Abstract
With this paper, we will illustrate the synergetic potential of interdisciplinary research by demonstrating how socio-scientific perspectives can serve engineering purposes and contribute to engineering assignments. This especially concerns eliciting knowledge models and ergonomically optimizing technological design. For this purpose, we report on our findings on socio-technical arrangements within smart factory research initiatives that are part of the IMPROVE project. We focus our findings on the systemic interplay between the formally modelled plant, its actual physical state and the social environment. We also look at how operators, as parts of the plant’s environment, adapt themselves and thereby develop their own particular work culture. We then integrate these findings by reconstructing this operator work culture as a specific way of performing, accounting for and addressing particular issues. We enhance these findings using the lenses of recent concepts developed in the field of social theory, namely the praxeological understanding of tacit knowledge, systems theory differentiations and an actor-network-theory understanding of human-machine agency. Applying these concepts from social theory, we revisit our empirical findings and integrate them to provide context-sensitive, socioscientifically informed suggestions for engineering research on knowledge models concerning HMI design.
Keywords
- Socio-technical Arrangements
- smart industry
- HMI design
Download chapter PDF
References
Hoc, J.-M.: From human - machine interaction to human – machine cooperation. In: Ergonomics (7) 43, pp. 833-843. Taylor and Francis, London (2010).
Hollnagel, E., Amalberti, R.: The Emperor’s New Clothes. Or Whatever Happened To “Human Error”. HESSD (2001).
Glaser, B. G.: Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. Sociology Press, Mill Valley/California (1978).
Clifford, J., Marcus, G. E. (eds): Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. 25th Anniversary Edition. University of California Press, Berkeley, Calif. (2010).
Law, J.: Theories and methods in the sociology of science: an interpretative approach. In: Social Science Information 13, pp. 163–172, Sage, London (1974).
Strauss, A. I., Corbin, J. M.: Basic of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 2nd Edition. Sage Publicatoins, Thousand Oaks/California (1998).
Charmaz, K.: Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage, London (2006).
Müller, P., Passoth, J.-H.: Engineering Collaborative Social Science Toolkits. STS Methods and Concepts as Devices for Interdisciplinary Diplomacy. In: Karafillidis, A., Weidner, R.: Developing Support Technologies. Springer International, Cham (2018, forthcoming) Interdisciplinary Diplomacy. Forthcoming.
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L.: The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine, Chicago (1967).
Suchman, L., Blomberg, J. Orr, J., Trigg, R.: Reconstructing Technologies as Social Pracitce. In: American Behavioral Scientit (3) 43, pp. 392-408. Sage, London (1999).
Suchman, L., Trigg, R., Blomberg, J.: Working artefacts: ethnomethods of the prototype. In: British Journal of Sociology (2) 53, pp. 163-179, Routledge, London (2002).
Paetau: https://papiro.unizar.es/ojs/index.php/rc51-jos/article/view/790
Maturana, H., Francisco, V.: Autopoiesis and Cognition: the Realization of the Living. In: Cohen, R. S., Wartofsky, M. W. (eds) Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science (42). D. Reidel, Dordrecht (1980).
Luhmann, N.: Essays on Self-Reference. Columbia University Press, New York (1990).
Bravo-Vásquez, D.-M., Sánchez-Segura, M.-I., Fuensanta, M.-D., Antonio, A.: Combining Software Engineering Elicitation Technique with the Knowledge Management Lifecycle. In: International Journal of Knowledge Society Research. 3 (1), pp. 1-13. IGI Global, Hershey (2012).
Turner, S.: The Social Theory of Pracitces: Tradition, Tacit Knowledge and Presuppositions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1994).
Adloff, F., Gerund, K., Kaldewey, D. (eds): Revealing Tacit Knowledge. Embodiment and Explication. Transcript, Bielefeld (2015).
Smith, V.: Ethnographies of Work and the Work of Ethnographers. In: Atkinson, P., et al. (eds) Handbook of Ethnography, pp. 220-233. Sage, London/Los Angeles (2007).
Passoth, J.-H.,Peuker, B.,Schillmeier, M. (eds): Agency without Actors? New Approaches to Collective Action. Routledge, London (2012).
Hoc, J.-M.: From human – machine interaction to human – machine cooperation. In: Ergonomics (7) 43, pp. 833-843. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2000)
Latour, B.: Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005).
Law, J., Hassard, J. (eds.): Actor Netword Theory and After. Blackwell, Oxford (1999).
Mead, G. H.: The Definition of the Psychical. In: Decennial Publications of the University of Chicago (1) 3, pp. 77-112. Chicago University Press, Chicago (1903).
Dewey, J: The Reflex Arc Concept in Psychology. In: Psychological Review 3, 357-370. American Psychological Association: Washington (1896).
Durkheim, E.: The Rules of Sociological Method. The Free Press, New York/London (1982).
Latour, http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/P-67%20ACTOR-NETWORK.pdf.
Hughes, J., Randall, D., Shapiro, D.: From ethnographic record to System design. Some experiences in the field. Journal of CSCW (1) 3, pp. 123-141, Springer, New York (1997).
Schubert, C, Rammert, W.: Technografie. Zur Mikrosoziologie der Technik. Campus, Frankfurt a.M. (2006).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
<p>This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, a link is provided to the Creative Commons license and any changes made are indicated.</p> <p>The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the work's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if such material is not included in the work's Creative Commons license and the respective action is not permitted by statutory regulation, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to duplicate, adapt or reproduce the material.</p>
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Müller, P., Passoth, JH. (2018). Social Science Contributions to Engineering Projects: Looking Beyond Explicit Knowledge Through the Lenses of Social Theory. In: Niggemann, O., Schüller, P. (eds) IMPROVE - Innovative Modelling Approaches for Production Systems to Raise Validatable Efficiency. Technologien für die intelligente Automation, vol 8. Springer Vieweg, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-57805-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-57805-6_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer Vieweg, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-57804-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-57805-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)