Advertisement

Qualitativ-naturalistische Forschung als Zugang zur Entwicklung, Analyse und Evaluation sprachtherapeutischer Interventionen

  • Hilke Hansen
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Im Mittelpunkt dieses Beitrags stehen die spezifischen Leistungen und Möglichkeiten qualitativ-naturalistischer Sozialforschung in der Erforschung von Kommunikation, ihren Störungen und deren Veränderung durch sprachtherapeutische Interventionen. Illustriert durch ausgewählte Beispielstudien werden vier Themenschwerpunkte qualitativer Sprachtherapieforschung – Leben mit kommunikativ-sprachlichen Beeinträchtigungen, ungestörte und beeinträchtigte Alltagskommunikation, Interaktion im Therapiealltag, Prozess- und Ergebnisevaluation – vorgestellt. Der Fokus der Diskussion liegt auf der Bedeutung und den Potenzialen des qualitativen Forschungsstils für die Entwicklung, Analyse und Evaluation sprachtherapeutischer Interventionen.

Literatur

  1. Auer P (2014) The Limits of Collaboration – Speakership in Conversation with Persons with Aphasia. In: Ball MJ, Müller N, Nelson RL (Hrsg) Handbook of Qualitative Research in Communication Disorders. Psychology Press, New York, S 187–206Google Scholar
  2. Ball MJ, Müller N, Nelson RL (Hrsg) (2014) Handbook of Qualitative Research in Communication Disorders. Psychology Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrow R (2008) Listening to the voice of living life with aphasia: Anne's story. Int J of Lang Comm Disord 43 Suppl 1: 30–46.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820701697947 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barrow R (2011) Shaping practice: The benefits of really attending to the person's story. In: Fourie RJ (Hrsg) Therapeutic processes for communication disorders. A guide for clinicians and students. Psychology Press, Hove, S 21–43Google Scholar
  5. Bauer A (2009) Miteinander im Gespräch bleiben; Partizipation in aphasischen Alltagsgesprächen. Verl. für Gesprächsforschung, MannheimGoogle Scholar
  6. Bauer A (2015) Das Miteinander im Gespräch bleiben – Partizipation in aphasischen Familiengesprächen. Sprache Stimme Gehör 39: 129–133.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s–0035–1559596 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bauer A, Auer P, Lucius-Hoene G (2009) Aphasie im Alltag. Thieme, StuttgartCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baylor C, Burns M, Eadie T, Britton D, Yorkston K (2011) A Qualitative Study of Interference With Communicative Participation Across Communication Disorders in Adults. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 20: 269.  https://doi.org/10.1044/1058–0360(2011/10–0084) CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Beckley F, Best W, Johnson F, Edwards S, Maxim J, Beeke S (2013) Conversation therapy for agrammatism: exploring the therapeutic process of engagement and learning by a person with aphasia. Int J of Lang Comm Disord 48: 220–239.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460–6984.2012.00204.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bloch S, Wilkinson R (2004) The Understandability of AAC; A Conversation Analysis Study of Acquired Dysarthria. Augmen Altern Comm 20: 272–282.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610400005614 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bloch S, Wilkinson R (2011) Acquired dysarthria in conversation: methods of resolving understandability problems. Int J of Lang Comm Disord 46: 510–523.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460–6984.2011.00076.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Booth S, Perkins L (2010) The use of conversation analysis to guide individualized advice to carers and evaluate change in aphasia; A case study. Aphasiology 13: 283–303.  https://doi.org/10.1080/026870399402109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chapey R, Duchan JF, Elman RGarcia LJ, Kagan A, Lyon JG, Simmons-Mackie N (2000) Life Participation Approach to Aphasia: A Statement of Values for the Future. www.aphasia.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/LPAA_AI.pdf. Zugegriffen: 22. September 2016
  14. Corcoran JA, Stewart M (1998) Stories of stuttering, a qualitative analysis of interview narratives. J Fluency Disord 23: 247–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Corsten S, Hardering F (2015) Biographisch-narrative Intervention bei Aphasie; Sprachtherapie aktuell: Schwerpunktthema: Aus der Praxis für die Praxis 2: 1–15Google Scholar
