Article 26

Pacta sunt servanda
  • Kirsten Schmalenbach
Chapter

Abstract

Art 26 restates the pillar of treaty law and the pivotal key to international law: pacta sunt servanda. Considering its significance, the provision is not too prominently placed in Part III of the Convention. The Preamble, after all, highlights pacta sunt servanda by aligning the principle with two others basic corner stones of treaty law: free consent and good faith (3rd recital). Rephrasing the principle pacta sunt servanda in Art 26 is first and foremost of symbolic significance. As Verdross rightly stresses, the binding force of international treaties has logical priority to any particular treaty and thus cannot itself be the legal consequence of a treaty such as the VCLT.

References

  1. Abbott KW (1999) International Relations Theory, International Law, and the Regime Governing Atrocities in Internal Conflicts. AJIL 93(2):361–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amerashinge CF (1991) Liability to Third Parties of Member States of International Organizations: Practice, Principle and Judicial Precedent. AJIL 85(2):259–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anzilotti D (1928) Corso di diritto internazionale, 3rd edn. Atheneum, RomeGoogle Scholar
  4. Armstrong D, Farrell T, Lambert H (2012) International Law and International Relations. CUP, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Basdevant J (1936) Règles générales du droit de la paix. RdC 58(3):471–715Google Scholar
  6. Bastid S (1985) Les traités dans la vie internationale. Economica, ParisGoogle Scholar
  7. Binder C (2008) The pacta sunt servanda rule in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Pillar and Its Safeguards. In: Buffard I, Crawford J, Pellet A, Wittich S (eds) International Law between Universalism and Fragmentation: Festschrift in Honour of Gerhard Hafner. Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden, pp 317–341Google Scholar
  8. Binder C (2012) Stability and Change in Times of Fragementation: The Limits of pacta sunt servanda Revisited. LJIL 25:909–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bluntschli JC (1881) Le droit international codifié. Guillamin, ParisGoogle Scholar
  10. Borchard EM (1926) Governmental Responsibility in Tort, VI. Yale LJ 36(1):1–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bourquin M (1931) Règles générales du droit de la paix. RdC 35(1):1–232Google Scholar
  12. Boyle J (1985) Ideals and Things: International Legal Scholarship and the Prison-House of Language. HarvILJ 26(2):327–360Google Scholar
  13. Brierly JL (1928) Le fondement du caractère obligatoire du droit international. RdC 23(4):463–592Google Scholar
  14. Brierly JL (1963) The Law of Nations: An Introduction to the International Law of Peace, 6th edn. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  15. Burgstaller M (2005) Theories of Compliance with International Law. Nijhoff, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  16. Chailley P (1932) La nature juridique des traités internationaux selon le droit contemporain. Sirey, ParisGoogle Scholar
  17. Chaumont C (1970) Cours général de droit international public. RdC 129(5):333–546Google Scholar
  18. Chayes A, Handler Chayes A (1995) The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Cheng B (1953) General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals. Stevens, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Collinet P (1932) The Evolution of Contract as Illustrating the General Evolution of Roman Law. LQR 48(4):488–494Google Scholar
  21. Dahm G (1958) Völkerrecht, Vol 1. Kohlhammer, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  22. Dahm G, Delbrück J, Wolfrum R (1989) Völkerrecht Band I/1, 2nd edn. De Gruyter, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  23. Dahm G, Delbrück J, Wolfrum R (2002) Völkerrecht Band I/3, 2nd edn. De Gruyter, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  24. Doehring K (2004) Völkerrecht: Ein Lehrbuch, 2nd edn. Müller, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  25. Duguit L (1917) The Law and the State. HarvLR 31(1):1–185Google Scholar
  26. Dupuy RJ (1973) L’application des règles du droit international général des traités aux accords conclus par les organisations internationales, Rapport provisoire et projet d’articles. AnnIDI 55:214–415Google Scholar
  27. Eeckhout P (2004) External Relations of the European Union: Legal and Constitutional Foundations. OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  28. Elias OA, Lim CL (1998) The Paradox of Consensualism in International Law. Kluwer Law International, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  29. Falk RA (1967) New Approaches to the Study of International Law. AJIL 61(2):477–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fiore P (1890) Il diritto internazionale codificato e la sua sanzione giuridica. Unione Tipografico Editrice, RomeGoogle Scholar
