Advertisement

Kräftemessen mit Mutter Natur – der erste GMO sapiens

  • Paul Knoepfler
Chapter
  • 2k Downloads

Zusammenfassung

Am 9. November 1977 durchbrachen zwei britische Wissenschaftler eine biologische Schallmauer und veränderten die Menschheit damit für immer. Robert Edwards und Patrick Steptoe, mit denen wir weiter vorne im Buch schon Bekanntschaft geschlossen haben, war es gelungen, in einer Petrischale im Labor einen gesunden menschlichen Embryo zu erzeugen. Dieser Embryo wurde der Mutter erfolgreich eingepflanzt und entwickelte sich zu einem Kind.

Literatur

  1. Ahuja A (2003) ,God is not in charge, we are‘. The Times. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/god-is-not-in-charge-we-are-7jcdgd059hw. Zugegriffen am 16.05.2017
  2. Albert and Mary Lasker Foundation (2001) In vitro fertilization for treating infertility. http://www.laskerfoundation.org/awards/show/in-vitro-fertilization-for-treating-infertility/. Zugegriffen am 29.08.2017
  3. Annas GJ (2010) Resurrection of a stem-cell funding barrier – Dickey-Wicker in court. N Engl J Med 363(18):1687–1689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Authenticated U. S. Government Information GPO (2015) The science and ethics of genetically engineered human DNA. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-114hhrg97564/pdf/CHRG-114hhrg97564.pdf. Zugegriffen am 23.05.2017
  5. Barritt JA, Brenner CA, Malter HE, Cohen J (2001) Mitochondria in human offspring derived from ooplasmic transplantation. Hum Reprod 16(3):513–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. BBC (2013) ‚Test-tube baby‘ Brown hails pioneers on 35th birthday. http://www.bbc.com/news/health-23448665. Zugegriffen am 16.05.2017
  7. BioPolicyWiki (2008) Artikel über die USA. http://biopolicywiki.org/index.php?title=United_States. Stand: 22. April 2008. Zugegriffen am 12.06.2017
  8. BioPolicyWiki (2015) Artikel über das Vereinigte Königreich. http://biopolicywiki.org/index.php?title=United_Kingdom. Stand: 28. Juli 2015. Zugegriffen am 12.06.2017
  9. Committee on Science, Space, & Technology (o. J.) The science and ethics of human genome engineering. https://science.house.gov/sites/republicans.science.house.gov/files/documents/HHRG-114-SY15-WState-JDoudna-20150616.pdf. Zugegriffen am 06.06.2017
  10. Connor S (2014a) Three-parent babies: ‚As long as she’s healthy, I don’t care‘, says mother of IVF child. The Independent, 25 August 2014. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/three-child-babies-the-mothers-view-as-long-as-she-s-healthy-i-don-t-care-9690059.html. Zugegriffen am 22.06.2017
  11. Connor S (2014b) The pioneer behind three-parent babies insists the method is safe. https://www.indy100.com/article/the-pioneer-behind-threeparent-babies-insists-the-method-is-safe--gkCDln9gsl. Zugegriffen am 29.08.2017
  12. Connor S (2015) Three-parent baby pioneer Jamie Grifo: ‚the Brits will be ahead of the world‘. https://www.geneticsandsociety.org/article/three-parent-baby-pioneer-jamie-grifo-brits-will-be-ahead-world. Zugegriffen am 29.08.2017
  13. Council of Europe (1998) Details of Treaty no.168. http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/treaty/168. Zugegriffen am 06.06.2017
  14. Council of Europe (2013) Creation of embryos with genetic material from more than two progenitor persons. Written declaration no. 557. https://med.stanford.edu/content/dam/sm/cirge/documents/activities/journalclubs/Euro_council.pdf. Zugegriffen am 29.08.2017
  15. Cussins J (2013) GM babies? https://www.geneticsandsociety.org/biopolitical-times/gm-babies. Zugegriffen am 29.08.2017
  16. Cyranoski D (2009) DNA swap could avoid inherited diseases. Nature news, 26 August 2009. http://www.nature.com/news/2009/090826/full/news.2009.860.html.  https://doi.org/10.1038/news.2009.860. Zugegriffen am 06.06.2017
  17. Duden Recht A–Z (2015) Fachlexikon für Studium, Ausbildung und Beruf, 3. Aufl. Bibliographisches Institut, Berlin. Lizenzausgabe Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische BildungGoogle Scholar