  16. Creswell JW (2009) Qualitative inquiry and research design; Choosing among five approaches. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  17. Damico JS, Augustine LE (1995) Social considerations in the labeling of students as attention deficit hyperactivity disordered. Semin Speech Lang 16: 259–274CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Damico JS, Simmons-Mackie N, Oelschlaeger M, Elman R, Armstrong E (1999) Qualitative methods in aphasia research; Basic issues. Aphasiology 13: 651–665.  https://doi.org/10.1080/026870399401768 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Damico JS, Simmons-Mackie NN (2003) Qualitative Research and Speech-Language Pathology: A Tutorial for the Clinical Realm. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 12: 131–143.  https://doi.org/10.1044/1058–0360(2003/060) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Davidson BJ, McAllister L (2002) An introduction to qualitative research approaches. Acquiring Knowledge in Speech, Language and Hearing 4: 28–31Google Scholar
  21. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (Hrsg) (2011) The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage, Los Angeles, CalifGoogle Scholar
  22. DIMDI (2005) ICF (Internationale Klassifikation der Funktionsfähigkeit, Behinderung und Gesundheit); Stand Oktober 2005. http://www.dimdi.de/dynamic/de/klassi/downloadcenter/icf/endfassung. Zugegriffen: 17. Januar 2017
  23. Duchan JF (2001) Impairment and Social Views of Speech-Language Pathology; Clinical Practices Re-Examined. Adv Speech Lang Pathol 3: 37–45.  https://doi.org/10.3109/14417040109003707 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Duchan JF (2014) Case Studies and Their Frameworks. Positivist, Interpretive, and Emancipatory. In: Ball MJ, Müller N, Nelson RL (Hrsg) Handbook of Qualitative Research in Communication Disorders. Psychology Press, New York, S 3–16Google Scholar
  25. Ewers M, Grewe T, Höppner H, Huber W, Sayn-Wittgenstein F, Stemmer R, Voigt-Radloff S, Walkenhorst U (2012) Forschung in den Gesundheitsfachberufen. Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) 137 Suppl 2.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s–0032–1305067
  26. Ferguson A, Armstrong E (2004) Reflections on speech-language therapists' talk: implications for clinical practice and education. Int J of Lang Comm Disord 39: 469–77; discussion 477–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Flick U (2002) Interviews in der Gesundheits- und Pflegeforschung: Wege zur Herstellung und Verwendung verbaler Daten. In: Schaeffer D, Müller-Mundt G (Hrsg) Qualitative Gesundheits- und Pflegeforschung. Huber, Bern, S 203–220Google Scholar
  28. Fourie R (2009) Qualitative study of the therapeutic relationship in speech and language therapy; Perspectives of adults with acquired communication and swallowing disorders. Int J of Lang Comm Disord 44: 979–999.  https://doi.org/10.3109/13682820802535285 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fourie R, Crowley N, Oliviera A (2011) A Qualitative Exploration of Therapeutic Relationships from the Perspective of Six Children Receiving Speech-Language Therapy. Top Lang Disord 31: 310–324.  https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0b013e3182353f00 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fraas MR, Calvert M (2009) The Use of Narratives to Identify Characteristics Leading to a Productive Life Following Acquired Brain Injury. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 18: 315–328.  https://doi.org/10.1044/1058–0360(2009/08–0008) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Göldner J (im Druck) Die Beziehung zwischen erwachsenem Patient und Therapeutin in der Sprachtherapie – eine Auseinandersetzung mit Konzepten und Wirkfaktoren im Spiegel der psychotherapeutischen Diskussion. Schulz-Kirchner, IdsteinGoogle Scholar
  32. Hansen H (2009) Therapiearbeit; Eine qualitative Untersuchung der Arbeitstypen und Arbeitsmuster ambulanter logopädischer Therapieprozesse. Schulz-Kirchner, IdsteinGoogle Scholar
  33. Hansen H (2014a) Das Arbeitstypen-Modell in der Logopädieausbildung: Erste Erfahrungen und Ansätze. Therapie Lernen 3: 6–14Google Scholar
  34. Hansen H (2014b) Qualitative studies investigating the effectiveness of stroke rehabilitation – methodological approaches and perspectives / Qualitative Studien zur Wirkung therapeutischer Interventionen – methodische Zugänge und Perspektiven am Beispiel Schlaganfallrehabilitation. IJHP 1: 20–33.  https://doi.org/10.2478/ijhp–2014–0005 Google Scholar
  35. Hansen H, Schneider B (2015) Qualitative Ansätze in der teilhabeorientierten Aphasie-Diagnostik: Kennzeichen und Anwendungen. Aphasie und verwandte Gebiete 1: 3–12Google Scholar
  36. Hersh D (2009) How do people with aphasia view their discharge from therapy? Aphasiology 23: 331–350.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030701764220 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hersh D, Armstrong E (2014) Grounded Theory ind Speech-Language Pathology. In: Ball MJ, Müller N, Nelson RL (Hrsg) Handbook of Qualitative Research in Communication Disorders. Psychology Press, New York, S 113–130Google Scholar
  38. Horton S (2007) Topic generation in aphasia language therapy sessions; Issues of identity. Aphasiology 21: 283–298.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030600911377 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kagan A, Simmons-Mackie N, Rowland A, Huijbregts M, Shumway E, McEwen S, Threats T, Sharp S (2008) Counting what counts; A framework for capturing real‐life outcomes of aphasia intervention. Aphasiology 22: 258–280.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030701282595 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kelle U (2006) Qualitative Evaluationsforschung und das Kausalitätsparadigma. In: Flick U (Hrsg) Qualitative Evaluationsforschung. Konzepte – Methoden – Umsetzung. Rowohlt-Taschenbuch, Reinbek bei Hamburg, S 117–134Google Scholar
  41. Kohler J (2016) Zur Bedeutung qualitativer Studien. In: Grohnfeldt M (Hrsg) Kompendium der akademischen Sprachtherapie und Logopädie, Bd 1. W. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart, S 77–95Google Scholar
  42. Kovarsky D (2008) Representing voices from the life-world in evidence-based practice. Int J of Lang Comm Disord 43 Suppl 1: 47–57.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820701698036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kovarsky D (2014) The Ethnography of Communication Revisited. In: Ball MJ, Müller N, Nelson RL (Hrsg) Handbook of Qualitative Research in Communication Disorders. Psychology Press, New York, S 55–78Google Scholar
  44. Kovarsky D, Duchan JF (1997) The Interactional Dimensions of Language Therapy. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 28: 297–307.  https://doi.org/10.1044/0161–1461.2803.297 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kovarsky D, Shaw A, Adingono-Smith M (2007) The construction of identity during group therapy among adults with traumatic brain injury. Comm Med 4: 53–66.  https://doi.org/10.1515/CAM.2007.029 Google Scholar
  46. Kowarsky D, Maxwell MM (1992) Ethnography and the clinical setting: Communicative expectancies in clinical discourse. Top Lang Disord 12: 76–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Leahy MM (2004) Therapy talk: analyzing therapeutic discourse. Language, speech, and hearing services in schools 35: 70–81CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Leahy MM, Walsh IP (2008) Talk in Interaction in the Speech-Language Pathology Clinic. Topics in Language Disorders 28: 229–241.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.TLD.0000333598.53339.5a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Markham C, van Laar D, Gibbard D, Dean T (2009) Children with speech, language and communication needs: their perceptions of their quality of life. Int J of Lang Comm Disord 44: 748–768.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820802359892 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Medical Research Council (2008) Developing and evaluating complex interventions: New guidance. https://www.mrc.ac.uk/documents/pdf/complex-interventions-guidance/. Zugegriffen: 12. Oktober 2014
  51. Merrick R, Roulstone S (2011) Children's views of communication and speech-language pathology. International journal of speech-language pathology 13: 281–290.  https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2011.577809 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Milroy L, Perkins L (1992) Repair strategies in aphasic discourse; towards a collaborative model. Clinical linguistics and Phonetics 6: 27–40.  https://doi.org/10.3109/02699209208985517 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Morse JM (2012) Qualitative health research; Creating a new discipline. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CalifGoogle Scholar
  54. Nelson RL, Abendroth K, Lynch K (2014) Ethnography. In: Ball MJ, Müller N, Nelson RL (Hrsg) Handbook of Qualitative Research in Communication Disorders. Psychology Press, New York, S 39–53Google Scholar
  55. Nicholas DB, Zwaigenbaum L, Ing S, MacCulloch R, Roberts W, McKeever, P, McMorris (2016) „Live It to Unterstand It”: The Experiences of Mothers of Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder. Qual Health Res 26: 921–934CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Parr S (2007) Living with severe aphasia; Tracking social exclusion. Aphasiology 21: 98–123.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030600798337 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Parr S, Byng S, Gilpin S, Ireland C (1998) Talking about aphasia; Living with loss of language after stroke. Open University Press, Buckingham, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  58. Pfammatter M, Junghan UM, Tschacher W (2012) Allgemeine Wirkfaktoren der Psychotherapie: Konzepte, Widersprüche und eine Synthese. Psychotherapie in Psychiatrie, Psychotherapeutischer Medizin und Klinischer Psychologie 17: 17–31Google Scholar
  59. Pound C, Parr S, Duchan J (2001) Using partners' autobiographical reports to develop, deliver, and evaluate services in aphasia. Aphasiology 15: 477–493.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02687040143000159 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Robillard AB (1999) Meaning of a disability; The lived experience of paralysis. Temple Univ. Press, Philadelphia, PaGoogle Scholar