  31. Fitzmaurice M, Elias O (2005) Contemporary Issues in the Law of Treaties. Eleven, UtrechtGoogle Scholar
  32. Franck TM (1988) Legitimacy in the International System. AJIL 82(4):705–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Franck TM (1990) The Power of Legitimacy Among Nations. OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  34. Frowein JA (2008) Obligations erga omnes. In: Wolfrum R (ed) The Max Planck encyclopedia of public international law. OUP, Oxford. http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1400. Accessed 29 November 2017Google Scholar
  35. Fulda CB (2002) Demokratie und pacta sunt servanda. Books on Demand, NorderstedtGoogle Scholar
  36. Gaja G (1983) The European Community’s Rights and Obligations under Mixed Agreements. In: O’Keeffe D, Schermers HG (eds) Mixed Agreements. Kluwer, Deventer, pp 133–140Google Scholar
  37. Gentili A (1612) De jure belli libri tres. In: Holland TE (ed) Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  38. Goldsmith JL, Posner EA (2003) International Agreements: A Rational Choice Approach. VaJIL 44(1):113–144Google Scholar
  39. Gormley WP (1970) The Codification of pacta sunt servanda by the International Law Commission: The Preservation of Classical Norms of Moral Force and Good Faith. SLULJ 14(3):367–428Google Scholar
  40. Grotius H (1646/1964 II) De jure belli ac pacis libri tres. Scott JB (ed) The Law of War and Peace, Vol 2, book II. Oceana Publications, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. Guggenheim P (1967) Traité de droit international public: Avec mention de la pratique internationale et suisse, Vol 1. Librairie de l'Université, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  42. Hart HLA (1961) The Concept of Law. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  43. Hartwig M (1993) Die Haftung der Mitgliedstaaten für Internationale Organisationen. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hector P (1992) Das völkerrechtliche Abwägungsgebot. Duncker & Humblot, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  45. Heffter AW (1844) Das europäische Völkerrecht der Gegenwart: Auf den bisherigen Grundlagen. Schröder, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  46. Hegel GWF (1820) Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts. Nicolai, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  47. Henkin L (1995) International Law: Politics and Values. Nijhoff, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  48. Hirobe K (1993) Article 98 Paragraph 2 of the Constitution of Japan and the Domestic Effects of Resolutions of the United Nations Security Council. JAIL 36:17–32Google Scholar
  49. Hostie J (1932) Examen de quelques règles du droit international dans le domaine des communications et du transit. RdC 40(6):397–524Google Scholar
  50. Hyland R (1994) Pacta sunt servanda: A Mediation. VaJIL 34:405–433Google Scholar
  51. Jellinek G (1880) Die rechtliche Natur der Staatsverträge. Hölder, WienGoogle Scholar
  52. Jellinek G (1887) Gesetz und Verordnung: Staatsrechtliche Untersuchungen auf rechtsgeschichtlicher und rechtsvergleichender Grundlage. Mohr, TübingenGoogle Scholar
  53. Jennings R, Watts A (eds) (1992) Oppenheim’s International Law, Vol I. Longman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  54. Jinks D (2005) The Applicability of the Geneva Convention to the “global war on terrorism”. VaJIL 46(1):165–196Google Scholar
  55. Kaddous C (1998) Le droit des relations extérieures dans la jurisprudence de la Cour de Justice des Communautés européennes. Schulthess, ZurichGoogle Scholar
  56. Kelsen H (1920) Das Problem der Souveränität und die Theorie des Völkerrechts: Beitrag zu einer reinen Rechtslehre. Mohr, TübingenGoogle Scholar
  57. Kelsen H (1926) Les rapports de système entre le droit interne et le droit international public. RdC 14(3):227–331Google Scholar
  58. Kelsen H (1945) General Theory of Law and State. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  59. Kelsen H (1953) Théorie du droit international public. RdC 84(1):1–203Google Scholar
  60. Kelsen H (1957) What Is the Reason for the Validity of Law? In: Constantopoulos DS, Eustathiades CT, Fragistas CN (eds) Grundprobleme des internationalen Rechts: Festschrift für Jean Spiropoulos. Schimmelbusch, Bonn, pp 257–263Google Scholar
  61. Kelsen H (1966) Principles of International Law. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  62. Kennedy D (1988–1989) A New Stream of International Law Scholarship. WisILJ 7(1):1–50Google Scholar
  63. Kho HH (1997) Why Do Nations Obey International Law? Yale LJ 106(8):2599–2660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Kischel U (1992) State Contracts, Völker-, schieds- und internationalprivatrechtliche Aspekte des anwendbaren Rechts. Boorberg, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  65. Köck H (1977) Völkerrechtliche Verträge im Recht der Europäischen Gemeinschaften: Abschlußkompetenzen, Bindungswirkung, Kollisionen. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  66. Kolb R (2000) La bonne foi en droit international public: contribution à l’étude des principes généraux de droit. Graduate Institute Publications, GenevaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Kunz JL (1945) The Meaning and the Range of the Norm pacta sunt servanda. AJIL 39(2):180–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Lachs M (1997) Pacta sunt servanda. In: Bernhardt R (ed) EPIL, Vol III. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 847–854Google Scholar
  69. Lankarani El-Zein L (2001) Les contrats d’État à l’épreuve du droit international. Bruylant, BruxellesGoogle Scholar
  70. Lasswell HD, MacDoughal MS (1959) The Identification and Appraisal of Diverse Systems of Public Order. AJIL 53(1):1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Lauterpacht H (1927) Private Law Sources and Analogies of International Law. Longmans, Green and Co, LondonGoogle Scholar
  72. Lauterpacht H (1932) The Nature of International Law and General Jurisprudence. Economica 12:301–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Lauterpacht H (1933) The Function of Law in the International Community. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  74. Lavalle R (1982) About the Alleged Customary Law Nature of the Rule pacta sunt servanda. ZÖR 33:9–28Google Scholar
  75. La Fontaine H (ed) (1902) Pasicrisie internationale: historie documentaire des arbitrages internationaux. Stämpfli, BernGoogle Scholar
  76. Leben C (2003) La théorie du contrat d’Etat et l’évolution du droit international des investissements. RdC 302(2):197–386Google Scholar
  77. Lekkas S, Tzanakopoulos A (2014) Pacta sunt servanda versus Flexibility in the Suspension and Termination of Treaties. In: Tams CJ, Tzanakopoulos A, Zimmermann A (eds) Research Handbook on the Law of Treaties. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 312–340Google Scholar
  78. Lesaffer R (2010) Alberico Gentili’s ius post bellum and Early Modern Peace Treaties. In: Kingsbury B, Straumann B (eds) The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations: Alberico Gentili and the Justice of Empire. OUP, Oxford, pp 210–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. de Louter J (1920) Le droit international public positif, Vol 1. Imprimerie de l'Université, LondonGoogle Scholar
  80. Lukashuk II (1989) The Principle pacta sunt servanda and the Nature of Obligation Under International Law. AJIL 83(3):513–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Marboe I, Reinisch A (2011) Contracts between States and Foreign Private Law Persons. In: Wolfrum R (ed) The Max Planck encyclopedia of public international law. OUP, Oxford. http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1391. Accessed 29 November 2017Google Scholar
  82. Matz-Lück N (2010) Treaties, Conflicts between. In: Wolfrum R (ed) The Max Planck encyclopedia of public international law. OUP, Oxford. http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1485. Accessed 29 November 2017Google Scholar
  83. Mérignhac A (1907) Traité de droit public international, Vol 2. LGDJ, ParisGoogle Scholar
  84. Monro CH (1904) The Digest of Justinian. CUP, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  85. Moravcsik A (1997) Taking Preference Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics. IO 51(4):513–553Google Scholar
  86. Mosler H (1957) L’application du droit international public par les tribunaux nationaux. RdC 91(7):619–731Google Scholar
  87. Neuhold H (1999) The Foreign-Policy “Cost-Benefit-Analysis” Revisited. GYIL 24:84–124Google Scholar
  88. Niedobitek M (2001) Das Recht der grenzüberschreitenden Verträge. Mohr Siebeck, TübingenGoogle Scholar
  89. Nippold O (1894) Der völkerrechtliche Vertrag, seine Stellung im Rechtssystem und seine Bedeutung für das internationale Recht. Wyss, BernGoogle Scholar
  90. Oppenheim L (1905) International Law, Vol 1 Peace. Longsmans, Green and Co, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  91. Osiel M (2009) The End of Reciprocity: Terror, Torture, and the Law of War. CUP, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Peñalver EM (2000) The Persistent Problem of Obligation in International Law. StanJIL 36(2):271–302Google Scholar
  93. Pescatore P (1961) Les relations extérieures des communautés européennes: contribution à la doctrine de la personnalité des organisations internationales. RdC 103(1):1–244Google Scholar
  94. Provost R (2002) International Human Rights and Humanitarian Law. CUP, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Radoikovitch MM (1930) La révision des traités et le Pacte de la Société des Nations. Pedone, ParisGoogle Scholar
  96. Ragazzi M (1997) The Concept of International Obligations erga omnes. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  97. Redslob R (1923) Histoire des grands principes du droit des gens. Rousseau, ParisGoogle Scholar
  98. Ripert G (1933) Les règles du droit civil applicables aux rapports internationaux. RdC 44(2):569–660Google Scholar
  99. Rosenne S (1970) The Law of Treaties. Sijthoff, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  100. Rosenne S (1989) Developments in the Law of Treaties 1945–1986. CUP, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  101. Rudolf W (1967) Völkerrecht und deutsches Recht: Theoretische und dogmatische Untersuchungen über die Anwendung völkerrechtlicher Normen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Mohr, TübingenGoogle Scholar
  102. Salmon J (2011) Article 26. In: Corten O, Klein P (eds) The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties. OUP, Oxford, pp 659–685Google Scholar
  103. Schachter O (1968) Towards a Theory of International Obligation. VaJIL 8(2):300–322Google Scholar
  104. Schermers HG (1996) The Liability of the Member States for the Debts of International Organizations. LIEI 23(1):15–22Google Scholar
  105. Schermers HG, Blokker NM (2003) International Institutional Law, 4th edn. Martinus Nijhoff, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  106. Schneeberger E (1948) Reciprocity as a Maxim of International Law. GeoLJ 37(1):29–41Google Scholar
  107. Schreuer CH (2009) The ICSID Convention: A Commentary. CUP, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Scott JB (1939) Law, the State, and the International Community. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  109. Seidl-Hohenveldern I (1963) Transformation or Adoption of International Law into Municipal Law. ICLQ 12(1):88–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Shaw MN (2014) International Law, 7th edn. CUP, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  111. Shen J (1999) The Basis of International Law: Why Nations Observe. DickJIL 17:287–355Google Scholar
  112. Sicilianos LA (2002) The Classification of Obligations and the Multilateral Dimension of the Relations of International Responsibility. EJIL 13(5):1127–1146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Simma B (1972) Das Reziprozitätselement im Zustandekommen völkerrechtlicher Verträge: Gedanken zu einem Bauprinzip der internationalen Rechtsbeziehungen. Duncker & Humblot, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  114. Simma B (1994) From Bilateralism to Community Interest in International Law. RdC 250(2):217–384Google Scholar
  115. Simma B (2008) Reciprocity. In: Wolfrum R (ed) The Max Planck encyclopedia of public international law. OUP, Oxford. http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1461. Accessed 29 November 2017Google Scholar
  116. Slaughter AM (1993) International Law and International Relations Theory: A Dual Agenda. AJIL 87(2):205–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Tams CJ (2005) Enforcing Obligations erga omnes in International Law. CUP, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Thirlway HWA (1972) International Customary Law and Codification. Sijthoff, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  119. Thirlway HWA (1992) The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice 1960–1989, Part 4. BYIL 63(1):50–51Google Scholar
  120. Triepel H (1899) Völkerrecht und Landesrecht. Hirschfeld, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  121. Ulfstein G, Marauhn T, Zimmermann A (2007) Making Treaties Work: Human Rights, Environment and Arms Control. CUP, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. de Vattel E (1758/1916) Le droit des gens, ou principes de la loi naturelle, appliqués à la conduite et aux affaires des nations et des souverains. In: Fenwick CG (ed) Oceana Publications, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  123. Verdross A (1926) Die Verfassung der Völkerrechtsgemeinschaft. Springer, WienGoogle Scholar
  124. Verdross A (1927) Le fondement du droit international. RdC 16(3):247–323Google Scholar
  125. Waltz K (1979) Theory of International Politics. Addison-Wesley Pub, BostonGoogle Scholar
  126. Watts S (2009) Reciprocity and the Law of War. HarvILJ 50(2):365–434Google Scholar
  127. Wehberg H (1959) Pacta sunt servanda. AJIL 53(4):775–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Whitton JB (1934) La règle pacta sunt servanda. RdC 49(2):147–276Google Scholar
  129. Whitton JB (1935) The Sanctity of Treaties: pacta sunt servanda. International Conciliation 16:395–430Google Scholar
  130. Zemanek K (2000) New Trends in the Enforcement of erga omnes Obligations. MPYUNL 4:1–52Google Scholar
  131. Zoller E (1977) La bonne foi en droit international public. Pedone, ParisGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kirsten Schmalenbach
    • 1
  1. 1.Professor of Public International Law and European Union Law, Law FacultyParis Lodron University of SalzburgSalzburgAustria

Personalised recommendations