Advertisement

F Diskussion und Fazit

  • Ulrich Frey
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Kapitel erfolgt eine Gesamtabschätzung der Bedeutung einzelner Faktoren auch in Hinblick auf die in der Literatur diskutierten Erfolgsfaktorenkataloge. Es wird deutlich, welche Faktoren sich als einflussreich und robust über mehrere Datensätze erweisen. Die Modelle erzielen hohe Varianzausschöpfungen von 81% für CPR, 62% für NIIS, 66% für IFRI und 44% für das Gesamtmodell.

Verwendete Literatur

  1. Aglionby J (2014) The governance of commons in national parks: Plurality and purpose. Newcastle University, NewcastleGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrawal A (2007) Forests. Governance, and sustainability: Common property theory and its contributions. Int J Commons 1(1):111–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agrawal A, Chhatre A (2006) Explaining success on the commons: Community forest governance in the Indian Himalaya. World Dev 34(1):149–166.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.07.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baland J-M, Platteau J-P (1996) Halting degradation of natural resources: Is there a role for rural communities? Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Birkhofer K, Diehl E, Andersson J, Ekroos J, Früh-Müller A, Machnikowski F, Mader VL, Nilsson L, Sasaki K, Rundlöf M, Wolters V, Smith HG (2015) Ecosystem services – Current challenges and opportunities for ecological research. Front Ecol Evol 2:413.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2014.00087 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brooks JS, Waylen KA, Borgerhoff Mulder M (2012) How national context, project design, and local community characteristics influence success in community-based conservation projects. P Natl Acad Sci USA 109(52):21265–21270.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1207141110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chaudhuri A (2011) Sustaining cooperation in laboratory public goods experiments: A selective survey of the literature. Exp Econ 14(1):47–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chhatre A, Agrawal A (2008) Forest commons and local enforcement. P Natl Acad Sci USA 105(36):13286–13291.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0803399105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cinner JE, McClanahan TR, MacNeil MA, Graham NA, Daw TM, Mukminin A, Feary DA, Rabearisoa AL, Wamukota A, Jiddawi N, Campbell SJ, Baird AH, Januchowski-Hartley FA, Hamed S, Lahari R, Morove T, Kuange J (2012) Comanagement of coral reef social-ecological systems. P Natl Acad Sci USA 109(14):5219–5222.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1121215109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cleaver F (2000) Moral ecological rationality. Institutions and the management of common property resources. Dev Change 31(2):361–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cox M, Arnold G, Villamayor Tomas S (2010) A review of design principles for community-based Natural Resource Management. Ecol Soc 15(4):38–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frey UJ, Cox M (2015) Building a diagnostic ontology of social-ecological systems. Int J Commons 9(2):595–618.  https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.505 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gruber E (2008) Key principles of community-based natural resource management: A synthesis and interpretation of identified effective approaches for managing the commons. Environ Manage 45:52–66CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gutiérrez NL, Hilborn R, Defeo O (2011) Leadership, social capital and incentives promote successful fisheries. Nature 470(7334):386–389.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09689 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hinkel J, Cox M, Schlüter M, Binder CR, Falk T (2015) A diagnostic procedure for applying the social-ecological systems framework in diverse cases. Ecol Soc 20(1):32.  https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07023-200132 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lam WF (1998) Governing irrigation systems in Nepal: Institutions, infrastructure, and collective action. Institute for Contemporary Studies, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  17. Ledyard JO (1995) Public goods: A survey of experimental research. In: Kagel JH, Roth AE (Hrsg) The handbook of experimental economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, S 111–194Google Scholar
  18. Nilsson T (2001) Management of Communal Grazing Land: A case study on institutions for collective action in Endabeg village, Tanzania. http://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/archive/00000961/00/WebThesis.pdf. Zugegriffen: 5. Februar 2009
  19. Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ostrom E (1992a) Crafting institutions for self-governing irrigation systems. Institute for Contemporary Studies, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  21. Ostrom E, Gardner R, Walker JM (1994) Rules, games, and common-pool resources. University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pagdee A, Kim Y-S, Daugherty PJ (2006) What makes community forest management successful: A meta-study from community forests throughout the world. Soc Natur Resour 19:33–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sala O, Van Vuuren D, Pereira H, Lodge D, Alder J, Cumming G, Dobson A, Wolters V, Xenopoulos M (2005). Biodiversity across scenarios. In Carpenter S, Pingali P, Bennett E, Zurek M (Hrsg) Ecosystems and human well-being: Scenarios, Bd 2. Island Press, Washington, S 375–440Google Scholar
  24. Salk C, Frey UJ, Rusch H (2014) Comparing forests across climates and biomes: Qualitative assessments, reference forests and regional intercomparisons. PLoS One 9(4):e94800.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094800 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Van Laerhoven F (2010) Governing community forests and the challenge of solving two-level collective action dilemmas—A large-N perspective. Global Environ Chang 20(3):539–546.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.04.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wade R (1992) Common-property resource management in South Indian Villages. In: Bromley DW, Feeny D, Peters P, Gilles JL, Oakerson RJ, Runge CF, Thomson JT (Hrsg) Making the commons work. Institute for Contemporary Studies, San Francisco, S 207–228Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ulrich Frey
    • 1
  1. 1.Technische ThermodynamikDeutsches Zentrum für Luft- und RaumfahrtStuttgartDeutschland

Personalised recommendations