Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Urteilen und Entscheiden im Sport

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sportpsychologie

Zusammenfassung

Psychologische Theorien erklären Urteile und Entscheidungen und spezifizieren die ihnen zugrundeliegenden Prozesse. So können Urteile und Entscheidungen viele oder wenige Informationen berücksichtigen, schnell oder langsam sein und auf bewusstem Nachdenken oder auf Routinen beruhen. Verschiedene Faktoren können unerwünschte Einflüsse auf Urteile und Entscheidungen ausüben. Dazu gehören Vorwissen, Zuschauerlärm und die Urteile und Entscheidungen anderer. So legen sportpsychologische Studien nahe, dass frühere Entscheidungen von Unparteiischen spätere Entscheidungen beeinflussen, dass Unparteiische strenger urteilen, wenn Zuschauer und Zuschauerinnen lauter sind und dass Mitglieder von Kampfgerichten sich von den Urteilen der anderen Mitglieder beeinflussen lassen. Urteile und Entscheidungen im Sport können durch Interventionen verbessert werden. Dazu ist ein grundlagenwissenschaftliches Verständnis des jeweiligen Urteils- oder Entscheidungsvorgangs hilfreich.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Anderson, K. J., & Pierce, D. A. (2009). Officiating bias: The effect of foul differential on foul calls in NCAA basketball. Journal of Sports Sciences, 27, 686–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldo, M. V. C., Ranvaud, R. D., & Morya, E. (2002). Flag errors in soccer games: The flash-lag effect brought to real life. Perception, 31, 1205–1210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Eli, M., Avugos, S., & Raab, M. (2006). Twenty years of „hot hand“ research. The hot hand phenomenon: Review and critique. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 7, 525–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J. (2000). Thinking and deciding (3. Aufl.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennis, W. M., & Pachur, T. (2006). Fast and frugal heuristic in sports. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 7, 611–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betsch, T. (2008). The nature of intuition and its neglect in research on judgment and decision making. In H. Plessner, C. Betsch, & T. Betsch (Hrsg.), Intuition in judgment and decision making (S. 3–22). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betsch, T., Funke, J., & Plessner, H. (2011). Denken – Urteilen, Entscheiden, Problemlösen. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boen, F., Vanden Auweele, Y., Claes, E., Feys, J., & De Cuyper, B. (2006). The impact of open feedback on conformity among judges in rope skipping. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 7, 577–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boen, F., Van Hoye, K., Vanden Auweele, Y., Feys, J., & Smits, T. (2008). Open feedback in gymnastic judging causes conformity bias based on informational influencing. Journal of Sports Sciences, 26, 621–628.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brunswik, E. (1952). The conceptual framework of psychology. (Int. Encycl. unified Sci., v. 1, no. 10.). Oxford: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campell, D., & Kenny, D. (1999). A primer on regression artifacts. New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooksey, R. W. (1996). The methodology of social judgment theory. Thinking and Reasoning, 2, 141–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damisch, L., Mussweiler, T., & Plessner, H. (2006). Olympic medals as fruits of comparison? Assimilation and contrast in sequential performance judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 12, 166–178.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. R. (1838). This is the Question Marry Not Marry [Memorandum on marriage]. (7.1838) CUL-DAR210.8.2. http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?viewtype=side&itemID=CUL-DAR210.8.2&pageseq=1.

  • Darwin, E. (1882). Reminiscences of Charles Darwin’s last years. CUL-DAR210.9. http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?viewtype=side&itemID=CUL-DAR210.9&pageseq=16.