  18. Edwards RG, Sharpe DJ (1971) Social values and research in human embryology. Nature 231(5298):87–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Esbjornson R, Thomas L (1984) The manipulation of life. Harper & Row, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  20. Farber SA (2008) U.S. scientists’ role in the eugenics movement (1907–1939): a contemporary biologist’s perspective. Zebrafish 5(4):243–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Food and Drug Administration (2002) Transkript des Meetings #32 am 9. Mai 2002. http://www.ipscell.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/2002FDAmtgART.doc. Zugegriffen am 12.06.2017
  22. Greely H (2015) Of science, CRISPR-Cas9, and Asilomar. https://law.stanford.edu/2015/04/04/of-science-crispr-cas9-and-asilomar/. Zugegriffen am 23.05.2017
  23. Günther H-L, Taupitz J, Kaiser P (2014) Embryonenschutzgesetz, 2., neu bearb. Aufl. W. Kohlhammer, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  24. Ishii T (2014) Potential impact of human mitochondrial replacement on global policy regarding germline gene modification. Reprod BioMed Online 29(2):150–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Knoepfler Lab (2014) Open letter to UK Parliament: avoid historic mistake on rushing human genetic modification, 2 November 2014. https://ipscell.com/2014/11/open-letter-to-uk-parliament-avoid-historic-mistake-on-rushing-human-genetic-modification/. Zugegriffen am 29.08.2017
  26. Knoepfler Lab (2015a) Reactions to new Hank Greely human germline modification post, 10 April 2015. https://ipscell.com/2015/04/hank/. Zugegriffen am 23.05.2017
  27. Knoepfler Lab (2015b) US congress wants FDA to consult religious experts and ban human embryo genetic modification, 28 Juni 2015. https://ipscell.com/2015/06/congressembryo/. Zugegriffen am 06.06.2017
  28. Knoepfler Lab (2015c) Doudna & others testify before congress on CRISPR, human germline editing, 19 Juni 2015. https://ipscell.com/2015/06/doudnacongress/. Zugegriffen am 06.06.2017
  29. Knoepfler Lab (2015d) The science and ethics of genetically engineered human DNA. YouTube-Video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FLne4CnMXzo&feature=youtu.be. Zugegriffen am 06.06.2017
  30. Leopoldina (2017) Ethische und rechtliche Beurteilung des genome editing in der Forschung an humanen Zellen. www.leopoldina.org/de/genomchirurgie. Zugegriffen am 24.06.2017
  31. Los Angeles Times (1988) Dr. Patrick Steptoe; Gynecologist delivered the first test-tube baby. http://articles.latimes.com/1988-03-23/news/mn-1905_1_patrick-steptoe. Zugegriffen am 16.05.2017
  32. Montgomery FU (2011) Es wird kein Designerbaby geben. http://www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft/medizin/bundestagsentscheidung-zu-pid-es-wird-kein-designerbaby-geben-a-772984.html. Zugegriffen am 24.06.2017
  33. NCSL (2008) Human cloning laws. http://www.ncsl.org/research/health/human-cloning-laws.aspx. Zugegriffen am 29.08.2017
  34. Obasogie O (2013) Commentary: the eugenics legacy of the nobelist who fathered IVF. Scientific American. 04. Oktober 2013. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/eugenic-legacy-nobel-ivf/. Zugegriffen am 16.05.2017
  35. Pearson H (2003) Human fertility experiment prompts wrath. Nature news, 14 Oktober 2003. http://www.nature.com/news/2003/031014/full/news031013-4.html,  https:\\doi.org\10.1038/news031013-4. Zugegriffen am 29.05.2017
  36. Pritchard C (2014) The girl with three biological parents. http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-28986843. Zugegriffen am 16.05.2017
  37. Tachibana M, Sparman M, Sritanaudomchai H, Ma H, Clepper L, Woodward J, Li Y, Ramsey C, Kolotushkina O, Mitalipov S (2009) Mitochondrial gene replacement in primate offspring and embryonic stem cells. Nature 461(7262):367–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. The Telegraph (2013). Professor Sir Robert Edwards. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/medicine-obituaries/9984988/Professor-Sir-Robert-Edwards.html. Zugegriffen am 16.05.2017
  39. US Conference of Catholic Bishops (o. J.) Current state laws against human embryo research. http://www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/human-life-and-dignity/stem-cell-research/current-state-laws-against-human-embryo-research.cfm. Zugegriffen am 16.05.2017
  40. Zhang J, Zhuang G, Zeng Y, Acosta C, Shu Y, Grifo J (2003) Pregnancy derived from human nuclear transfer. Fertil Steril 80(Suppl 3):56CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Knoepfler
    • 1
  1. 1.School of MedicineUC Davis Health SystemDavisVereinigte Staaten von Amerika

Personalised recommendations