Abstract
Membrane electrode assembly (MEA) is the core component of proton exchange membrane fuel cell, which is composed of proton exchange membrane, cathode and anode catalytic layers and gas diffusion layers. The cost of MEA accounts for more than 60% of that of the total system, and particularly, the cost of platinum (Pt) catalysts accounts for nearly 70% of MEA cost. It has been well recognized that the high cost caused by high Pt loading in MEA is one of the key issues that hinder the commercialization of fuel cells, and thus the most direct way to reduce the cost of fuel cells is to reduce the amount of Pt in the MEA. However, a continuous decrease in the Pt loading in MEA will cause more serious activation overpotential and oxygen transport problems. In order to solve the above difficulties, on one hand, low Pt electrocatalysts, such as Pt alloy catalysts, Pt core–shell catalysts and shape-controlled Pt-based nanocrystals, have been proposed to improve the catalytic activities in the MEA, and on the other hand, accurately measuring the mass transfer resistance in catalytic layers is conducive to the development of low Pt membrane electrode technology. In this section, the introduction of PEMFCs and the components of MEA including proton exchange membrane (PEM), catalyst layers and gas diffusion layers (GDLs) are then discussed. In addition, low Pt electrocatalysts are our focus.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Liu CY, Sung CC (2012) A review of the performance and analysis of proton exchange membrane fuel cell membrane electrode assemblies. J Power Sources 220:348–353
Yang SY, Seo DJ, Kim MJ et al (2016) Fast stack activation procedure and effective long-term storage for high-performance polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell. J Power Sources 328:75–80
Borup RL, Meyers JP, Pivovar BS et al (2007) Scientific aspects of polymer electrolyte fuel cell durability and degradation. Chem Rev 107:3904–3951
Tseng CJ, Lo SK (2010) Effects of microstructure characteristics of gas diffusion layer and microporous layer on the performance of PEMFC. Energy Convers Manage 51:677–684
Appleby AJ, Foulkes FR (1989) Fuel cell handbook. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York
Ticianelli EA, Derouin CR, Redondo A et al (1988) Methods to advance technology of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J Electrochem Soc 135:2209–2214
Wilson MS, Gottesfeld SJ (1992) Influence of the structure in low Pt loading electrodes for polymer electrolyte fuel cells. J Electrochem Soc 139:L28–30
Mehta V, Cooper J (2003) Review and analysis of PEM fuel cell design and manufacturing. J Power Sources 114:32–53
Leimin X, Shijun L, Lijun Y et al (2009) Investigation of a novel catalyst coated membrane method to prepare low platinum-loading membrane electrode assemblies for PEMFCs. Fuel Cells 9:101–105
Grubb WT Jr (1959) Batteries with solid ion-exchange electrolytes. J Electrochem Soc 106:275
Grot W, Resnick P (1987) U.S. Patent 4,113,585
Kraytsberg A, Ein-El Y (2014) Review of advanced materials for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Energy Fuels 28:7303–7330
Michael AY, Matthew JL, Steven JH et al (2019) New directions in perfluoroalkyl sulfonic acid-based proton-exchange membranes. Curr Opin Electrochem 18:90–98
Zhang LW, Chae SR, Hendren Z et al (2012) Recent advances in proton exchange membranes for fuel cell applications. Chem Eng J 204:87–97
Kreuer KD (1996) Proton conductivity: materials and applications. Chem Mater 8:610–641
Haubold HG, Vad T, Jungbluth H et al (2001) Nano structure of NAFION: a SAXS study. Electrochim Acta 46:1559–1563
Gebel G (2000) Structural evolution of water swollen perfluorosulfonated ionomers from dry membrane to solution. Polymer 41:5829–5838
Herring AM (2006) Inorganic-polymer composite membranes for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J Macromol Sci Part C Polym Rev 46:245–296
Sun X, Simonsen SC, Norby T et al (2019) Composite membranes for high temperature PEM fuel cells and electrolytes: a critical review. Membranes 9:1–46
Okazoe T, Shirakawa D, Murata K (2012) Application of liquid-phase direct fluorination: novel synthetic methods for a polyfluorinated coating material and a monomer of a perfluorinated polymer electrolyte membrane. Appl Sci 2:327–341
Holdcroft S (2014) Fuel cell catalyst layers: a polymer science perspective. Chem Mater 26:381–393