  • Dawes, R. M. (1998). Behavioral decision making and judgment. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Hrsg.), The handbook of social psychology (4. Aufl., S. 497–548). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, M. E., & Kurz, E. M. (1996). Social judgment theory. Thinking and Reasoning, 2, 109–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational influence upon individual judgement. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, W. (1954). The theory of decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 380–417.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. St. B. T. (2010). Intuition and reasoning: A dual-process perspective. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 313–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. St. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 223–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fasold, F., Memmert, D., & Unkelbach, C. (2015). A theory-based intervention to prevent calibration effects in serial sport performance evaluations. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 18, 47–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furley, P., & Memmert, D. (2012). Working memory capacity as controlled attention in tactical decision making. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 34, 322–344.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Furley, P., & Memmert, D. (2015). Creativity and working memory capacity in sports: working memory capacity is not a limiting factor in creative decision making amongst skilled performers. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 115.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Furley, P., Schweizer, G., & Bertrams, A. (2015). The two modes of an athlete: Dual-process theories in the field of sport. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 8, 106–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103, 650–669.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G, & Goldstein, D. G. (1999). Betting on one good reason. The take the best heuristic. In G. Gigerenzer, P. M. Todd, & the ABC Research Group, Simple heuristics that make us smart (S. 75–95). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G. Todd, P. M., & the ABC Research Group. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G., & Selten, R. (Hrsg.). (2001). Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilovich, T., Vallone, R., & Tversky, A. (1985). The hot hand in basketball: On the misperception of random sequences. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 295–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2008). Multiple-reason decision making based on automatic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1055–1075.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, W. M. (2004). Social judgment theory: Applying and extending Brunswik’s probabilistic functionalism. In D. Koehler & N. Harvey (Hrsg.), Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making (S. 37–61). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helsen, W., & Bultynck, J. B. (2004). Physical and perceptual-cognitive demands of top-class refereeing in association football. Journal of Sports Sciences, 22, 179–189.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helsen, W., Gilis, B., & Weston, M. (2006). Errors in judging „offside“ in football: Test of the optical error versus the perceptual flash-lag hypothesis. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24, 512–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. G., & Raab, M. (2003). Take the first: Option-generation and resulting choices. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, 215–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. V., Paul, G. C., & Erskine, J. (2002). The impact of a team’s reputation on the decisions of association football referees. Journal of Sports Sciences, 20, 991–1000.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Hrsg.). (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mascarenhas, D. R. D., Collins, D., & Mortimer, P. W. (2002). The art of reason versus the exactness of science in elite refereeing: comments on Plessner and Betsch (2001). Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 24, 328–333.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCord, J. (2003). Cures that harm: unanticipated outcomes of crime prevention programs. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 587, 7–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Memmert, D. (2013). Tactical creativity. In T. McGarry, P. O’Donoghue, & J. Sampaio (Hrsg.), Routledge handbook of sports performance analysis (S. 297–308). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. B., & Sanjurjo, A. (2015). A cold shower for the hot hand fallacy. IGIER Working Paper No. 518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. B., & Sanjurjo, A. (2016). Surprised by the gambler’s and hot hand fallacies? A truth in the law of small numbers. IGIER Working Paper No. 552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mussweiler, T. (2003). Comparison processes in social judgment: Mechanisms and consequences. Psychological Review, 110, 472–489.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nevill, A. M., Balmer, N. J., & Williams, A. M. (1999). Crowd influence on decisions in association football. Lancet, 353, 1416–1416.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oudejans, R. R. D., Verheijen, R., Bakker, F. C., Gerrits, J. C., Steinbrücken, M., & Beek, P. J. (2000). Errors in judging „offside“ in football. Nature, 404, 33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oudejans, R. R. D., Bakker, F. C., Verheijen, R., Steinbrückner, M., Gerrits, J. C., & Beek, P. J. (2005). How position and motion of expert assistant referees in soccer relate to the quality of their offside judgements during actual match play. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 36, 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plessner, H. (1999). Expectation biases in gymnastics judging. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 21, 131–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plessner, H., & Betsch, T. (2001). Sequential effects in important referee decisions: The case of penalties in soccer. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 23, 254–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plessner, H., & Betsch, T. (2002). Refereeing in sports is supposed to be a craft, not an art. Response to Mascarenhas, Collins, and Mortimer (2002). Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 24, 334–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plessner, H., Schweizer, G., Brand, R., & O’Hare, D. (2009). A multiple-cue learning approach as the basis for understanding and improving soccer referees’ decision making. In M. Raab, J. Johnson, & H. Heekeren (Hrsg.), Progress in brain research: Mind and motion: The bidirectional link between thought and action (S. 151–158). Amsterdam: Elsevier Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Raab, M., Gula, B., & Gigerenzer, G. (2012). The hot hand exists in Volleyball and is used for allocation decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18, 81–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, K. (2003). Spielintelligenz. In P. Röthig & R. Prohl (Hrsg.), Sportwissenschaftliches Lexikon (7. Aufl., S. 487–488). Schorndorf: Hofmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Atzert, L., & Amelang, M. (2012). Psychologische Diagnostik (5., vollst. überarbeitete u. erweiterte Aufl.). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, W. (2011). Compensating tendencies in penalty kick decisions of referees in professional football: Evidence from the German Bundesliga 1963–2006. Journal of Sports Sciences, 29, 441–447.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schweizer, G., Plessner, H., & Brand, R. (2013). Establishing standards for basketball elite referees’ decisions. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 25, 370–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1982). Models of bounded rationality. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Unkelbach, C., & Memmert, D. (2008). Game management, context effects, and calibration: The case of yellow cards in soccer. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 30, 95–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unkelbach, C., & Memmert, D. (2010). Crowd noise as a cue in referee decisions contributes to the home advantage. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 32, 483–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unkelbach, C., & Memmert, D. (2014). Serial position effects in evaluative judgments. Current Directions in Psychology Science, 23, 195–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unkelbach, C., Ostheimer, V., Fasold, F., & Memmert, D. (2012). A calibration explanation of serial position effects in evaluative judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decisions, 119, 103–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanden Auweele, Y., Boen, F., De Geest, A., & Feys, F. (2004). Judging bias in synchronized swimming: Open feedback leads to non-performance-based conformity. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 26, 561–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigton, R. S. (1996). Social judgement theory and medical judgment. Thinking and Reasoning, 2, 175–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Sport und Sportwissenschaft, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland

    Geoffrey Schweizer & Henning Plessner

Authors
  1. Geoffrey Schweizer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Henning Plessner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geoffrey Schweizer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Fachgruppe Sportwissenschaft, Universität Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany

    Julia Schüler

  2. Institut für Sportwissenschaft, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Mirko Wegner

  3. Institut für Sport und Sportwissenschaft, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

    Henning Plessner

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schweizer, G., Plessner, H. (2020). Urteilen und Entscheiden im Sport. In: Schüler, J., Wegner, M., Plessner, H. (eds) Sportpsychologie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56802-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56802-6_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-56801-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-56802-6

  • eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation