Skip to main content

Operative Prinzipien

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Psychosoziale Aspekte der Adipositas-Chirurgie

Zusammenfassung

Die Zunahme der Adipositas insbesondere bei den jüngeren Erwachsenen stellt ein erhebliches gegenwärtiges und auch zukünftiges gesundheitspolitisches und sozioökonomisches Problem dar. Ein operativer Eingriff stellt in den meisten Fällen die gegenwärtig einzig verfügbare nachhaltige Therapieoption dar, die auch an erster Stelle stehen kann. Getrennt wird neuerdings zwischen der klassischen Adipositaschirurgie und der Metabolischen Chirurgie, bei letzterer wird die Indikation primär zur Verbesserung der glykämischen Stoffwechsellage bei einem vorbestehenden Typ-2-Diabetes gestellt. Das Therapieziel adipositaschirurgischer Eingriffe ist es, durch eine nachhaltige Gewichtsreduktion und metabolische Veränderungen Folgendes zu erreichen: Verbesserung der Lebensqualität, Remission, Besserung bzw. Prophylaxe von Begleiterkrankungen, Verlängerung des Überlebens und Erhalt der Teilhabe (am Arbeitsleben, am gemeinschaftlichen und kulturellen Leben).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • ADA (American Diabetes Association) (2017) Standards of medical care in diabetes – 2017. Diabetes Care 40(Suppl 1):1–135

    Google Scholar 

  • AWMF (2018) S3-Leitlinie Chirurgie der Adipositas und metabolischer Erkrankungen. Volltext von Leitlinie und Leitlinienreport. http://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/088-001.html

  • Boido A, Ceriani V, Cetta F, Lombardi F, Pontiroli AE (2015) Bariatric surgery and prevention of cardiovascular events and mortality in morbid obesity: mechanisms of action and choice of surgery. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 25:437–443

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buchwald H, Estok R, Fahrbach K, Banel D, Jensen MD, Pories WJ, Bantle JP, Sledge I (2009) Weight and type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med 122:248–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang SH, Stoll CR, Song J, Varela JE, Eagon CJ, Colditz GA (2013) The effectiveness and risks of bariatric surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis, 2003–2012. JAMA Surg 149:275–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt JL, Pickett K, Loveman E, Frampton GK (2015) Surgery for weight loss in adults. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 8, Cd003641

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich A (2018) Wird die laparoskopische Sleevegastrektomie als ‚stand alone‘ Verfahren weiter existieren? – Ein prozedurenkritischer Ausblick. Chirurg 89(8):10.1007/s00104-018-0680-8

  • Georgiadou D, Sergentanis TN, Nixon A, Diamantis T, Tsigris C, Psaltopoulou T (2014) Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic mini gastric bypass. A systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis 10:984–991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedberg J, Sundström J, Sundbom M (2014) Duodenal switch versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: systematic review and meta-analysis of weight results, diabetes resolution and early complications in single-centre comparisons. Obes Rev 15:555–563

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hess DS, Hess DW (1998) Biliopancreatic diversion with a duodenal switch. Obes Surg 8:267–282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar SB, Hamilton BC, Wood SG, Rogers SJ, Carter JT, Lin MY (2018) Is laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy safer than laparoscopic gastric bypass? a comparison of 30-day complications using the MBSAQIP data registry. Surg Obes Relat Dis 14(3):264–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li P, Fu P, Chen J, Wang LH, Wang DR (2013) Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass vs. laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity and diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of sixteen recent studies. Hepatogastroenterology 60(121):132–137

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marceau P, Biron S, Bourque RA, Potvin M, Hould FS, Simard S (1993) Biliopancreatic diversion with a new type of gastrectomy. Obes Surg 1:29–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingrone G, Panunzi S, De Gaetano A, Guidone C, Iaconelli A, Nanni G, Castagneto M, Bornstein S, Rubino F (2015) Bariatric-metabolic surgery versus conventional medical treatment in obese patients with type 2 diabetes: 5 year follow-up of an open-label, single-centre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 386(9997):964–973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osland E, Yunus RM, Khan S, Alodat T, Memon B, Memon MA (2016) Postoperative early major and minor complications in laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy (LVSG) versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) procedures. a meta-analysis and systematic review. Obes Surg 26(10):2273–2284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padwal R, Klarenbach S, Wiebe N, Birch D, Karmali S, Manns B, Hazel M, Sharma AM, Tonelli M (2011) Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials. Obes Rev 12(8):602–621