  61. Sackett DL, Wennberg JE (1997) Choosing the best research design for each question; It's time to stop squabbling over the „best” methods. BMJ 315: 1636CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Scheffner Hammer C (2014) „Life Is Hard But I'm Trying“: Understanding the Lives of the Families Speech-Language Pathologists Serve. In: Ball MJ, Müller N, Nelson RL (Hrsg) Handbook of Qualitative Research in Communication Disorders. Psychology Press, New York, S 207–218Google Scholar
  63. Shadden BB, Hagstrom F, Koski PR (2008) Neurogenic Communication Disorders; Life Stories and the Narrative Self. Plural Publishing Inc, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  64. Simmons-Mackie N, Damico J (1996) Accounting for handicaps in aphasia: communicative assessment from an authentic social perspective. Disabil Rehabil 18: 540–549CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Simmons-Mackie N, Damico JS (2001) Intervention Outcomes: A Clinical Application of Qualitative Methods. Top Lang Disord 21: 21–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Simmons-Mackie N, Damico JS (2008) Exposed and embedded corrections in aphasia therapy: issues of voice and identity. Int J of Lang Comm Disord 43 Suppl 1: 5–17.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820701697889 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Simmons-Mackie N, Damico JS (2009) Engagement in Group Therapy for Aphasia. Semin Speech Lang 30: 18–26CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Simmons-Mackie N, Damico JS (2011) Exploring clinical interaction in speech-language therapy. In: Fourie RJ (Hrsg) Therapeutic processes for communication disorders. A guide for clinicians and students. Psychology Press, Hove, S 34–52Google Scholar
  69. Simmons-Mackie N, Damico JS, Damico HL (1999) A Qualitative Study of Feedback in Aphasia Treatment. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 8: 218–230.  https://doi.org/10.1044/1058–0360.0803.218 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Simmons-Mackie N, Elman R, Holland AL, Damico JS (2007a) Management of Discourse in Group Therapy for Aphasia. Top Lang Disord 27: 5–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Simmons-Mackie N, Elman RJ (2011) Negotiation of identity in group therapy for aphasia: the Aphasia Cafe. Int J of Lang Comm Disord 46: 312–323.  https://doi.org/10.3109/13682822.2010.507616 Google Scholar
  72. Simmons-Mackie NN, Damico JS (2003) Contributions of Qualitative Research to the Knowledge Base of Normal Communication. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 12: 144–154.  https://doi.org/10.1044/1058–0360(2003/061) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Simmons‐Mackie NN, Kagan A, O'Neill Christie C, Huijbregts M, McEwen S, Willems J (2007b) Communicative access and decision making for people with aphasia; Implementing sustainable healthcare systems change. Aphasiology 21: 39–66.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030600798287 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Starks H, Trinidad SB (2007) Choose your method: a comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis, and grounded theory. Qual Health Res 17: 1372–1380.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732307307031 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Strauss A, Fagerhaugh S, Suczek B, Wiener C (1985) Social organization of medical work. Univ. of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  76. Strauss AL, Corbin J (1996) Grounded Theory: Grundlagen Qualitativer Sozialforschung. Psychologie Verlags Union, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  77. Tetnowski JA, Damico JS (2001) A demonstration of the advantages of qualitative methodologies in stuttering research. Disorders. J Fluency Disord 26: 17–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Walsh IP (2007) Small Talk Is „Big Talk” in Clinical Discourse. Top Lang Disord 27: 24–36.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00011363–200701000–00004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wampold BE (2015) How important are the common factors in psychotherapy? An update. World Psychiatry 14: 270–277.  https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20238 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  80. Wilkinson R (2014) Conversation Analysis. In: Ball MJ, Müller N, Nelson RL (Hrsg) Handbook of Qualitative Research in Communication Disorders. Psychology Press, New York, S 79–92Google Scholar
  81. Wilkinson R, Bryan K, Lock S, Sage K (2010) Implementing and evaluating aphasia therapy targeted at couples' conversations; A single case study. Aphasiology 24: 869–886.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030903501958 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hochschule OsnabrückUniversity of Applied SciencesOsnabrückDeutschland

Personalised recommendations