. Brain Research 1426:43–53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silva et al (2013) Verbal and visual stimulation effects on rectus femoris and biceps femoris muscles during isometric and concentric. Int Arch Med 6:38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Da Silva LG, Lummertz CA, Lopes Pedralli M, Rigon F (2011) Visual and verh summation enhance muscle output in young female subjects. Cep Ulbra 436H:

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbenjaphol P, Jitpanya C, Khaoropthum S (2009) Effects of the sensory stimulation program on recovery in unconscious patients with traumatic brain injury. J Neurosci Nurs 41(3):10–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Beek, Niederlande

    Math Buck

Authors
  1. Math Buck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Math Buck .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Buck, M. (2019). Einführung. In: PNF in der Praxis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58403-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58403-3_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-58402-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-58403-3

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation