Advertisement

Towards Fully Automated Determination of Laryngeal Adductor Reflex Latencies through High-Speed Laryngoscopy Image Processing

  • Jacob F. Fast
  • Martin Ptok
  • Michael Jungheim
  • Robin Szymanski
  • Tobias Ortmaier
  • Lüder A. Kahrs
Conference paper
Part of the Informatik aktuell book series (INFORMAT)

Zusammenfassung

Protective reflexes of the larynx help to avoid intrusion of foreign particles into the lower airways, which can lead to aspiration pneumonia. These protective mechanisms include the Laryngeal Adductor Reflex (LAR), a rapid adduction of the vocal folds. Up to now, the LAR latency could only be determined manually by visually assessing laryngoscopic high-speed video sequences obtained during and after stimulation of the larynx by water droplet impact. Here, we present a novel image processing algorithm based on difference image calculation and optical flow analysis for a more objective LAR latency determination. To evaluate our prototype algorithm, we compared the results obtained for a set of example sequences with the values given by two expert phoniatricians. The results show a very good LAR stimulation detection performance. LAR onset detection remains challenging for our algorithmic approach as well as for the human perceptive system, as demonstrated by a low inter-rater reliability.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. 1.
    Eurostat. Causes of death statistics - people over 65; accessed: 25/10/2017. goo.gl/36wJqU.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Marik PE, Kaplan D. Aspiration pneumonia and dysphagia in the elderly. Chest. 2003;124(1):328–336.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sinclair CF, Téllez MJ, Tapia OR, et al. Contralateral R1 and R2 components of the laryngeal adductor reflex in humans under general anesthesia. Laryngoscope. 2017;127(12):E443–E448.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sasaki CT, Leder SB. Pharyngoglottal closure reflex: characterization in healthy young, elderly and dysphargic patients with predeglutitive aspiration. Gerontology. 2003;49(1):12–20.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    5. Aviv JE, Kim T, Sacco R, et al. FEEST: a new bedside endoscopic test of the motor and sensory components of swallowing. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1998;64(3):378–387.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kim YH, Kang JW, Kim KM. Characteristics of glottic closure reflex in a canine model. Yonsei Med J. 2009;50(3):380–384.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ptok M, Schroeter S. Deliberate release of the laryngeal adductor reflex via microdroplet impulses: Development of a device. HNO. 2016;64(3):149–155.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fast JF, Muley A, Kühn D, et al. Towards microprocessor-based control of droplet parameters for endoscopic laryngeal adductor reflex triggering. Curr Direct Biomed Eng. 2017;3(2):239–243.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dollinger M, Hoppe U, Hettlich F, et al. Vibration parameter extraction from endoscopic image series of the vocal folds. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2008;49(8):773–781.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Luegmair G, Mehta DD, Kobler JB, et al. Three-dimensional optical reconstruction of vocal fold kinematics using high-speed video with a laser projection system. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2015;34(12):2572–2582.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jacob F. Fast
    • 1
  • Martin Ptok
    • 2
  • Michael Jungheim
    • 2
  • Robin Szymanski
    • 1
  • Tobias Ortmaier
    • 1
  • Lüder A. Kahrs
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Mechatronic SystemsLeibniz Universität HannoverHannoverDeutschland
  2. 2.Department of Phoniatrics and Pediatric AudiologyHannover Medical SchoolHannoverDeutschland

Personalised recommendations