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Panunzi S, de Gaetano A, Carnicelli A, Mingrone G (2014) Predictors of remission of diabetes mellitus in severely obese individuals undergoing bariatric surgery: do BMI or procedure choice matter? a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 26:459–467

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterli R, Borbély Y, Kern B, Gass M, Peters T, Thurnheer M, Schultes B, Laederach K, Bueter M, Schiesser M (2013) Early results of the Swiss Multicentre Bypass or Sleeve Study (SM-BOSS): a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Ann Surg 258(5):690–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quan Y, Huang A, Ye M, Xu M, Zhuang B, Zhang P, Yu B, Min Z (2015) Efficacy of laparoscopic mini gastric bypass for obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterol Res Pract:152852. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/152852

  • Ren CJ, Patterson E, Gagner M (2000) Early results of laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: a case series of 40 consecutive patients. Obes Surg 10:514–523

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Risstad H, Søvik TT, Engström M, Aasheim ET, Fagerland MW, Olsén MF, Kristinsson JA, Roux CW le, Bøhmer T, Birkeland KI, Mala T, Olbers T (2015) Five-year outcomes after laparoscopic gastric bypass and laparoscopic duodenal switch in patients with body mass index of 50 to 60: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 150(4):352–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutledge R (2001) The mini-gastric bypass: experience with the first 1,274 cases. Obes Surg 11(3):276–280

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salminen P, Helmiö M, Ovaska J, Juuti A, Leivonen M, Peromaa-Haavisto P, Hurme S, Soinio M, Nuutila P, Victorzon M (2018) Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic roux-en-y gastric bypass on weight loss at 5 years among patients with morbid obesity: the SLEEVEPASS randomized clinical trial. JAMA 319(3):241–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio MÁ, Conde M, Arrue E, Pérez-Aguirre E, Torres A (2015) Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass as a second step after sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 11:351–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schauer PR, Bhatt DL, Kirwan JP, Wolski K, Aminian A, Brethauer SA, Navaneethan SD, Singh RP, Pothier CE, Nissen SE, Kashyap SR, Investigators STAMPEDE (2017) Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes – 5-year outcomes. N Engl J Med 376(7):641–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scopinaro N, Gianetta E, Civalleri D, Bonalumi U, Bachi V (1979) Bilio-pancreatic bypass for obesity: II. Initial experience in man. Br J Surg 66:618–620

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Telem DA, Gould J, Pesta C, Powers K, Majid S, Greenberg JA, Teixeira A, Brounts L, Lin H, DeMaria E, Rosenthal R (2017) American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: care pathway for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 13(5):742–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trastulli S, Desiderio J, Guarino S, Cirocchi R, Scalercio V, Noya G, Parisi A (2013) Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy compared with other bariatric surgical procedures: a systematic review of randomized trials. Surg Obes Relat Dis 9:816–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittgrove AC, Clark GW (2000) Laparoscopic gastric bypass, Roux-en-Y- 500 patients: technique and results, with 3–60 month follow-up. Obes Surg 10(3):233–239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wittgrove AC1, Clark GW, Tremblay LJ (1994) Laparoscopic gastric bypass, Roux-en-Y: preliminary report of five cases. Obes Surg 4(4):353–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu J, Zhou X, Li L, Li S, Tan J, Li Y, Sun X (2015) The long-term effects of bariatric surgery for type 2 diabetes: systematic reviewand meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized evidence. Obes Surg 25:143–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Yuan Y, Qiu C, Zhang W (2014) A meta-analysis of 2-year effect after surgery: laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity and diabetes mellitus. Obes Surg 4:1528–1535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Wang J, Sun X, Cao Z, Xu X, Liu D, Xin X, Qin M (2015) Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity and related comorbidities: a meta-analysis of 21 studies. Obes Surg 25(1):19–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arne Dietrich .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dietrich, A. (2019). Operative Prinzipien. In: de Zwaan, M., Herpertz, S., Zipfel, S. (eds) Psychosoziale Aspekte der Adipositas-Chirurgie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-57364-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-57364-8_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-57363-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-57364-8

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics