Multispectral Imaging Techniques

Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter we discuss the principle of non-photographic multispectral imaging systems. A digital sensor comprises of a detector part and an optical part. Various types of photo conductive detectors are used for quantifying the radiation intensity. Resolution of a sensor is considered in terms of spatial resolution, spectral resolution, radiometric resolution and temporal resolution. Important types of scanners or imaging devices include: the opto-mechanical line scanner, CCD-line scanner and digital cameras. The focal plane arrays and time-delay integration architecture of CCD linear arrays has added a new dimension to the remote sensing imaging capability.

References

  1. Beynon JDE, Lamb DR (eds) (1980) Charge-coupled devices and their applications. McGraw Hill, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Colvocoresses AP (1979) Multispectral linear array as an alternative to Landsat-D. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 45:67–69Google Scholar
  3. Cracknell AP (1998) Review article: synergy in remote sensing-what’s in a pixel? Int J Remote Sens 19:2025–2074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Joseph G (1996) Imaging sensors for remote sensing. Remote Sens Rev 13:257–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. King DJ (1995) Airborne multispectral digital camera and video sensors: a critical review of system designs and applications. Canadian J Remote Sens 21 (3):245–273. (Special Issue on Aerial Optical Remote Sensing). web-site: www.carleton.ca/~dking/papers.html
  6. Litwiller D (2001) CCD versus CMOS—facts and fiction. Photonics Spectra, Laurin Publishing Co. Inc., PittsfieldGoogle Scholar
  7. Lowe OS (1969) Line scan devices and why we use them. In: Proceedings of the 5th international symposium remote sensing environmental, Ann Arbor, MI, pp 77–101Google Scholar
  8. Lowe OS (1976) Non-photographic optical sensors. In: Lintz J Jr, Simonett OS (eds) Remote sensing environment. Addison-Wesley, Reading, US, pp 155–193Google Scholar
  9. Melen R, Buss D (eds) (1977) Charge-coupled devices: technology and applications. IEEE press, New York, p 415Google Scholar
  10. Petrie G, Stoney WE (2009) The current status and future direction of spaceborne remote sensing platforms and imaging systems. In: Jackson MW (ed) Earth observing platforms and sensors, manual of remote sensing 3rd ed. Vol. 1.1, Amer Soc Photog Remote Sens (ASPRS), Bethesda, Md., pp 387–447Google Scholar
  11. Ryerson RA, Morain SA, Budge AM, (eds) (1997) Earth Observing Platforms and Sensors (CD-ROM). Manual of Remote Sensing, 3rd edn., Am Soc Photogramm Engg Remote SensGoogle Scholar
  12. Silva LF (1978) Radiation and instrumentation in remote sensing. In: Swain PH, Davis SM (eds) Remote Sensing: the Quantitative Approach. McGraw Hill, New York, pp 21–135Google Scholar
  13. Slater PN (1980) Remote sensing -optics and optical systems. Addison Wesley, Reading, 575 pGoogle Scholar
  14. Slater PN (1985) Survey of multispeetral imaging systems for earth observations. Remote Sens Environ 17:85–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Thompson LL (1979) Remote sensing using solid state array technology. Photogram Eng Remote Sens 45:47–55Google Scholar
  16. Tracy RA, Noll RE (1979) User-oriented data processing considerations in linear array applications. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 45:57–61Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Formerly Professor, Earth Resources Technology, Department of Earth SciencesIndian Institute of Technology RoorkeeRoorkeeIndia

Personalised recommendations