Advertisement

Automated Rights Clearance Using Semantic Web Technologies: The DALICC Framework

  • Tassilo Pellegrini
  • Victor Mireles
  • Simon Steyskal
  • Oleksandra Panasiuk
  • Anna Fensel
  • Sabrina Kirrane
Chapter

Abstract

The creation of derivative data works, e.g. for purposes such as content creation, service delivery or process automation, is often accompanied by legal uncertainty about usage rights and high costs in the clearance of licensing issues. DALICC stands for Data Licenses Clearance Center. It supports legal experts, innovation managers and application developers in the legally secure reutilization of third party data and software. DALICC is a Semantic Web enabled software framework which allows the attaching of licenses in a machine readable format to a specific asset and supports the clearance of rights by providing the user with information about equivalence, similarity and compatibility between licenses if used in combination in a derivative work. In essence, DALICC helps to determine which information can be shared with whom, to what extent and under which conditions, thus lowering the costs of rights clearance and stimulating the data economy.

Notes

Acknowledgements

DALICC was funded by the Austrian Federal Ministry of Transport, Innovation and Technology (BMVIT) under the program “ICT of the Future” between November 2016 – October 2018. More information is available at https://iktderzukunft.at/en/ and https://dalicc.net/.

References

  1. 1.
    Archer P, Dekkers M, Goedertier S, Loutas N (2013). Study on business models for linked open government data. ISA programme by PwC EU Services. European Commission. See also https://www.w3.org/2013/share-psi/workshop/krems/papers/LinkedOpenGovernmentDataBusinessModel. Accessed 29 Nov 2017
  2. 2.
    Deloitte (2012) Open growth. Stimulating demand for open data in the UK. See also http://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/uk/Documents/deloitte-analytics/open-growth.pdf. Accessed 29 Nov 2017
  3. 3.
    ENISA (2013) Detect, SHARE, protect solutions for improving threat data exchange among CERTs, Oct 2013Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ermilov I, Pellegrini T (2015) Data licensing on the cloud: empirical insights and implications for linked data. ACM Press, pp 153–156.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2814864.2814878
  5. 5.
    European Commission (2014) Towards a thriving data-driven economy. Brussels, 2.7.2014, COM(2014) 442 finalGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Frangos J (2015) New transparency in licensing: overview of the licensing facilitation act. Informed Couns 6(1):2Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Frosterus M, Hyvönen E, Laitio J (2011) Creating and publishing semantic metadata about linked and open datasets. In: Wood D (ed) Linking government data. Springer, New York, pp 95–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    García R, Gil R (2009) Copyright licenses reasoning an OWL-DL ontology. In: Proceedings of the 2009 conference on law, ontologies and the semantic web: channelling the legal information flood. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 145–162Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    García R, Gil R, Delgado J (2004) Intellectual property rights management using a semantic web information system. In: Meersman R, Tari Z (eds) On the move to meaningful Internet systems 2004: CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE, vol 3290. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 689–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    García R, Gil R, Delgado J (2007) A web ontologies framework for digital rights management. Artif Intell Law 15(2):137–154.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-007-9032-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gebser M, Kaufmann B, Kaminski R, Ostrowski M, Schaub T, Schneider M (2011) Potassco: the potsdam answer set solving collection. AI Commun 24(2):107–124MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Governatori G, Lam H-P, Rotolo A, Villata S, Auguste Atemezing G, Gandon F (2014) LIVE: a tool for checking licenses compatibility between vocabularies and data, vol 1272. See also https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01076619. Accessed 29 Nov 2017
  13. 13.
    Granickas K (2013) Understanding the impact of releasing and re-using open government data. In: European Public Sector Information Platform. Topic report no. 2013/08. See also http://www.epsiplatform.eu/sites/default/files/2013-08-Open_Data_Impact.pdf. Accessed 29 Nov 2017
  14. 14.
    Guibault LM (2011) Open content licensing: from theory to practice. Amsterdam University Press, AmsterdamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hoffmann A, Schulz T, Zirfas J, Hoffmann H, Roßnagel A, Leimeister JM (2015) Legal compatibility as a characteristic of sociotechnical systems. Bus Inf Syst Eng 57(2):103–113.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-015-0373-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Houghton J (2011) The costs and benefits of data provision. Report to the Australian National Data Service. Centre for Strategic Economic Studies, Victoria UniversityGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hyland B, Wood D (2011) The joy of data – a cookbook for publishing linked government data on the web. In: Wood D (ed) Linking government data. Springer, New York, pp 3–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    IDC & Open Evidence (2013) European Data Market. SMART 2013/0063. See also https://drive.google.com/a/open-evidence.com/file/d/0B5Co3wBffnzhUTBQUklCS0VoRTg/view?pref=2&pli=1. Accessed 29 Nov 2017