Conway BE, Tilak BV (2002) Interfacial processes involving electrocatalytic evolution and oxidation of H2, and the role of chemisorbed H. Electrochim Acta 47:3571
Fishtik I, Callaghan CA, Fehribach RD (2005) A reaction route graph analysis of the electrochemical hydrogen oxidation and evolution reactions. J Electroanal Chem 576:57–63
Debe MK (2012) Electrocatalyst approaches and challenges for automotive fuel cells. Nature 486:43–51
Norskov JK, Rossmeisl J, Logadottir A et al (2004) Origin of the overpotential for oxygen reduction at a fuel-cell cathode. J Phys Chem B 108:17886–17892
Karen E, Swider L, Stephen A (2013) Campbell. Physical chemistry research toward proton exchange membrane fuel cell advancement. J Phys Chem Lett 4:393–401
Gasteiger HA, Panels JE, Yan SG (2004) Dependence of PEM fuel cell performance on catalyst loading. J Power Sources 127:162–171
Gasteiger HA, Kocha SS, Sompalli B et al (2005) Activity benchmarks and requirements for Pt, Pt-alloy, and non-Pt oxygen reduction catalysts for PEMFCs. Appl Catal B 56:9–35
Alia SM, Ngo C, Shulda S et al (2016) Highly active and durable extended surface oxygen reduction electrocatalysts. ECS Meeting Abstracts MA2016-02, 2445
Park J, Wang H, Vara M et al (2016) Platinum cubic nanoframes with enhanced catalytic activity and durability toward oxygen reduction. ChemSusChem 9:2855–2861
Costamagna P, Srinivasan S (2001) Quantum jumps in the PEMFC science and technology from the 1960s to the year 2000: Part I. Fundamental scientific aspects. J Power Sources 102:242–252
Wilson MS, Gottesfeld S (1992) High performance catalyzed membranes of ultra-low Pt loading for polymer electrolyte fuel cells. J Electrochem Soc 139:L28–L30
Srinivasan S, Ticianelli EA, Derouin CR et al (1988) Advances in solid polymer electrolyte fuel cell technology with low platinum loading electrodes. J Power Sources 22:359–375
Cindrella L, Kannan AM, Lin JF et al (2009) Gas diffusion layer for proton exchange membrane fuel cells—a review. J Power Sources 194:146–160
Jayakumar A, Sethu S, Ramos M et al (2014) A technical review on gas diffusion, mechanism and medium of PEM fuel cell. Ionics 21:1–18
Jorg R, Jens E, Federica M et al (2013) Investigation of the representative area of the water saturation in gas diffusion layers of polymer electrolyte fuel cells. J Phys Chem C 117:25991–25999
Mathias M, Roth J, Lehnert W (2003) Diffusion media materials and characterization. John Wiley & Sons, New York
Liao YK, Ko TH, Liu CH (2008) Performance of a polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell with fabricated carbon fiber cloth electrode. Energy Fuels 22:3351–3354
Liu CH, Ko TH, Chang EC et al (2008) Effect of carbon fiber paper made from carbon felt with different yard weights on the performance of low temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J Power Sources 180:276–282
Yazici MS (2007) Mass transfer layer for liquid fuel cells. J Power Sources 166:424–429
Thomas YRJ, Benayad A, Schroder M et al (2015) New method for super hydrophobic treatment of gas diffusion layers for proton exchange membrane fuel cells using electrochemical reduction of diazonium salts. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:15068–15077
Laoun B, Kasat HA, Ahmad R et al (2018) Gas diffusion layer development using design of experiments for the optimization of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell performance. Energy 151:689–695
Ozden A, Shahgaldi S, Zhao J et al (2018) Assessment of graphene as an alternative microporous layer material for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Fuel 215:726–734
Barbir F (2005) PEM fuel cells: theory and practice. Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam
Banham D, Ye SY (2017) Current status and future development of catalyst materials and catalyst layers for proton exchange membrane fuel cells: an industrial perspective. ACS Energy Lett 2:629–638
Yu X, Ye S (2007) Recent advances in activity and durability enhancement of Pt/C catalytic cathode in PEMFC: Part II: Degradation mechanism and durability enhancement of carbon supported platinum catalyst. J Power Sources 172:145–154
Yu X, Ye S (2007) Recent advances in activity and durability enhancement of Pt/C catalytic cathode in PEMFC: Part I. Physico-chemical and electronic interaction between Pt and carbon support, and activity enhancement of Pt/C catalyst. J Power Sources 172:133–144
