Advertisement

Kapitel 7: Besondere Vermögenskategorien

  • Anja Höfelmeier
Chapter
Part of the Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht book series (BEITRÄGE, volume 271)

Zusammenfassung

In der internationalen Praxis sowie in den verschiedenen Kodifikationen zum Immunitätsrecht finden sich häufig bestimmte Kategorien staatlichen Vermögens, deren Immunität ohne Rückgriff auf die Unterscheidung zwischen hoheitlichem und nicht hoheitlichem Vermögen bestimmt oder deren Schutzwürdigkeit besonders betont wird.

Literatur- und Quellenverzeichnis

  1. Akande, Dapo/Shaw, Sangeeta, Immunities of State Officials, International Crimes, and Foreign Domestic Courts, (2010) 21 EJIL 815-852Google Scholar
  2. Albert, Michael, Völkerrechtliche Immunität ausländischer Staaten gegen Gerichtszwang, Berlin 1984Google Scholar
  3. van Alebeek, Rosanne, Immunity, Diplomatic, MPEPIL V, 2013, 98-110Google Scholar
  4. von Arnauld, Andreas, Völkerrecht, Heidelberg 2012Google Scholar
  5. Atkeson, Timothy/Perkins, Samuel/Wyatt, Michael, H.R.11315 – The Revised State-Justice Bill on Foreign Sovereign Immunity: Time for Action, (1976) 70 AJIL 298-321Google Scholar
  6. Bankas, Ernest K., The State Immunity Controversy in International Law: Private Suits Against Sovereign States in Domestic Courts, Berlin 2005Google Scholar
  7. Bartsch, Kerstin/Elberling, Björn, Jus Cogens vs. State Immunity, Round Two: The Decision of the European Court of Human Rights in the Kalogeropoulou v Greece & Germany Decision, (2003) 4 GLJ 477-491Google Scholar
  8. Belsky, Adam C./Merva, Mark/Roht-Arriaza, Naomi, Implied Waiver Under the FSIA: A Proposed Exception to Immunity for Violations of Peremptory Norms of International Law, (1989) 77 CLR 365-415Google Scholar
  9. Bernhardt, Rudolf (Hrsg.), Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Band 4, Amsterdam 2000Google Scholar
  10. Bianchi, Andrea, Denying State Immunity to Violators of Human Rights, (1994) 46 AJPIL 195-229Google Scholar
  11. Bleckmann, Albert, Analogie im Völkerrecht, (1977) 17 AVR 161-180Google Scholar
  12. Boguslavsky, Mark Moiseevich, Irina Shchukina’s Suit (On the Decision of a French Court), (1995) 4 IJCP 325-341Google Scholar
  13. Bouchez, Leo J., The Nature and Scope of State Immunity from Jurisdiction and Execution, (1979) 10 NYIL 3-33Google Scholar
  14. Buchsteiner, Jochen, Thailändisches Flugzeug konfisziert: Ein Balanceakt zwischen Berlin und Bangkok, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 14. Juli 2011 (abrufbar unter http://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/thailaendisches-flugzeug-konfisziert-ein-balanceakt-zwischen-berlin-und-bangkok-16548.html)
  15. Crawford, James, Execution of Judgments and Foreign Sovereign Immunity, (1981) 75 AJIL 820-869Google Scholar
  16. Dahm, Georg/Delbrück, Jost/Wolfrum, Rüdiger, Völkerrecht, 2. Auflage, Berlin, Band I/1 1988, Bd. I/2 2002Google Scholar
  17. Damian, Helmut, Staatenimmunität und Gerichtszwang, Berlin 1985Google Scholar
  18. Delaume, Georges R., The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act and Public Debt Litigation: Some Fifteen Years Later, (1994) 88 AJIL 257-279Google Scholar
  19. Fox, Hazel, Enforcement Jurisdiction, Foreign State Property and Diplomatic Immunity, (1985) 34 ICLQ 115-141Google Scholar
  20. Heintschel von Heinegg, Wolff, Warships, MPEPIL X, 2013, 790-802Google Scholar
  21. Herdegen, Matthias, The Abuse of Diplomatic Privileges and Countermeasures not Covered by the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations: Some Observations in the Light of Recent British Experience, (1986) 46 ZaöRV 734-757Google Scholar
  22. Herdegen, Matthias, Völkerrecht, 13. Auflage, München 2014Google Scholar
  23. Hertig Randall, Maya, Vienna Convention on the Representation of States in their Relations with International Organizations of a Universal Character (1975), MPEPIL X, 2013, 715-717Google Scholar
  24. Hess, Burkhard, The International Law Commission’s Draft Convention on the Jurisdictional Immunities of States and Their Property, (1993) 4 EJIL 269-283Google Scholar
  25. Hestermeyer, Holger P., Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961), MPEPIL X, 2013, 697-709Google Scholar
  26. Kalb, Nadia, Immunities, Special Missions, MPEPIL V, 2013, 94-98Google Scholar
  27. Kowalski, Michal, Consuls, MPEPIL II, 2013, 708-714Google Scholar
  28. Lee, Paul L., Central Banks and Sovereign Immunity, (2003) 41 Colum.J.Transnat'l L. 327-396Google Scholar
  29. Mann, Frederick Alexander, The State Immunity Act 1978, (1979) 50 BYIL 43-62Google Scholar
  30. Niboyet, Jean-Paulin, Immunité de juridiction et incompétence d’attribution, (1950) 39 Niboyet 139-158Google Scholar
  31. Patrikis, Ernest T., Foreign Central Bank Property: Immunity from Attachment in the United States, (1982) U.Ill.L.Rev. 265-287Google Scholar
  32. Paulus, Andreas L. / Dienelt, Anne, Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (1963), MPEPIL X, 2013, 683-697Google Scholar
  33. Reinisch, August, European Court Practice Concerning State Immunity from Enforcement Measures, (2006) 17 EJIL 803-836Google Scholar
  34. Ryngaert, Cedric, Embassy Bank Accounts and State Immunity from Execution: Doing Justice to the Financial Interests of Creditors, (2013) 26 LJIL 73-88Google Scholar
  35. Schwarzenberger, Georg, International Jus Cogens?, (1965) 43 Tex.L.Rev. 455-478Google Scholar
  36. Seidl-Hohenveldern, Ignaz, State Immunity: Federal Republic of Germany, (1979) 10 NYIL 55-72Google Scholar
  37. Weller, Matthias, Immunity for Artworks on Loan? A Review of International Customary Law and Municipal Anti-seizure Statutes in Light of the Liechtenstein Litigation, (2005) 38 Vand.J.Transnat'l L. 997-1093Google Scholar
  38. Wouters, Jan/Verhoeven, Sten, State Aircraft, MPEPIL IX, 2013, 484-489Google Scholar
  39. Zhu, Lijiang, State Immunity from Measures of Constraints for the Property of Foreign Central Banks: The Chinese Perspective, (2007) 6 Chinese JIL 67-81Google Scholar
  40. ITLOS, The “Ara Libertad” Case (Argentina v. Ghana), 15. Dezember 2012 (abrufbar unter http://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/cases/case_no.20/C20_Order _15.12.2012.corr.pdf)
  41. Cour d’appel de Bruxelles (BE), État d’Irak c. Vinci Constructions Grands Projets SA de droit français, 4. Oktober 2002, (2003) JT 318Google Scholar
  42. Cour d’appel de Bruxelles (BE), Leica AG c. Central Bank of Iraq et État irakien, 15. Februar 2000, (2001) JT 6Google Scholar
  43. Cour d’appel de Bruxelles (BE), Szczesniak c. Backer et consorts, 14. Juli 1955, Pasicrisie Belge 1957, II, 38Google Scholar
  44. OLG Frankfurt, 22. September 1987, NJW-RR 1988, 682Google Scholar
  45. Cour de Cassation (FR), Société NML Capital c. République argentine, 28. März 2013, No. 394, 395, 396, ECLI:FR:CCASS:2013:C100394/395/396Google Scholar
  46. Oberster Gerichtshof (AT), L.-W. Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG g. D.V.A., 30. April 1986, Az. 3 Ob 38/86Google Scholar
  47. Oberster Gerichtshof (AT), Neustein g. Republik Indonesien, 6. August 1958, Az. 6 Ob 126/58Google Scholar
  48. Bundesgericht (CH), Sozialistische Libysche Arabische Volks-Jamahiriya g. Actimon SA, 24. April 1985, BGE 111 Ia 62Google Scholar
  49. Audiencia Provincial de Cádiz (ES), State Marine Corp. and Currence v. United States of America, 25. Juni 1999, (2004) 128 ILR 701Google Scholar
  50. Cour de Cassation (TR), Société X c. États-Unis d’Amérique, 11. Juni 1993, in Hafner/Kohen/Breau (Hrsg.), State Practice, 2006, 675Google Scholar
  51. Court of Appeal (UK), Hispano Americana Mercantil S.A. v. Central Bank of Nigeria, 25. April 1979, (1979) 2 Lloyd’s Rep 277Google Scholar
  52. Court of Appeal (UK), Trendtex Trading Corporation v. Central Bank of Nigeria, 13. Januar 1977, (1977) 2 WLR 356Google Scholar
  53. House of Lords (UK), Alcom Ltd. v. Republic of Colombia et al., 12. April 1984, (1984) 2 All ER 6Google Scholar
  54. Court of Appeals (US), Af-Cap Inc. v. Chevron Overseas (Congo) Ltd., 3. April 2006, 475 F.3d 1080Google Scholar
  55. Court of Appeals (US), Connecticut Bank of Commerce v. Republic of Congo, 29. August 2002, 309 F.3d 240Google Scholar
  56. Court of Appeals (US), Jenny Rubin v. Islamic Republic of Iran, 27. Februar 2013, No. 11-2144Google Scholar
  57. District Court of Florida, S. D. (US), All American Trading Corp. v. Cuartel General Fuerza Aerea Guardia Nacional de Nicaragua, 7. April 1993, 818 F.Supp. 1552Google Scholar
  58. District Court of Maine (US), Aero Union Corporation v. Aircraft Deconstructors International LLC, 24. August 2012, No. 1:11-cv-00484Google Scholar
  59. District Court of Massachusetts (US), Jenny Rubin v. Islamic Republic of Iran, 3. August 2006, 456 F.Supp.2d 228Google Scholar
  60. District Court of New Jersey (US), Behring International, Inc. v. Imperial Iranian Air Force, 24. Juli 1979, 475 F.Supp. 383Google Scholar
  61. District Court of New York, S. D. (US), Liberian Eastern Timber Corporation v. Government of the Republic of Liberia, 12. Dezember 1986, 650 F.Supp. 73Google Scholar
  62. District Court of New York, S. D. (US), Weston Compagnie de Finance et d’Investissement, S.A. v. La Republica del Ecuador, 14. Juli 1993, 823 F.Supp. 1106Google Scholar
  63. Protection of Movable Cultural Heritage Act 1986 (AU), Act No. 11 of 1986, No. C2012C00239Google Scholar
  64. Code Judiciaire (BE), 14. Juni 2004Google Scholar
  65. Kulturgütertransfergesetz (CH), 20. Juni 2003, AS 2005 1869, 444.1Google Scholar
  66. Law of the People's Republic of China on Judicial Immunity from Compulsory Measures Concerning the Property of Foreign Central Banks (CN), 25. Oktober 2005 (abrufbar unter http://www.npc.gov.cn/englishnpc/Law/2007-12/13/content_1384123.htm)
  67. Loi No. 94-679 (FR), 10. August 1994, 184 JORF 11668Google Scholar
  68. UNESCO, Recommendation concerning the International Exchange of Cultural Property, 26. November 1976, Records of the General Conference, 19th Sess., Vol. 1, Annex IGoogle Scholar
  69. UN ILC, Consular Intercourse and Immunities: Report by Jaroslav Zourek, Special Rapporteur, 15. April 1957, UN Doc. A/CN.4/108Google Scholar
  70. UN ILC, Seventh Report on Jurisdictional Immunities of States and their Property, by Mr. Sompong Sucharitkul, Special Rapporteur, 28. März 1985, UN Doc. A/CN.4/388Google Scholar
  71. UN ILC, Second Report on Jurisdictional Immunities of States and their Property, by Mr. Motoo Ogiso, Special Rapporteur, 11. April 1989, UN Doc. A/CN.4/422Google Scholar
  72. Chambre des Représentants de Belgique (BE), Projet de loi modifiant le Code judiciaire en vue d’instituer une immunité d’exécution à l’égard des biens culturels étrangers exposés publiquement en Belgique, 27. April 2004, Doc. 51 1051/001Google Scholar
  73. Bundesrat (CH), Botschaft über die UNESCO-Konvention 1970 und das Bundesgesetz über den internationalen Kulturgütertransfer (KGTG), 21. November 2001, (2002) BBl 535Google Scholar
  74. Bundesrat (CH), Pressemitteilung, 16. November 2005 (abrufbar unter http://www.admin.ch/aktuell/00089/index.html?lang=de&msg-id=21834)
  75. Departement für auswärtige Angelegenheiten (CH), Direktion für Völkerrecht, Stellungnahme vom 26. Oktober 1984, (1985) 41 SchwJbIR 178Google Scholar
  76. Congress, House of Representatives (US) (94th Congress 2nd Session), Report No. 94-1487: Congressional Committee Report on the Jurisdiction of United States Courts in Suits against Foreign States, 9. September 1976, (1976) 15 ILM 1398Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften e.V., to be exercised by Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, Heidelberg 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anja Höfelmeier
    • 1
  1. 1.CuxhavenDeutschland

Personalised recommendations