Zusammenfassung
Rehabilitationsmaßnahmen bei PatientInnen sollten in allen Phasen der Erkrankung, auch im fortgeschrittenen Stadium, zur Anwendung kommen, um die Lebensqualität und die Funktionsfähigkeit betroffener Menschen bestmöglich zu erhalten und zu verbessern. Personalisierte und individuelle Assessments und Therapiemittel sind in der Onkologischen Rehabilitation im Bereich von Teilhabe und Arbeitsfähigkeit essenziell. Multiprofessionelle bzw. interdisziplinäre Zusammenarbeit ist erforderlich, um gemeinsam die Ziele im Rahmen einer Rehabilitation erreichen zu können. Die ICF der Weltgesundheitsorganisation eignet sich zur umfassenden Beschreibung von Teilhabe und Arbeitsfähigkeit sowie als gemeinsame Sprache eines multiprofessionellen bzw. interdisziplinären Teams.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Literatur
Arends J, Bachmann P, Baracos V et al (2017) ESPEN guidelines on nutrition in cancer patients. Clin Nutr 36(1):11–48
Brandt Å, Pilegaard MS, Østergaard LG et al (2016) Effectiveness of the „Cancer Home-Life Intervention“ on everyday activities and quality of life in people with advanced cancer living at home: a randomised controlled trial and an economic evaluation. BMC Palliat Care 15(1):10
Coenen M, Cieza A, Stamm TA, Amann E, Kollerits B, Stucki G (2006) Validation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core set for rheumatoid arthritis from the patient perspective using focus groups. Arthritis ResTher 8(4):R84
Coenen M, Stamm TA, Stucki G, Cieza A (2012) Individual interviews and focus groups in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison of two qualitative methods. Qual Life Res 21(2):359–370
Egan MY, McEwen S, Sikora L, Chasen M, Fitch M, Eldred S (2013) Rehabilitation following cancer treatment. Disabil Rehabil 35(26):2245–2258
Gäbler GJ, Coenen M, Bolleurs C et al (2018) Toward harmonization of the nutrition care process terminology and the international classification of functioning, disability and health− dietetics: results of a mapping exercise and implications for nutrition and dietetics practice and research. J Acad NutrDiet 118(1):13–20.e13
Holm LV, Hansen DG, Johansen C (2012) Participation in cancer rehabilitation and unmet needs: a population-based cohort study. Support Care Cancer 20(11):2913–2924
ICF (2001) ICF – international classification of functioning, disability and health. World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/. Zugegriffen am 26.11.2018
Law M, Baptiste S, McColl M, Opzoomer (Carswell) A, Polatajko H, Pollock N (1990) The Canadian occupational performance measure: an outcome measure for occupational therapy. Can J Occup Ther 57(2):82–87
Lozano-Lozano M, Martín-Martín L, Galiano-Castillo N et al (2016) Integral strategy to supportive care in breast cancer survivors through occupational therapy and a m-health system: design of a randomized clinical trial. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 16(1):150
McQuellon RP, Danhauer SC (2007) Psychosocial rehabilitation in cancer care. In: Ganz PA (Hrsg) Cancer survivorship. Springer, New York
Ng CL, Ho DD, Chow SP (1999) The Moberg pickup test: results of testing with a standard protocol. J Hand Ther 12(4):309–312
Reilly MC, Zbrozek AS, Dukes EM (1993) The validity and reproducibility of a work productivity and activity impairment instrument. Pharmacoeconomics 4(5):353–365
Silver JK, Gilchrist LS (2011) Cancer rehabilitation with a focus on evidence-based outpatient physical and occupational therapy interventions. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 90(5):5–15
Stamm TA (2007) Occupational balance in people with rheumatoid arthritis. University of Brighton, Brighton
Stamm TA, Ploner A, Machold KP, Smolen JS (2003) Moberg picking-up test in patients with inflammatory joint diseases: a survey of suitability in comparison to button test and measures of disease activity. Arthritis Rheum 49(5):626–632
Stamm TA, Cieza A, Machold KP, Smolen JS, Stucki G (2004) Content comparison of occupation-based instruments in adult rheumatology and musculoskeletal rehabilitation based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Arthritis Rheum 51(6):917–924
Stamm TA, Cieza A, Coenen M et al (2005) Validating the international classification of functioning, disability and health comprehensive core set for rheumatoid arthritis from the patient perspective: a qualitative study. Arthritis Rheum 53(3):431–439
Stamm TA, Machold KP, Smolen J, Prodinger B (2010) Life stories of people with rheumatoid arthritis who retired early: how gender and other contextual factors shaped their everyday activities, including paid work. Musculoskeletal Care 8(2):78–86
Stucki G, Grimby G (2004) Applying the ICF in medicine. J Rehabil Med 44(Suppl):5–6
Vockins H (2004) Occupational therapy intervention with patients with breast cancer: a survey. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 13(1):45–52
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stamm, T. et al. (2020). Onkologische Rehabilitation – Mittel zur Teilhabe und Arbeitsfähigkeit: die Internationale Funktionsklassifikation der Weltgesundheitsorganisation, sowie die Wichtigkeit von bedeutungsvoller Aktivität und interdisziplinärer Zusammenarbeit. In: Crevenna, R. (eds) Onkologische Rehabilitation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-57982-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-57982-4_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-57981-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-57982-4
eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)