Jalan V, Taylor EJ (1983) Importance of interatomic spacing in catalytic reduction of oxygen in phosphoric acid. J Electrochem Soc 130:2299
Jalan VM, Landsman DA, Lee JM (1980) U.S. Patent 4,192,907
Toda T, Igarashi H, Uchida H et al (1999) Enhancement of the electroreduction of oxygen on Pt alloys with Fe, Ni, and Co. J Electrochem Soc 146:3750–3756
Stamenkovic V, Schmidt TJ, Ross PN et al (2002) Surface composition effects in electrocatalysis: kinetics of oxygen reduction on well-defined Pt3Ni and Pt3Co alloy surfaces. J Phys Chem B 106:11970–11979
Jia QY, Liang WT, Bates MK et al (2015) Activity descriptor identification for oxygen reduction on platinum-based bimetallic nanoparticles: in situ observation of the linear composition-strain-activity relationship. ACS Nano 9:387–400
Stephens IEL, Bondarenko AS, Gronbjerg U et al (2012) Understanding the electrocatalysis of oxygen reduction on platinum and its alloys. Energy Environ Sci 5:6744–6762
Park HY, Jeon TY, Jang JH et al (2013) Enhancement of oxygen reduction reaction on PtAu nanoparticles via CO induced surface Pt enrichment. Appl Catal B 129:375–381
Stamenkovic VR, Mun BS, Arenz M et al (2007) Trends in electrocatalysis on extended and nanoscale Pt-bimetallic alloy surfaces. Nat Mater 6:241–247
Wang C, Li D, Chi M et al (2012) Rational development of ternary alloy electrocatalysts. J Phys Chem Lett 3:1668–1673
Ozenler S, Sahin N, Akaydin B et al (2011) ECS Trans 41:1031–1042
Wang C, Wang G, van der Vliet D et al (2010) Monodisperse Pt3Co nanoparticles as electrocatalyst: the effects of particle size and pretreatment on electrocatalytic reduction of oxygen. Phys Chem Chem Phys 12:6933–6939
Loukrakpam R, Luo J, He T et al (2011) Nanoengineered PtCo and PtNi catalysts for oxygen reduction reaction: an assessment of the structural and electrocatalytic properties. J Phys Chem C 115:1682–1694
Shao MH, Chang QW, Dodelet JP et al (2016) Recent advances in electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction. Chem Rev 116:3594–3657
Hou JB, Yang M, Ke CC et al (2020) Platinum-group-metal catalysts for proton exchange membrane fuel cells: from catalyst design to electrode structure optimization. EnergyChem
Wang C, Chi M, Li D et al (2011) Design and synthesis of bimetallic electrocatalyst with multilayered Pt-Skin surfaces. J Am Chem Soc 133:14396–14403
Luo J, Wang L, Mott D et al (2008) Core@shell nanoparticles as electrocatalysts for fuel cell reactions. Adv Mater 20:4342–4347
Hartl K, Mayrhofer KJ, Lopez M et al (2010) AuPt core-shell nanocatalysts with bulk Pt activity. Electrochem Commun 12:1487–1489
Zhang JL, Vukmirovic MB, Sasaki K et al (2005) Mixed-metal Pt monolayer electrocatalysts for enhanced oxygen reduction kinetics. J Am Chem Soc 127:12480–12481
Luo LX, Zhu FJ, Tian RX et al (2007) Composition-graded PdxNi1−x nanospheres with Pt monolayer shells as high-performance electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction. ACS Catal 7:5420–5430
Stamenkovic VR, Fowler B, Mun BS (2007) Improved oxygen reduction activity on Pt3Ni (111) via increased surface site availability. Science 315:493–497
Tian X, Luo J, Nan H et al (2016) J Am Chem Soc 138:1575–1583
Choi SI, Shao MH, Lu N et al (2014) Synthesis and characterization of Pd@Pt-Ni core-shell octahedra with high activity toward oxygen reduction. ACS Nano 8:10363–10371
Li YD, Wang C, Strmcnik DS et al (2014) Functional links between Pt single crystal morphology and nanoparticles with different size and shape: the oxygen reduction reaction case. Energy Environ Sci 7:4061–4069
Kongkanand A, Mathias M (2016) The priority and challenge of high-power performance of low-platinum proton-exchange membrane fuel cells. J Phys Chem Lett 7:1127–1137
Kishimoto T, Sato T, Kobayashi Y et al (2016) ECS meeting abstracts 2, 2824
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zhang, J., Shen, S. (2021). Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells (PEMFCs). In: Low Platinum Fuel Cell Technologies. Energy and Environment Research in China. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56070-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56070-9_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-56068-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-56070-9
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)