  19. 19.
    Jain P, Hitzler P, Janowicz K, Venkatramani C (2013) There’s no money in linked data. http://knoesis.wright.edu/pascal/pub/nomoneylod.pdf. Accessed 29 Nov 2017
  20. 20.
    Kirrane S, Mileo A, Decker S (2015) Access control and the resource description framework: a survey. Semant Web J. See also http://www.semantic-web-journal.net/content/access-control-and-resource-description-framework-survey. Accessed 29 Nov 2017
  21. 21.
    OECD (2008) Intellectual assets and value creation. See also http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/40637101.pdf. Accessed 29 Nov 2017
  22. 22.
    Pellegrini T (2014) Linked Data Licensing – Datenlizenzierung unter netzökonomischen Bedingungen. In: Schweighöfer E et al (eds) Transparenz. 17. Int. Rechtsinformatik Symposium IRIS 2014. OCG Verlag, WienGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Polleres A, Wallner JP (2013) On the relation between SPARQL1. 1 and answer set programming. J Appl Non-Class Log 23(1–2):159–212MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Prenafeta J (2010) Protecting copyright through semantic technology. Publ Res Q 26(4):249–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pucella R, Weissman V (2002) A logic for reasoning about digital rights. In: Proceedings of the 15th IEEE workshop on Computer Security Foundations. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, pp 282–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rodriguez E, Delgado J, Boch L, Rodriguez-Doncel V (2015) Media contract formalization using a standardized contract expression language. IEEE Multimed 22(2):64–74.  https://doi.org/10.1109/MMUL.2014.22 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rodriguez-Doncel V, Delgado J (2009) A media value chain ontology for MPEG-21. IEEE Multimed 16(4):44–51.  https://doi.org/10.1109/MMUL.2009.78 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Roehring P, Pring B (2013) The value of signal and the cost of noise. Oxford Economics, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sande MS, Portier M, Mannens E, Van de Walle R (2012) Challenges for open data usage: open derivatives and licensing. https://www.w3.org/2012/06/pmod/pmod2012_submission_4.pdf. Accessed 12 Feb 2016
  30. 30.
    Sonntag M (2006) Rechtsschutz für Ontologien. In: e-Staat und e-Wirtschaft aus rechtlicher Sicht. Richard Boorberg Verlag, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Steyskal S, Polleres A (2015) Towards formal semantics for ODRL policies. In: Rule technologies: foundations, tools, and applications – 9th international symposium, RuleML 2015, Berlin, Germany, August 2–5, 2015, Proceedings, pp 360–375.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21542-6_23
  32. 32.
    Villata S, Gandon F (2012) Licenses compatibility and composition in the web of data. In: Third international workshop on consuming linked data (COLD 2012), Boston, Nov 2012, https://km.aifb.kit.edu/ws/cold2012/. hal-01171125
  33. 33.
    World Bank (2014) Open data for economic growth. See also http://www.worldbank.org/content/dam/Worldbank/document/Open-Data-for-Economic-Growth.pdf. Accessed 29 Nov 2017
  34. 34.
    Ball A (2014) How to license research data. A Digital Curation Centre and JISC Legal ‘working level’ guide. http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/how-guides/license-research-data. Accessed 29 Nov 2017.
  35. 35.
    Rotolo A, Villata S, Gandon F (2013) A deontic logic semantics for licenses composition in the web of data. In: Proceedings of the fourteenth international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ICAIL ’13. ACM, New York, pp 111–120.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2514601.2514614
  36. 36.
    Guido G, Ho-Pun L, Antonino R, Serena V, Fabien G (2013) Heuristics for licenses composition. Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications. pp 77–86.  https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-359-9-77
  37. 37.
    Cabrio E, Palmero Aprosio A, Villata S (2014) These are your rights. In: Presutti V, d’Amato C, Gandon F, d’Aquin M, Staab S, Tordai A (eds) The semantic web: trends and challenges. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 255–269Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tassilo Pellegrini
    • 1
  • Victor Mireles
    • 2
  • Simon Steyskal
    • 3
  • Oleksandra Panasiuk
    • 4
  • Anna Fensel
    • 4
  • Sabrina Kirrane
    • 5
  1. 1.University of Applied Sciences St. PöltenSt. PöltenAustria
  2. 2.Semantic Web Company GmbHWienAustria
  3. 3.Siemens AG ÖsterreichWienAustria
  4. 4.University of InnsbruckInnsbruckAustria
  5. 5.Vienna University of Economics and BusinessWienGermany

Personalised recommendations