Advertisement

Kulturelle Ansichten zur Genmodifikation beim Menschen

  • Paul Knoepfler
Chapter
  • 2.1k Downloads

Zusammenfassung

Ist die Erschaffung von GM-Menschen der Garant dafür, dass die Menschheit eine sich stets wandelnde, möglicherweise desaströse Zukunft überlebt? Oder würde die Genmodifikation beim Menschen vielmehr eine Katastrophe oder gar seine Vernichtung heraufbeschwören?

Literatur

  1. Belluz J (2015) Francis Collins on CRISPR: „designer babies make great Hollywood – and bad science“. https://www.vox.com/2015/5/18/8612923/francis-collins-crispr. Zugegriffen am 12.06.2017
  2. Cussins J (2014) DNA dreaming. https://www.geneticsandsociety.org/biopolitical-times/dna-dreaming. Zugegriffen am 29.08.2017
  3. Darnovsky M (2015) NIH statement on gene editing highlights need for stronger US stance on genetically modified humans, Says Public Interest Group. https://www.geneticsandsociety.org/press-statement/nih-statement-gene-editing-highlights-need-stronger-us-stance-genetically-modified. Zugegriffen am 29.08.2017
  4. Dvorsky G (2015) The real-life science behind Orphan Black. http://io9.gizmodo.com/the-real-life-science-behind-orphan-black-1694765437. Zugegriffen am 12.06.2017
  5. Eror A (2013) China is engineering genius babies. https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/chinas-taking-over-the-world-with-a-massive-genetic-engineering-program. Zugegriffen am 12.06.2017
  6. Europarat (1997) Details zum Vertrag-Nr.164. http://www.coe.int/de/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/treaty/164. Zugegriffen am 12.06.2017
  7. Godfrey A (2013) Elysium director Neill Blomkamp: ‚You’d have to change the human genome to stop wealth discrepancy‘. The Guardian, 17 August 2013. https://www.theguardian.com/film/2013/aug/17/elysium-neill-bloomkamp-interview. Zugegriffen am 12.06.2017
  8. Grant B (2014) Zeroing in on the „gay gene“. The Scientist, 19 November 2014. http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/41472/title/Zeroing-in-on-the--Gay-Gene-/. Zugegriffen am 12.06.2017
  9. van der Haak B (2012) DNA Dreams. Dokumentarfilm. Regie: Bregtje van der Haak. Produktion: Birgit DopheideGoogle Scholar
  10. Huxley J (1957) New bottles for new wine. Chatto und Windus, London, S 13–14Google Scholar
  11. Ishii T (2015) Germline genome-editing research and its socioethical implications. Trends Mol Med 21(8):473–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Khazan O (2014) We’re already designing babies. https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2014/07/were-already-designing-babies/373896/. Zugegriffen am 12.06.2017
  13. Knoepfler Lab (2015a) Public polling on human genetic modification: mixed, but favor moratorium, 21 Mai 2015. https://ipscell.com/2015/05/crisprpublicpoll/. Zugegriffen am 12.06.2017
  14. Knoepfler Lab (2015b) White House supports moratorium on human genetic modification, 27 Mai 2015. https://ipscell.com/2015/05/white-housegm/. Zugegriffen am 12.06.2017
  15. Knoepfler Lab (2015c) ‚Roundup ready‘ humans? When a reader comment blows your mind, 28 April 2015. https://ipscell.com/2015/04/roundup-ready-humans/. Zugegriffen am 12.06.2017
  16. Knoepfler Lab (2015d) Nita Farahany interview on human germline modification: defining a road forward, 28 Juli 2015. https://ipscell.com/2015/07/farahany/. Zugegriffen am 12.06.2017
  17. Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches und internationales Strafrecht (o. J.) Max-Planck-Datenbank zu den rechtlichen Regelungen zur Fortpflanzungsmedizin in den europäischen Ländern. https://meddb.mpicc.de. Zugegriffen am 26.06.2017
  18. Metzl J (2015) Genetic engineering & the future of humankind. https://www.geneticsandsociety.org/article/genetic-engineering-future-humankind-0. Zugegriffen am 29.08.2017
  19. Moore P (2014) Poll results: genetics. YouGov. https://today.yougov.com/news/2014/01/21/poll-results-genetics/. Zugegriffen am 12.06.2017
  20. Pew Research Center (2015) Genetic modifications for babies. http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/01/29/public-and-scientists-views-on-science-and-society/pi_2015-01-29_science-and-society-03-25/. Zugegriffen am 12.06.2017
  21. Sanghavi DM (2006) Wanting babies like themselves, some parents choose genetic defects. The New York Times, 5 Dezember 2006. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/05/health/05essa.html?_r=0. Zugegriffen am 12.06.2017
  22. Shanks P (2016) Public opposes human germline „enhancement“ by overwhelming majority. https://www.geneticsandsociety.org/biopolitical-times/public-opposes-human-germline-enhancement-overwhelming-majority. Zugegriffen am 29.08.2017
  23. Shelley MW (1818/2010) Frankenstein. Brock AM (Übers) Aufbau, Berlin, S 23, 46Google Scholar
  24. Stern AM (2005) Eugenic nation: faults and frontiers of better breeding in modern America. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  25. Synthetic Biology Project (2015) Public reaction mixed on new technology to edit DNA, but caution urged for researchers. http://www.synbioproject.org/news/project/public-mixed-on-new-technology-to-edit-dna-but-urge-caution-for-researchers/. Zugegriffen am 12.06.2017
  26. Tatlow DK (2015) A scientific ethical divide between China and West. The New York Times, 29 Juni 2015. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/30/science/a-scientific-ethical-divide-between-china-and-west.html?_r=2. Zugegriffen am 12.06.2017
  27. UNESCO (1997) Universal declaration on the human genome and human rights. http://www.unesco.org/new/en/social-and-human-sciences/themes/bioethics/human-genome-and-human-rights/. Zugegriffen am 12.06.2017
  28. US Government (2008) An Act to prohibit discrimination on the basis of genetic information with respect to health insurance and employment. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-110publ233/html/PLAW-110publ233.htm. Zugegriffen am 12.06.2017
  29. Windrem MS, Schanz SJ, Morrow C, Munir J, Chandler-Militello D, Wang S, Goldman SA (2014) A competitive advantage by neonatally engrafted human glial progenitors yields mice whose brains are chimeric for human glia. J Neurosci 34(48):16153–16161CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Knoepfler
    • 1
  1. 1.School of MedicineUC Davis Health SystemDavisVereinigte Staaten von Amerika

Personalised recommendations