Advertisement

An Architecture for Intuitive Programming and Robust Execution of Industrial Robot Programs

  • Eric Mathias Orendt
  • Dominik Henrich
Conference paper

Zusammenfassung

Industrial robots are established tools in a variety of automation processes. An important goal in actual research is to transfer the advantages of these tools into environments in small and medium sized enterprises (SME). As tasks in SME environments change from time to time, it is necessary to enable nonexpert workers to program an industrial robot in an intuitive way. Furthermore, robot programs must concern unexpected situations as many SME environments are unstructured, because humans and robots share workspace and workpieces. The main contribution of our work is a robot programming architecture, that concerns both aspects: Intuitive robot programming and robust task execution. Our architecture enables users to create robot programs by guiding a robot kinesthetically through tasks. Relevant task information are extracted by an entity-actor based world model. From these information we encode the demonstrated task as a finite state machine (FSM). The FSM allows the reproduction and adaption of a task by the robot in similar situations. Furthermore, the FSM is utilized in a monitoring component, which identifies unexpected events during task execution.

Schlüsselwörter

behavior based robotics intuitive robot programming robust task execution entity actor framework finite state machines kinesthetic programming 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. 1.
    T. Werner, et al., “Design and Evaluation of a Multi-Agent Software Architecture for Risk- Minimized Path Planning in Human-Robot Workcells,” in Tagungsband des 2. Kongresses Montage Handhabung Industrieroboter, vol. 5, 2017, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    B. D. Argall, et al., “A survey of robot learning from demonstration,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 469–483, 2009.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. Atkeson and S. Schaal, “Robot learning from demonstration,” Machine Learning, no. 1994, pp. 12–20, 1997.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Billard and S. Calinon, “Robot Programming by Demonstration,” in Handbook of Robotics, Chapter 59, 2007, vol. 48, pp. 1371–1394.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Y. Wu and Y. Demiris, “Towards one shot learning by imitation for humanoid robots,” in Proceedings of IEEE ICRA, Anchorage, 2010, pp. 2889–2894.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. Zöllner, et al., “Towards cognitive robots: Building hierarchical task representations of manipulations from human demonstration,” in Proceedings of IEEE ICRA, Barcelona, 2005, pp. 1535–1540.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    E. M. Orendt, et al., “Robot Programming by Non-Experts: Intuitiveness and Robustness of One-Shot Robot Programming,” in Proceedings of IEEE RO-MAN, New York, 2016.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    B. Akgun, et al., “Keyframe-based Learning from Demonstration: Method and Evaluation,” in Proceedings of Social Robotics, Chengdu, 2012, pp. 343–355.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    C. Groth and D. Henrich, “One-Shot Robot Programming by Demonstration using an Online Oriented Particles Simulation,” in Proceedings of IEEE ROBIO, Bali, 2014.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    E. M. Orendt, et al., “Robust One-Shot Robot Programming by Demonstration using Entitybased Resources,” in Advances in Service and Industrial Robotics, Turin, 2017.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. Reiter, “A theory of diagnosis from first principles,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 32, no. 1987, 1987.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. Steinbauer and F. Wotawa, “Robust Plan Execution Using Model-Based Reasoning,” Advanced Robotics, pp. 1315–1326, 2009.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    V. Verma, et al., “Real-time fault diagnosis,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, vol. 11, no. June, pp. 56–66, 2004.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. Kuestenmacher and E. Al, “Towards Robust Task Execution for Domestic Service Robots,” Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, pp. 528–531, 2014.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    E. M. Orendt and D. Henrich, “Design of Robust Robot Programs: Deviation Detection and Classification using Entity-based Resources,” in Proceedings of IEEE ROBIO, Zhuhai, 2015.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    T.Werner, et al., “ENACT: An Efficient and Extensible Entity-Actor Framework for Modular Robotics Software Components,” in International Symposium on Robotics, Munich, 2016, pp. 157–163.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    R. B. Rusu and S. Cousins, “3D is here: point cloud library,” in Proceedings of IEEE ICRA, Shanghai, 2011, pp. 1 – 4.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. Wegerich, et al., Handbuch zur IBIS Toolbox. Technische Universit¨at Berlin, 2012.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    F. Pollmann, et al., “Evaluation of interaction methods for a real-time augmented reality game,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8215 LNCS, pp. 120–125, 2013.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chair for Applied Computer Science III, Robotics and Embedded SystemsUniversity of BayreuthBayreuthDeutschland

Personalised recommendations