On Generalized Noun Phrases

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10686)


Generalized noun phrases are expressions which play the role of verbal arguments in the same way as ordinary NPs. However proper generalized NPs cannot easily occur in all argumental positions of the verb. Two types of generalized NPs are distinguished and semantically characterized and various properties of functions they denote are studied. These properties indicate similarities and differences between ordinary NPs and generalized NPs and show that generalized NPs essentially extend the expressive power of natural languages.


  1. Barwise, J., Cooper, R.: Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguist. Philos. 4, 159–219 (1981)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Geach, P.T.: Reference and Generality. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (1968)Google Scholar
  3. Keenan, E.L.: On the denotations of anaphors. Res. Lang. Comput. 5, 5–17 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Keenan, E.L.: In situ interpretation without type mismatches. J. Seman. 33(1), 87–106 (2016)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. Keenan, E., Faltz, L.: Boolean Semantics for Natural Language. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht (1985)MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Keenan, E.L., Westerståhl, D.: Generalized quantifiers in linguistics and logic. In: van Benthem, J., ter Meulen, A. (eds.) Handbook of Logic and Language, pp. 837–893. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Partee, B.: Noun phrase interpretation and type-shifting principles. In: Groenendijk, J., et al. (eds.) Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and Theory of Generalised Quantifiers, pp. 115–143. Forris, Dordrecht (1986)Google Scholar
  8. Zuber, R.: Semantic constraints on anaphoric determiners. Res. Lang. Comput. 8, 255–271 (2010b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Zuber, R.: Some generalised comparative determiners. In: Pogodalla, S., Prost, J.-P. (eds.) LACL 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6736, pp. 267–281. Springer, Heidelberg (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22221-4_18 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Zuber, R.: Generalising predicate and argument invariance. In: Asher, N., Soloviev, S. (eds.) LACL 2014. LNCS, vol. 8535, pp. 163–176. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  11. Zuber, R.: Anaphors and quantifiers. In: Väänänen, J., Hirvonen, Å., de Queiroz, R. (eds.) WoLLIC 2016. LNCS, vol. 9803, pp. 432–445. Springer, Heidelberg (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-52921-8_26 Google Scholar
  12. Zuber, R.: Reflexive and reciprocal determiners. In: Hansen, H.H., Murray, S.E., Sadrzadeh, M., Zeevat, H. (eds.) TbiLLC 2015. LNCS, vol. 10148, pp. 185–201. Springer, Heidelberg (2017a).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54332-0_11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Zuber, R.: Set partitions and the meaning of the same. J. Logic Lang. Inform. 26, 1–20 (2017b)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CNRS, Laboratoire de Linguistique FormelleParisFrance

Personalised recommendations