Skip to main content

A Practical Guide to Writing (and Understanding) a Scientific Paper: Clinical Studies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Basic Methods Handbook for Clinical Orthopaedic Research

Abstract

Writing a scientific paper is a relevant part of the activities of medical doctors and is increasingly important for the progress of medical knowledge. Clinical outcomes can only be improved through research, education, and patient care. All these experiences are shared with the global community, primarily through peer-reviewed research papers, systematic review articles, and meta-analyses. Considering that not that much time is spent on training medical students to write a research manuscript, it, however, appears to be an intimidating process for many medical doctors.

The aim of this paper is to provide tips acquired from authors attempting to help to write good-quality clinical papers without wasting their time and how to publish them in the appropriate journals. We have selected specific topics, which are analyzed in dedicated paragraphs. The different selections are how to choose the topic, find the current literature, analyze the data, structure the paper, write the paper, and handle references and some final tips on how to manage the submission process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Altman DG, Simera I, Hoey J, Moher D, Schulz K. EQUATOR: reporting guidelines for health research. Lancet. 2008;371(9619):1149–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Annesley TM. The discussion section: your closing argument. Clin Chem. 2010;56(11):1671–4. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2010.155358.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Andrade C. How to write a good abstract for a scientific paper or conference presentation. Indian J Psychiatry. 2011;53(2):172–5. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5545.82558.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Barron JP. The uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals recommended by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Chest. 2006;129(4):1098–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Burns PB, Rohrich RJ, Chung KC. The levels of evidence and their role in evidence-based medicine. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(1):305–10. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318219c171.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. http://www.cochranelibrary.com.

  7. http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/manuscript-preparation/preparing-for-submission.html.

  8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/.

  9. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cochrane_Library.

  10. http://www.who.int/library/country/regional/en/.

  11. Kallestinova ED. How to write your first research paper. Yale J Biol Med. 2011;84(3):181–90.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Liumbruno GM, Velati C, Pasqualetti P, Franchini M. How to write a scientific manuscript for publication. Blood Transfus. 2013;11(2):217–26.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Levin KA. Study design IV. Cohort studies. Evid Based Dent. 2006;7(2):51–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Moher D, Pham B, Jones A, et al. Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? Lancet. 1998;352(9128):609–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nahata MC. Tips for writing and publishing an article. Ann Pharmacother. 2008;42(2):273–7. https://doi.org/10.1345/aph.1K616.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. O’Connor TR, Holmquist GP. Algorithm for writing a scientific manuscript. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2009;37(6):344–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Randelli PS, et al. Needs and wishes from the arthroscopy community. In: Karahan M, Kerkhoffs G, Randelli P, Tuijthof G, editors. Effective training of arthroscopic skills. Berlin: Springer; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shah J, Shah A, Pietrobon R. Scientific writing of novice researchers: what difficulties and encouragements do they encounter? Acad Med. 2009;84(4):511–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31819a8c3c.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sharma S. How to become a competent medical writer? Perspect Clin Res. 2010;1(1):33–7. PubMed PMID: 21829780.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Schulz KF, Grimes DA. Generation of allocation sequences in randomised trials: chance, not choice. Lancet. 2002;359:515–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tuijthof G, Cabitza F, Ragone V, Compagnoni R, Dutch Arthrocopy Society Teaching Committee, Randelli P. What arthroscopic skills need to be trained before continuing safe training in the operating room? J Knee Surg. 2017;30(7):718–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Vickers AJ. How to randomize. J Soc Integr Oncol. 2006;4(4):194–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Whitlock EP, Lopez SA, Chang S, et al. Identifying, selecting, and refining topics. In: Methods guide for effectiveness and comparative effectiveness reviews [Internet]. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zeiger M. Essentials of writing biomedical research papers. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2000. p. 176–219.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 ISAKOS

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Compagnoni, R. et al. (2019). A Practical Guide to Writing (and Understanding) a Scientific Paper: Clinical Studies. In: Musahl, V., et al. Basic Methods Handbook for Clinical Orthopaedic Research. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58254-1_48

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58254-1_48

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-58253-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-58254-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics